<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
        <title>Mindat Mineralogy Messageboard - Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</title>
        <description>Tips for staying safe online and off</description>
        <link>http://www.mindat.org/msgboard-55.html</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 05:47:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Phorum 5.2.15a</generator>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,291045,294567#msg-294567</guid>
            <title>Re: Andara Crystal Scam</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,291045,294567#msg-294567</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Are...are you guys serious?  I really truly can't tell if you guys actually believe this stuff.  In my world I'll occasionally put together a paragraph of buzzwords that don't mean anything for a laugh - &quot;utilizing synergy to create interactive sustainable vector paradigms&quot; and all that.  I'm also vaguely aware that people believe in crystal healing - it's silly to me but whatever.  But this is a new aspect to me - the depth and complexity, the jargon, the unverified and unverifiable claims stacked one on top of another.  Is it really possible for someone to claim fraud _from within_ the crystal healing world?  I bought your crystal to align my chakras and it didn't work?  Just...wow.  I'm not sure I can process this.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Scott Braley</dc:creator>
            <category>Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,291045,294563#msg-294563</guid>
            <title>Re: Andara Crystal Scam</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,291045,294563#msg-294563</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ A couple of things mentioned in this conversation about a silica substance similar to quartz. since glass is primarily melted silica sand it would stand to reason that it is a quartz like substance. secondly it was mentioned that it could be tested for traces of silver or gold as some kind of proof of real Andara. Most all glass has some sort of metal additive either to clear it of color it. Silver and gold are pretty commonly used to color glass.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Dave  Owen</dc:creator>
            <category>Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,291045,294551#msg-294551</guid>
            <title>Re: Andara Crystal Scam</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,291045,294551#msg-294551</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ There is no mystery behind the andara and no sacred land for it to be found on if you ask me.  In my opinion, Nellie found a buried glass dump.  I can well imagine her surprise probably never having seen or heard of the stuff before.  The rest of the story is too absurd to comprehend.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>SlagGlassJulie</dc:creator>
            <category>Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</category>
            <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,291045,294473#msg-294473</guid>
            <title>Re: Andara Crystal Scam</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,291045,294473#msg-294473</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Rock<br />
<br />
I think it goes back longer than ten thousand years ;-)<br />
<br />
Really old bad habbits are even harder to break !]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Wayne Corwin</dc:creator>
            <category>Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,291045,294451#msg-294451</guid>
            <title>Re: Andara Crystal Scam</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,291045,294451#msg-294451</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Its the same old low grade criminal behavior that is typical of all snake oil salesmen for the last ten thousand years. There will always be enough people who want to believe in magic to keep these guys in business.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Rock Currier</dc:creator>
            <category>Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,291045,294447#msg-294447</guid>
            <title>Re: Andara Crystal Scam</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,291045,294447#msg-294447</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ LMAO.  They should have Mark Nea holding one of the bunnies lol <br />
I was speaking with Erica Rock about a lot of her &quot;andaras&quot; coming from me (she purchased them from Dorene), and she was on fire about it.  She truly thought they were from &quot;sacred land&quot;.  She got off of the phone with me and called Mark Nea.  We then talked again and she said that he was going to get back to her on exactly where his andaras came from.  haha, I know.  I said, &quot;Erica, that would be like me having to tell you I would get back to you on information about my son.  He is my life.  He is 3 years old and I can tell you everything about him.&quot;  I went on to tell her that there is absolutely no way that he would have to find out and get back to her, that this stuff is his life, his business, and that what he really needed was time to collaborate a story with Mickey.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>SlagGlassJulie</dc:creator>
            <category>Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,291045,294443#msg-294443</guid>
            <title>Re: Andara Crystal Scam</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,291045,294443#msg-294443</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Andarasucker,<br />
Based on informative, detailed explanations about the &quot;air bubbles&quot; in the &quot;andara crystals&quot;, they are human spirits trapped in there and if you pay CLOSE attention, they will MOVE!  For goodness sakes!  If you sum up the information out there, this is what happened...Andaras fell from the sky and are made from nothing.  You can find them under the ground where white powder is present.  This white powder is residue from unicorns horns rubbing together in play.  The end.  <br />
<br />
As if it isn't bizarre enough to read about, he posted videos about it on Youtube.  <br />
<br />
If possible, is there a way for you to contact me without me putting my personal info on here?]]></description>
            <dc:creator>SlagGlassJulie</dc:creator>
            <category>Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 23:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,291045,294442#msg-294442</guid>
            <title>Re: Andara Crystal Scam</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,291045,294442#msg-294442</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Andarasucker,<br />
I just got the EXACT same emails from Stephen Manz.  EXACT.  I have been patiently trying to inform others of what is going on here and insist that there is NO POSSIBLE WAY that &quot;new&quot; andara colors are popping up out of &quot;sacred&quot; ground at the same time I am getting the identical color variations from a glass dump (above ground).  One person even said to me &quot;People are trying to copy andaras now&quot;.  I told her it is impossible for a glass factory to &quot;copy an andara&quot; as it is nothing more than garbage to them.  I recently listed some glass on Ebay as &quot;non Andara Crystal Pendant&quot; with andara vs. slag glass information to get the word out.  I have made quite a few major andara sellers aware that their glass came from me (unintentionally on my part).  Some are shocked, but to tell the truth, Dorene is the only one who has stopped selling so far.  Oddly (to me anyway), they go back and quote Mickey Magic as if that solves the entire debate.  WHO stands to lose the most money?  He is the kingpin.  He HAS some glass that came from me.  He sells them as crystals.  Through Erica Rock, I offered him to have his &quot;crystals&quot; tested against my slag glass in any form, any time...he wasn't interested.  However, Erica DID test my glass with expensive equipment and I quote her as saying to me &quot;But your glass was tested and it was the EXACT SAME as the andaras!&quot;  I told her that is because it IS the exact same; it is glass from glass factories. The end.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>SlagGlassJulie</dc:creator>
            <category>Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 23:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294423#msg-294423</guid>
            <title>Re: Blatant manipulation of color photographs</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294423#msg-294423</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Jeff,<br />
<br />
Your point about using RAW is well taken. JPEG is a very lossy compression technique and should not be used for anything that you might want to &quot;manipulate&quot; later. Changing white balance, doing any color correction on JPEGs can yield very bad results. You essentially throw away colors and cannot get them back when you work with JPEG.<br />
<br />
One other point, if your camera has the capability to change the bit depth, set it to the maximum, e.g., most cameras come set for 8 bits per color, but some higher end cameras allow for a setting of 12 or 14 bits per color (R, G, and B). The higher the bit depth the more manipulation you can perform on the image without serious loss.<br />
<br />
When you have the image in final form, only then can you convert to the very lossy 8 bit JPEG for display, print, or upload to MinDat and you will have better quality images.<br />
<br />
Ron]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Ronald J. Pellar</dc:creator>
            <category>Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294351#msg-294351</guid>
            <title>Re: Blatant manipulation of color photographs</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294351#msg-294351</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Ron gives a good work flow - well worth following and basically what I do as well.<br />
<br />
You can also get a Gretag color chart, or similar, to help in post processing, these include both black, white and grey, as well as primary (B/G/R) and secondary (M/C/Y) and other colors all in one chart - just make sure that you photograph the grey card and/or photo-quality color chart with the same illumination as your specimens, and that there are no hot-spots or unwanted reflections off of the card.<br />
<br />
LED or fluorescent light sources, by definition, are not full spectrum and os will not accurately capture certain colors; I use either tungsten lamps for larger rocks or off-camera electronic flash for micros - both options are full spectrum and give equally good results, especially when using the color charts and grey cards for post-processing adjustments.  With the post-processing and RAW conversion software provided by Canon, you can adjust the color balance on one image, then apply those corrections to all of the images taken at the same time, automagically.  I'd also suggest shooting camera RAW in addition to JPG; in this way the color balance of the RAW can be adjusted at will, not relying on the camera's settings.  I would not recommend mixing light types, as this could result in muddy colors and backgrounds, and make a good color balance almost impossible.<br />
<br />
Finally, for the case of a wide exposure range, such as what Sofia described - a weak fluorescent response in a specimen with strong fluorescence, such as willemite with hardystonite, or in high contrast subjects in general, I have gotten good results by making multiple exposures over a 4 to 6 stop range, then combining in photoshop via layers, this is commonly referred to HIgh Dynamic Range (HDR) imaging - some cameras or software now does this automatically.  Just make sure nothing moves, camera, light, or subject, between exposures.<br />
<br />
Anyone serious about photographing minerals should get either GIMP (freeware) or Photoshop Elements (about $100 - but easier to use)]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Jeff Weissman</dc:creator>
            <category>Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294348#msg-294348</guid>
            <title>Re: Blatant manipulation of color photographs</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294348#msg-294348</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I agree with Chris... My photos look true to life on my screen, awesome, right? Well, I was absolutely horrified to see the same photos on my friend's computer - everything was saturated in green and made my green willemite crystals totally unrealistic!!! I can only hope that whoever looks at these pictures sees the hue permeating the entire photo and realizes what's going on.<br />
<br />
Some hardystonites are associated with highly fluorescent willemite - I don't have a specialized equipment, it's a simple digital point &amp; shoot camera. In those cases it's hard capture the much darker hardystonite blue - the willemite will overexpose. I make a note about that in the description, so again, I can only hope that the viewer will read, see and understand. I don't do it intentionally, it's just what it is with what I have.<br />
<br />
As for the size - whenever I think of buying something I take out a ruler and see what 2 centimeters or 2 inches looks like on my hand. If the piece is measured within reason then there are no surprises when it arrives.<br />
<br />
ATSM]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Sofia Mathauser</dc:creator>
            <category>Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294346#msg-294346</guid>
            <title>Re: Blatant manipulation of color photographs</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294346#msg-294346</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hi Jeff,<br />
<br />
     I definitely think the corrections you made to the amazonite photo better represent the true color.  In taking photos, I usually set the camera to &quot;Auto&quot;.  It doesn't always give the best results.  I really need to review the manual about how to change the color/white balance.  I'm still learning. <br />
<br />
Best wishes,<br />
Tim]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Timothy Blackwood</dc:creator>
            <category>Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294344#msg-294344</guid>
            <title>Re: Blatant manipulation of color photographs</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294344#msg-294344</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Getting color right is a complex process. The eye can see colors differently than the camera. The most critical part is the light source and white balance. Most fluorescent lamps are not very good for accurate color rendition. The best fluorescent lamps are &quot;Daylight&quot; with color temperatures of 5000K or 6500K. But even these are not as good as tungsten or tungsten-halogen or actual daylight. LED lighting in its present state of development, are similar to fluorescent lighting and can result in color mismatch.<br />
<br />
Most digital cameras have a white balance setting, but these are only approximate. The best method is if the camera has a &quot;custom&quot; white balance setting that uses a gray card to establish the proper white balance. The gray card should be a spectrally neutral card, not any old white, gray, or black paper or cloth. A lot of white paper has brighteners in them which enhances blue to remove the yellow cast of paper. Gray paper, cloth, etc. are not exactly gray and will look gray under certain lighting but change the lighting and they are no longer neutral gray. The eye and the camera will view these as different and you will have a color &quot;mismatch&quot;. There are several companies that make spectrally flat gray cards for the photo industry, e.g., Kodak, Gretag-McBeth, Robin Meyers Imaging, etc. (You can google for more).<br />
<br />
Computer displays have there own color rendering problems. The old CRT displays are roughly equivalent to the sRGB color space that many digital cameras default to. More expensive DSLR cameras can and should be set to AdobeRGB color space. This space is a better match to the modern LCD color displays. Your computer display can usually be set to a &quot;default color profile&quot;, but for very critical color matching the display should be measured for color and a specific &quot;profile&quot; created. The display profile setting affects the translation of color values from the camera to what the display can handle. The AdobeRGB color space has a larger color gamut than the sRGB color space, i.e., it can reproduce more saturated colors.<br />
<br />
In general, for reasonable color rendition, <br />
     1) set the white balance properly (preferably with a spectrally neutral gray card), <br />
     2) do not use fluorescent or LED lighting,<br />
     3) use natural daylight or tungsten lighting,<br />
     4) do not mix different types of lighting,<br />
     5) set camera to AdobeRGB color values, if possible,<br />
     6) set LCD displays to AdobeRGB profile.<br />
This should reduce any necessary color tweaking considerably.<br />
<br />
I follow these steps for my photography and I do not have an issue with the appearance of the minerals on my display, even with some of the more problematic minerals like dioptase.<br />
<br />
Ron]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Ronald J. Pellar</dc:creator>
            <category>Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294333#msg-294333</guid>
            <title>Re: Blatant manipulation of color photographs</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294333#msg-294333</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Tim - sorry, my mistake - the andyrobertsite is fine, certainly there is something goofy with the microcline.  I did a quick adjustment in Photoshop Elements, trying to get the background neutral and the fingers &quot;normal&quot;, assuming the person holding the crystal does not have an issue with excess silver consumption; still not satisfactory - probably the camera was set to a color balance that did not correspond to the illumination being used.<br />
<br />
<br />
[attachment 45529 527507.jpg]]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Jeff Weissman</dc:creator>
            <category>Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294327#msg-294327</guid>
            <title>Re: Blatant manipulation of color photographs</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294327#msg-294327</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ In my experience I will paste the photos of minerals I am interested into photo editing software and then scale it to actual size. But I also keep a ruler by my monitor for the same reason. If I am really interested in a piece I have asked the seller to take addition photos without enhance lighting or from different angles, or with backlighting. I learned this like everyone else, after being surprised that the mineral in the mail didn't look quite like the one in the high resolution photograph. Even samples in my case at home look different depending on the time of day, if the lights are on, sunlight outside, etc.  Most times it is not intentional manipulation by online sellers just a function of the fine photographic equipment available these days. Buyer beware...]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Vincent Rigatti</dc:creator>
            <category>Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294308#msg-294308</guid>
            <title>Re: Blatant manipulation of color photographs</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294308#msg-294308</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ My photo set up is very simple and definitely not ideal.  My background is a large sheet of either white or black poster paper placed on the kitchen countertop.  Primary lighting is from the overhead fluorescent light coming from over my shoulders.  A smaller incandescent lamp is sometimes used for backlighting.  And sometimes I use the camera's flash.  Depending on the combination of lighting, the color in the photo can vary widely.  I don't have Photoshop, but Picasa (freeware) offers a variety of tools to adjust photos.  In Picasa I find the features to adjust the color and contrast to be most useful.  Tools to adjust the sharpness of the photo and adjust the saturation of the color to also be helpful.  Using information from the camera Picasa selects what it considers to be appropriate levels of adjustments, but these can be changed with sliding buttons.  You can preview the results and undo any changes you don't like.  Wow!  I can't imagine anyone paying a $1200 deposit just to rent a supermacro lens.  My camera is a Fujifilm model and it has a very good supermacro setting.  I just try not to use the digital zoom feature available using the supermacro feature (it can get kind of grainy).  I love viewing the photos posted by everyone and am in awe of the photographic skills being demonstrated.  I'm just a novice and am learning as I go, through trial and error.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Timothy Blackwood</dc:creator>
            <category>Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 04:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294307#msg-294307</guid>
            <title>Re: Blatant manipulation of color photographs</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294307#msg-294307</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Everyone sees light waves differently, therefore everyone perceives color differently. My wife and I perceive blue in different shades.. We are not color blind at all, the way color is perceived through each our eyes is different, that's all.. For the billions and billions of people out there do you think all our eyes see the same?? Absolutely not!!<br />
<br />
Andrew.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Andrew Johns</dc:creator>
            <category>Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 04:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294301#msg-294301</guid>
            <title>Re: Blatant manipulation of color photographs</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294301#msg-294301</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ My photo setups are usually less than perfect and I spend most of my time in photoshop trying to get the photo to look how the specimen actually does. This usually involves color, and various techniques to bring out the detail that a standard camera lens can't pick up because the camera shop wants a $1200 deposit to rent their supermacro lens.<br />
<br />
When viewing photos of specimens on computers, one thing people should keep in mind is that different devices aren't necessarily properly color calibrated so what looks one shade of blue on my monitor might be another shade of blue on your monitor. Or what might look purple on my monitor, might look pink on yours.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Jenna Mast</dc:creator>
            <category>Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 01:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294300#msg-294300</guid>
            <title>Re: Blatant manipulation of color photographs</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294300#msg-294300</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Jeff,<br />
<br />
I was actually referring to the amazonite shown in the message from Fred Davis on page 1 of this thread (I did reference the photo ID number given in that message).<br />
<br />
Tim B.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Timothy Blackwood</dc:creator>
            <category>Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 01:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294294#msg-294294</guid>
            <title>Re: Blatant manipulation of color photographs</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294294#msg-294294</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Tim B. - the issue isn't the color, its the size, with regards to the andyrobertsite - the color looks dead-on to me, but slightly oversaturated on my display, so its OK.  The perspective makes it look bigger than it really is, especially on the Min Rec cover.  I saw the specimen a long time ago, in transit.  It is surprisingly small when the mind wants it to be larger, especially after looking at the published images.<br />
<br />
As far as blatant or inadvertent image manipulation, I could name names and some have made POTD as well; but I could also name many who do a good job with accurate color and color balance/saturation rendition.<br />
<br />
As far as the tourmaline image that started this thread, the image is either over saturated or strongly backlit, making the crystal more attractive than it appears - the image should have an associated note stating that it is backlit, otherwise, buyer beware and quite whining.<br />
<br />
Tim J. - the acerbic comments here and elsewhere are greatly enjoyed!]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Jeff Weissman</dc:creator>
            <category>Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 23:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294290#msg-294290</guid>
            <title>Re: Blatant manipulation of color photographs</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294290#msg-294290</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hello,<br />
<br />
     I uploaded photo 527507 to the galleries.  I did not personally take the photo and have no knowledge of the camera used.  Also, I did nothing to the color of the photo prior to uploading it.  I've never even seen the specimen in person.  It is apparent to me that different cameras may sense and render colors differently.  What appeared to be turquoise-blue in person may be made to look very different by the camera's sensor.  I've uploaded several photos of specimens from my own collection lately and have noticed variations in color depending upon the color of background, whether or not I used the camera's flash and whether or not I used additional backlighting.  Just some thoughts.  But please do not assume that all photos have been manipulated.  I still haven't figured out how to accurately show a specimen's true color in every case.  Returning to quietly lurking now until I have something else to say.<br />
<br />
Best wishes,<br />
Tim<br />
Cohasset, Minnesota, USA]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Timothy Blackwood</dc:creator>
            <category>Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 22:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294285#msg-294285</guid>
            <title>Re: Blatant manipulation of color photographs</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294285#msg-294285</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Things do grow in my memory. We have it posted here [<a href="http://www.mindat.org/photo-230609.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >www.mindat.org</a>] at 4.1 cm.<br />
<br />
And Yes a ruler by the screen is essential when shopping the net.;-)]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Rob Woodside</dc:creator>
            <category>Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 20:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,291045,294284#msg-294284</guid>
            <title>Re: Andara Crystal Scam</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,291045,294284#msg-294284</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This is the supposed head gatekeeper for the Andaras....Mickey Magic...convicted drug dealer.  He looks trustworthy to me!<br />
<br />
<div id="div_f866a9867f50b0b5ebbc136de1f46ac8"
     class="mod_embed_images"
     style="width:500px">

  

    
      
    

    <div id="imagediv_f866a9867f50b0b5ebbc136de1f46ac8" class="mod_embed_images_image"
         style="width:500px; height:397px">

    

    <a href="http://mickeymagic.com/2flatbun2.gif">
        <img src="http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?addon,55,module=embed_images,url=http%3A%2F%2Fmickeymagic.com%2F2flatbun2.gif"
             width="500"
             height="397"
             id="image_f866a9867f50b0b5ebbc136de1f46ac8"
             alt="2flatbun2.gif"
             title="2flatbun2.gif"/>
    </a>

    

    </div>

    <div class="mod_embed_images_info " id="info_f866a9867f50b0b5ebbc136de1f46ac8"
      >
      <a id="link_f866a9867f50b0b5ebbc136de1f46ac8" href="http://mickeymagic.com/2flatbun2.gif">2flatbun2.gif</a>
    </div>

  

 </div>


<script type="text/javascript">
mod_embed_images_loadimage('f866a9867f50b0b5ebbc136de1f46ac8', 'http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?addon,55,module=embed_images,url=http%3A%2F%2Fmickeymagic.com%2F2flatbun2.gif', 'http://mickeymagic.com/2flatbun2.gif', 'http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?addon,55,module=embed_images,check_scaling=1,url=http%3A%2F%2Fmickeymagic.com%2F2flatbun2.gif', '', 294284, 600, 600, 'Loading image ...', false);
</script>
<br />
<br />
&quot;Trust me...its monatomic crystal, I swear....wanna buy some pot with that?&quot;<br/>]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Jim Meeker</dc:creator>
            <category>Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 20:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294283#msg-294283</guid>
            <title>Re: Blatant manipulation of color photographs</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294283#msg-294283</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Rob, I like the idea of having a ruler by the computer and possibly with you in transit. The reason I say that is that the cluster of andyrobertsite was 18mm long and the specimen was about 3 to 3.5 cm long in totality... I used to own it.<br />
Steve.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Steven  Kuitems</dc:creator>
            <category>Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 20:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294273#msg-294273</guid>
            <title>Re: Blatant manipulation of color photographs</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294273#msg-294273</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Nothing manipulated in the first photo.<br />
<br />
Smoke 3 packs a day for a decade or two and your fingertips will look like that.<br />
<br />
I'd like to see an x-ray of the poor bugger's lungs.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Tim Jokela Jr</dc:creator>
            <category>Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 18:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294264#msg-294264</guid>
            <title>Re: Blatant manipulation of color photographs</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294264#msg-294264</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I remember a display in Tucson many years ago with Min Rec covers and the actual specimens. The photos probably beat out the specimens in 3/4 of the comparisons. It probably was due to the opportunity for the photographer to control the lighting (it was before the widespread use of Photoshop) versus the general lighting in the Convention Center and the case.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>David Von Bargen</dc:creator>
            <category>Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 17:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294262#msg-294262</guid>
            <title>Re: Blatant manipulation of color photographs</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294262#msg-294262</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Fred, I wonder if they'd been exposed to a lot of UV?<br />
<br />
Chris, I'm not sure what you're hearing is eBay bashing. That would suggest a hateful and &quot;pewrsonal&quot; attack. The operative issue is color manipulation. If you need outside the electronic world examples, just look at the amazonites in John Barlow's collection book.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Van King</dc:creator>
            <category>Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 16:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294258#msg-294258</guid>
            <title>Re: Blatant manipulation of color photographs</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294258#msg-294258</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ After seeing the ten inch photo of Andyrobertsite on the MR cover, it is a little unsettling to see the 6 cm piece in person.<br />
<br />
Photography for vending is a real skill. If the photo is far better you may make faster sales, but you'll get more returns and a bad rep. If the photo is worse than the specimen any purchaser will be pleased. The trick is to honestly document the piece. Fortunately any real dealer does not have the time to muck about with the photo. Collectors however have all the time in the world.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Rob Woodside</dc:creator>
            <category>Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 16:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294251#msg-294251</guid>
            <title>Re: Blatant manipulation of color photographs</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294251#msg-294251</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Steve - In that case, perhaps the hand model's lips were a rich turquoise-blue color.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Fred E. Davis</dc:creator>
            <category>Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 14:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294250#msg-294250</guid>
            <title>Re: Blatant manipulation of color photographs</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,55,294223,294250#msg-294250</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Fred, the picture's color balance wasn't manipulated. It was just very very cold in the studio that day.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Steve Hardinger</dc:creator>
            <category>Fakes, Frauds and Marketing Ploys</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 14:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
