<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
        <title>Mindat Mineralogy Messageboard - Analytical Techniques</title>
        <description>How to ID minerals</description>
        <link>http://www.mindat.org/msgboard-100.html</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:55:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Phorum 5.2.8-RC1</generator>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,160423,161557#msg-161557</guid>
            <title>Re: Rietveld refinement and PANalytical</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,160423,161557#msg-161557</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Open David's link, then click on the link right of &quot;List Subscribe:&quot;]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Uwe Kolitsch</dc:creator>
            <category>Analytical Techniques</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,160423,161550#msg-161550</guid>
            <title>Re: Rietveld refinement and PANalytical</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,160423,161550#msg-161550</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Yes, that's the archive, i've looked over it, nothing. Thank you anyway :).]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Alexandra Catalina Seclaman</dc:creator>
            <category>Analytical Techniques</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,160423,161537#msg-161537</guid>
            <title>Re: Rietveld refinement and PANalytical</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,160423,161537#msg-161537</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Alexandra, I know nothing about the answer to your problem, or about Rietveld.  But out of curiosity I clicked on the link that David supplied.  Then I noticed that crazy square at the bottom of the page that was linked.  Wondering what it was, I clicked on it.  Your answer may be there.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Donald Peck</dc:creator>
            <category>Analytical Techniques</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,160423,161437#msg-161437</guid>
            <title>Re: Rietveld refinement and PANalytical</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,160423,161437#msg-161437</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ [<a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/info.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >www.mail-archive.com</a>]]]></description>
            <dc:creator>David Von Bargen</dc:creator>
            <category>Analytical Techniques</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,160423,161435#msg-161435</guid>
            <title>Re: Rietveld refinement and PANalytical</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,160423,161435#msg-161435</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I'm back. I asked on XRD newsgroup, no answer just forwarding me in dark and gloomy places (kidding). I'm very thankful for every answer I got, but my problem still stands. <br />
I have found a partial solution, calibrating the mask manually (but that is very unreliable in my opinion). <br />
So the problem still stands, if anyone has an idea feel free to express it. <br />
<br />
And another question,how do i join the Rietveld mailing list ? I've searched the archive but found no answer, so how do i post my question? Sorry if this is a stupid question.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Alexandra Catalina Seclaman</dc:creator>
            <category>Analytical Techniques</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,157610,160822#msg-160822</guid>
            <title>Re: Monazite end member calculation</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,157610,160822#msg-160822</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ You can get something from Whycheproof, but it isn't as exciting as LB. See this also (if you havent already): Barium contents of granites: key to understanding crustal architecture in the southern Lachlan Fold Belt? Rossiter A G, Gray C M, Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2008, 55, 433-448. ISSN: 0812-0099.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Stuart Mills</dc:creator>
            <category>Analytical Techniques</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,157610,160821#msg-160821</guid>
            <title>Re: Monazite end member calculation</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,157610,160821#msg-160821</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Absolutely, I already have you for your help with the other monazites, and the Lake Boga paper is in the thesis a fair bit, as one of the only other victorian references on similar environments.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Ryan Eagle</dc:creator>
            <category>Analytical Techniques</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,157610,160819#msg-160819</guid>
            <title>Re: Monazite end member calculation</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,157610,160819#msg-160819</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Just remember to reference me ;)]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Stuart Mills</dc:creator>
            <category>Analytical Techniques</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,157610,160818#msg-160818</guid>
            <title>Re: Monazite end member calculation</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,157610,160818#msg-160818</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Neat! I think the groundwater from Lake Boga must flow towards my way, instilling me with the unconsious drive of 'find similar monazite group minerals'.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Ryan Eagle</dc:creator>
            <category>Analytical Techniques</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,157610,160817#msg-160817</guid>
            <title>Re: Monazite end member calculation</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,157610,160817#msg-160817</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Huttonite should have about 18% Si, so that's what this is with a little cheralite component.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Stuart Mills</dc:creator>
            <category>Analytical Techniques</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,157610,160815#msg-160815</guid>
            <title>Re: Monazite end member calculation</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,157610,160815#msg-160815</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I forgot about this one, I don't think I have enough information to solve this one at the moment, but I think it's interesting enough to show everyone.<br />
<br />
This grain occurs in metapelite directly adjacent to one of the pegmatite dykes I am studying, and I would have called it uranothorite were it not for the presence of a little P, Ca and LREE (though rather close to detection), which indicates a monazite group affinity to me. It has rimmed a diagenetic pyrite, and is stacked full of little galena inclusions. I was running out of time when I found it and straight out forgot to put yttrium in the EDS analysis, which pretty much wrecks my chances of figuring out it's true composition from what I've learned in this thread so far, but I don't seem to remember it showing up very strongly. The brighnesses in the element map I have attached aren't really relative to each other either, and the Fe/Pb channels are overlapping. The composition is a little variable across the grain, so there may be domains of different composition.<br />
<br />
Not really after a clear cut determination at this stage, I can always revisit the thin section later next year. Just chasing some opinions, it kind of looks, walks and quacks like a huttonite with minor cheralite, etc with the data i have...<br />
<br />
Normalised EDS:<br />
<br />
Compound	%<br />
SiO2	15.98<br />
P2O5	4.83<br />
CaO	1.29<br />
FeO	2.19<br />
La2O3	0.07*<br />
Ce2O3	0.85*<br />
Pr2O3	0.28*<br />
Nd2O3	1.04<br />
Sm2O3	0.66*<br />
Gd2O3	0.32*<br />
Tb2O3	0.23*<br />
Dy2O3	0.55*<br />
PbO	1.09<br />
ThO2	65.55<br />
UO3	5.07<br />
<br />
[attachment 18744 sunnysidethmap.png]]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Ryan Eagle</dc:creator>
            <category>Analytical Techniques</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,158740,160802#msg-160802</guid>
            <title>Re: X-ray Spectrometer</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,158740,160802#msg-160802</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Yeah, it's definitely starting to sound like this machine may not be all I had hoped for. Fortunately, I don't own it. :)]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Nate Alger</dc:creator>
            <category>Analytical Techniques</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,158740,160800#msg-160800</guid>
            <title>Re: X-ray Spectrometer</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,158740,160800#msg-160800</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ X-ray spectrometers are not that reliable... In my limited experience with an X ray spectrometer, i was disappointed.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Alexandra Catalina Seclaman</dc:creator>
            <category>Analytical Techniques</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,158740,160690#msg-160690</guid>
            <title>Re: X-ray Spectrometer</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,158740,160690#msg-160690</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Thanks everyone for your replys!! I spoke to a rep for the company who explained some of the limitations of the machine, it does not have a vaccum function wihch impedes it's abilities to some extent. It sounds like Pavel hit the nail on the head, machine can NOT detect Be. I still plan on zapping some stones, it sounds like Cu could possibly be detected in tourmaline which may be helpful :)]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Nate Alger</dc:creator>
            <category>Analytical Techniques</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,160423,160601#msg-160601</guid>
            <title>Re: Rietveld refinement and PANalytical</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,160423,160601#msg-160601</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Thank you very much!<br />
<br />
I will forward my question there.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Alexandra Catalina Seclaman</dc:creator>
            <category>Analytical Techniques</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,160423,160574#msg-160574</guid>
            <title>Re: Rietveld refinement and PANalytical</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,160423,160574#msg-160574</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ And the Rietveld mailing list: [<a href="http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >www.mail-archive.com</a>]]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Uwe Kolitsch</dc:creator>
            <category>Analytical Techniques</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,160423,160546#msg-160546</guid>
            <title>Re: Rietveld refinement and PANalytical</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,160423,160546#msg-160546</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hi alexandra<br />
try the XRD newsgroup: Support and use of X-ray diffraction instrumentation [XRD@jiscmail.ac.uk]]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Ralph Bottrill</dc:creator>
            <category>Analytical Techniques</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,160423,160423#msg-160423</guid>
            <title>Rietveld refinement and PANalytical</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,160423,160423#msg-160423</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hello, <br />
<br />
I have done a Rietveld refinement with the help of a PANalytical X'pert Pro but the standard configuration is giving me a lot of troubles. <br />
I am no engineer, so the inner workings of that machine are somewhat a mystery to me. I am asking if someone else has used a PANalytical for Rietveld and if you can give me a better configuration of slots, masks etc. <br />
<br />
Please take into consideration while writing your reply that I'm still a student and I have yet a lot to learn. <br />
<br />
Thank you!]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Alexandra Catalina Seclaman</dc:creator>
            <category>Analytical Techniques</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,159207,160321#msg-160321</guid>
            <title>Re: Lab performing Pb isotope studies wanted</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,159207,160321#msg-160321</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hi Jakub,<br />
<br />
I think You have to contact the Geological or Chemical Department of an university. But I have no idea, how much this costs.<br />
<br />
Greetings from Goslar<br />
<br />
Georg]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Georg Graf</dc:creator>
            <category>Analytical Techniques</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 09:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,151910,160032#msg-160032</guid>
            <title>Re: How did he do that? Diamonds vs CZ</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,151910,160032#msg-160032</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ John,<br />
<br />
The isotopically purified carbon you refer to is essentially pure carbon-12  in other words we are talking about carbon-13 depleted.  Natural carbon is approx 99% C-12 and the rest mostly C-13 (and tiny amounts of the radioactive C-14).  Yes the C-13 depleted diamond acts like you say and in addition it has markedly superior laser properties (quantum mechanical arguments) over regular diamond.<br />
<br />
Back to thermal conductivity. Think about heat as atomic motion. Conductivity is due to atoms hitting neighbors and passing on motion to them on the whole going from high temperature to low. Not only does diamond have a lot of atoms per unit volume but in any diamond the atoms are all bonded together in a strong tetrahedral arrangement, a diamond is essentially a SINGLE molecule! The strong 3D structure accounts for extreme hardness. As for the electrical insulator properties? All its electrons are tied up unlike metals or graphite so no electrical conductivity.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>John Attard</dc:creator>
            <category>Analytical Techniques</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 04:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,155087,159678#msg-159678</guid>
            <title>Re: Raman spectroscopy, dream unrealized?</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,155087,159678#msg-159678</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ There are several handheld Raman spectrometers available, but as is noted above, there is a very high error rate at the moment. The assay area currently ranges from a 1mm diameter site to a 6mm diameter analytical area.<br />
<br />
A friend of mine has been assisting with the software for what is currently described as a multi-shot Raman Spectrometer, where a single &quot;point&quot; is targeted with different laser frequencies in sequence. With careful calibration, I gather that the early results are promising, even using using a prototype with commercial 720nm (deep infrared), 640nm (&quot;ruby&quot; red) and an unspecified blue laser (I guess that they're scavenging from Blu-ray<sup>(TM)</sup> disc drives).<br />
<br />
Unfortunately, the processing still requires some fairly sophisticated equipment, so a laptop computer is essential if you want to take even basic Raman equipment into the field.<br />
<br />
At the end of the day, the accuracy of Raman Spectrometry relies on several factors:<br />
<br />
Sensitivity and discrimination of the detector<br />
Signal quality (both optical and electronic)<br />
Intensity and coherence of the laser<br />
Area of the sample site<br />
Calibration and drift of the equipment<br />
Quality and applicability of the analytical database<br />
<br />
This field is still in its infancy (it took about 60 years for XRD to reach maturity), so it may be a few years yet before a reliable, portable and (relatively) inexpensive device is widely available.<br />
<br />
Incidentally, I certainly wouldn't want a hand-held XRD setup for frequent use, but field-portable equipment is already available. X-Ray sources in close proximity with body parts are definitely not desirable.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Alysson Rowan</dc:creator>
            <category>Analytical Techniques</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,158740,159615#msg-159615</guid>
            <title>Re: X-ray Spectrometer</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,158740,159615#msg-159615</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Nate,<br />
<br />
I have done a lot of X-ray spectrometry on rocks in lithium tetraborate fusion discs.  Our instrument was admittedly a pretty heavy duty tube excited instrument that produced a strong X-ray flux.  But I used to be able to tell if my samples had been analyzed yet just by looking at them.  If they had already been irradiated the disc would be discolored brownish/gray (and that was after only 100 seconds.  Years ago I put a piece of fluorite in the spectrometer and was surprised when its color changed to bright purple.  I laid the sample on the lab bench, and by the next day the purple color was gone and the sample was ugly gray.  I have no idea how strong an X-ray flux your instrument produces, but if you still want to experiment with the machine, I would suggest you try a small cheap scrap sample of your gemstones that you can afford to have turn off-color.  Better to put an unfaceted scrap in the machine than ruin a finished gem.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Joseph Taggart, Jr.</dc:creator>
            <category>Analytical Techniques</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,159207,159207#msg-159207</guid>
            <title>Lab performing Pb isotope studies wanted</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,159207,159207#msg-159207</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hi,<br />
<br />
I m looking for some lab performing lead isotope studies (ICP-MS with magnetic sectors?). We would like to date source of hydrothermal mineralization where only mineral suitable for dating is galena. I know this technique is a little bit out-of-date, but we have no uraninite, zircones, monazites, feldspars etc. I will be grateful for any advice.<br />
<br />
Thanks.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Jakub Jirásek</dc:creator>
            <category>Analytical Techniques</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,158740,158785#msg-158785</guid>
            <title>Re: X-ray Spectrometer</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,158740,158785#msg-158785</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ In any case you'll be able to divide V, Cr-V and Cr emeralds with it. And divide diamonds from zirconia easily. :)]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Pavel Kartashov</dc:creator>
            <category>Analytical Techniques</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 01:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,158740,158777#msg-158777</guid>
            <title>Re: X-ray Spectrometer</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,158740,158777#msg-158777</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Thank you sir, very good to know. I guess I'm really wondering if this machine (of which admittedly I have no technical knowledge of) could potentially have gemological uses?? If anyone knows of or has used these machines as a tool for gemology I would love to know more, any help is appreciated. Thanks!]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Nate Alger</dc:creator>
            <category>Analytical Techniques</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,158740,158769#msg-158769</guid>
            <title>Re: X-ray Spectrometer</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,158740,158769#msg-158769</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Usually X-ray spectrometers unable to detect Be. Their analytical diapazone begin from Na.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Pavel Kartashov</dc:creator>
            <category>Analytical Techniques</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,158740,158745#msg-158745</guid>
            <title>Re: X-ray Spectrometer</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,158740,158745#msg-158745</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Maker is Fischerscope if that makes any difference, thanks!]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Nate Alger</dc:creator>
            <category>Analytical Techniques</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,158740,158740#msg-158740</guid>
            <title>X-ray Spectrometer</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,158740,158740#msg-158740</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hello everyone,<br />
I have access to an X-ray spectrometer which is generally used to test metal fineness and rhodium thickness etc. My question is whether this machine has any application in testing gemstones, for instance if I put a sapphire down on the eye and the machine showed Be is present would this be a reliable way to asess treatment with beryllium? Is there any software that is compatible with this machine that focuses more on gems than metal?? Any assistance would be greatly appreciated, thanks!!]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Nate Alger</dc:creator>
            <category>Analytical Techniques</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,157610,157713#msg-157713</guid>
            <title>Re: Monazite end member calculation</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,157610,157713#msg-157713</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Haha yes, I saw what I had written some time afterwards, and hoped everyone would glaze over it. That's exactly what I've been working in, atomic mass. My formulas are still rubbish though. I found a paper apparently correct formulas in it eventually, but even after trying to replicate them in Excel, the results were not satisfactory. For the same analysis that Stuart ran, it gave me something around 60% monazite, 19% cheralite, 9% huttonite 12% xenotime. I fiddled with the Ca calculations in the cheralite part in every concievable way, but that only made it worse. Those formulas did not take into account Si, P and O though, so thats probably where the wierd numbers are coming from. I guess it's assumed knowledge how to incorporate those into the calculations, but it's beyond my current level of understanding. I love getting down into the nitty gritty of geological problems, but not being much of a natural at the mathematical side of chemistry, my own ignorance is letting me down.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Ryan Eagle</dc:creator>
            <category>Analytical Techniques</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,157610,157699#msg-157699</guid>
            <title>Re: Monazite end member calculation</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,100,157610,157699#msg-157699</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hi Ryan,<br />
<br />
&quot;Divided Wt% elements by atomic number, giving relative mol amounts (I doubt this is quite right, can't be this easy)&quot;<br />
<br />
It's almost that easy. You must divide wt% by <b>atomic mass</b>, not atomic number.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Tomas Husdal</dc:creator>
            <category>Analytical Techniques</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
