<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
        <title>Mindat Mineralogy Messageboard - Mistakes and Errors</title>
        <description>If you find errors or mistakes in mindat.org, let me know here</description>
        <link>http://www.mindat.org/msgboard-7.html</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:59:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Phorum 5.2.15a</generator>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296867,296897#msg-296897</guid>
            <title>Re: Vermont locality errors</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296867,296897#msg-296897</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Fixed. You're too fast. I wasn't finished with this set of files yet.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Chester S. Lemanski, Jr.</dc:creator>
            <category>Mistakes and Errors</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296867,296867#msg-296867</guid>
            <title>Vermont locality errors</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296867,296867#msg-296867</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ 1) Regarding this new locality: [<a href="http://www.mindat.org/loc-249967.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >www.mindat.org</a>]<br />
- Mount Tabor is actually a town in Rutland County, Vermont. <br />
- Mt Tabor (the mountain summit) is in the town of Peru, Bennington County.<br />
 (Confusing I know, but the locality page should be fixed.) <br />
<br />
2) Also this page is in error: [<a href="http://www.mindat.org/loc-27600.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >www.mindat.org</a>]<br />
- The former Danby Marble Quarry is on Quarry Rd. in the town of Danby, near the town line of Mount Tabor. It is not i<i>n</i> the town of Mount Tabor. <br />
- It is a famous quarry now operated by Vermont Quarries Corp. and is the largest underground dimension stone quarry in the world. The company calls it Vermont Danby Quarry.<br />
<br />
The 1942 <i>Rocks &amp; Minerals</i> reference used for this locality entry is seriously out of date.<br />
<br />
3) East Dorset is a village in the town of Dorset. It should be placed under the existing locality page for Dorset.<br />
<br />
4) Saxtons River is a village in the town of Rockingham. The locality already exists:  [<a href="http://www.mindat.org/loc-236729.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >www.mindat.org</a>]<br />
  This new locality is in error: [<a href="http://www.mindat.org/loc-249969.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >www.mindat.org</a>]<br />
<br />
5) Same problem with Athens. It already exists as a locality: [<a href="http://www.mindat.org/loc-48808.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >www.mindat.org</a>].<br />
    This new locality is a duplicate: [<a href="http://www.mindat.org/loc-249970.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >www.mindat.org</a>]]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Peter Cristofono</dc:creator>
            <category>Mistakes and Errors</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,285672,296857#msg-296857</guid>
            <title>Re: clinosafflorite?</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,285672,296857#msg-296857</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ [<a href="http://www.mindat.org/photo-170104.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >www.mindat.org</a>] Why is this photo still in the database as it is clearly incorrect?The druse is safflorite and the shiny crystals are cubo-octahedrons of skutterudite. [attachment 45987 Clinosafflorite.JPG]]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Reiner Mielke</dc:creator>
            <category>Mistakes and Errors</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,289725,296786#msg-296786</guid>
            <title>Re: Photo 521111 misidentified as Fuxiaotuite ???</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,289725,296786#msg-296786</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Please note the name 'Fuxiaotuite' has been withdrawn by the CNMNC and the mineral will be receiving a new name.<br />
<br />
Jolyon]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Jolyon &amp; Katya Ralph</dc:creator>
            <category>Mistakes and Errors</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 06:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,294713,296734#msg-296734</guid>
            <title>Re: Gaspeite</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,294713,296734#msg-296734</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Thanks Reiner.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Rob Woodside</dc:creator>
            <category>Mistakes and Errors</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,295825,296691#msg-296691</guid>
            <title>Re: Modified by CombineZP</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,295825,296691#msg-296691</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Sorry - but it's still there for child photos.<br />
<br />
Note via edit: Still there for parent photos as well.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Modris Baum</dc:creator>
            <category>Mistakes and Errors</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 02:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,295167,296658#msg-296658</guid>
            <title>Re: Image posted to incorrect locality</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,295167,296658#msg-296658</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Thanks Rob!<br />
<br />
<br />
MRH]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Mark Heintzelman</dc:creator>
            <category>Mistakes and Errors</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 21:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,295167,296643#msg-296643</guid>
            <title>Re: Image posted to incorrect locality</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,295167,296643#msg-296643</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I fixed localities]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Rob Woodside</dc:creator>
            <category>Mistakes and Errors</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 17:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296533,296641#msg-296641</guid>
            <title>Re: Bambollita Mine = Moctezuma Mine?</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296533,296641#msg-296641</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hello Vik,<br />
<br />
I have collected at both mines twice and I have never found kinichilite at the Bambollita mine. The only kinichilite I have found has been from the Moctezuma (Bambolla) mine. I suppose that it could occur at the Bambollita mine, but as I have mentioned, the mineral suite at the Bambollita mine is a little different from the Moctezuma,(Bambolla), mine. I think that many old labels on specimens could have these two mines mixed up. Because of their close proximatry, it is not unlikely that specimens from either mine could be intermixed.<br />
<br />
Brent]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Brent Thorne</dc:creator>
            <category>Mistakes and Errors</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 16:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296533,296631#msg-296631</guid>
            <title>Re: Bambollita Mine = Moctezuma Mine?</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296533,296631#msg-296631</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Geographical info added to both locality pages.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Uwe Kolitsch</dc:creator>
            <category>Mistakes and Errors</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 13:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,292293,296630#msg-296630</guid>
            <title>Re: Photo search problem</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,292293,296630#msg-296630</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ &quot;or am I the only one try try to refine a search and fail as it drops out of mineral photos?&quot;<br />
No, I can also confirm the bug.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Uwe Kolitsch</dc:creator>
            <category>Mistakes and Errors</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 13:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296531,296597#msg-296597</guid>
            <title>Re: Photo erased</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296531,296597#msg-296597</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Fixed. thanks for the description about the sample.<br />
<br />
Martins da Pedra]]></description>
            <dc:creator>António Manuel Ináçio Martins</dc:creator>
            <category>Mistakes and Errors</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 08:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296533,296589#msg-296589</guid>
            <title>Re: Bambollita Mine = Moctezuma Mine?</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296533,296589#msg-296589</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hi Don,<br />
<br />
no I didn't, thanks for pointing that out :-)<br />
<br />
The question still stands though, does Kinichilite occur at Bambollita or not?<br />
<br />
Vik]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Vik Vanrusselt</dc:creator>
            <category>Mistakes and Errors</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 06:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,292293,296588#msg-296588</guid>
            <title>Re: Photo search problem</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,292293,296588#msg-296588</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I reported this a while back as I was having the same frustration. David responded and did say he fixed the default to be mineral. It worked for a bit and then the bug came back. It's a pain to keep checking the radio button but at least I know there's a bug and know to check. I bet there are lot of people getting null hits because they don't know to check the button each time.<br />
<br />
regards,<br />
stephanie :-)]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Stephanie Martin</dc:creator>
            <category>Mistakes and Errors</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 06:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,292293,296581#msg-296581</guid>
            <title>Re: Photo search problem</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,292293,296581#msg-296581</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This bug still needs fixing, or am I the only one try try to refine a search and fail as it drops out of mineral photos?]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Ralph Bottrill</dc:creator>
            <category>Mistakes and Errors</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 03:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296387,296580#msg-296580</guid>
            <title>Re: confirmation methods</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296387,296580#msg-296580</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Even when I add just one mineral it won't acccept it without a confirmation method, but this disappears and I have to go in and add it again on the edit mineral page.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Ralph Bottrill</dc:creator>
            <category>Mistakes and Errors</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 02:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296293,296563#msg-296563</guid>
            <title>Re: Rammelsbergite?</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296293,296563#msg-296563</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hello Paul,<br />
<br />
  The blue stain can be removed by placing the sample in HCl again ( it disappears almost instantly), then after neutralizing with a sodium bicarbonate solution and rinsing in deionized water, soak in alcohol to remove the water and it will dry without the blue appearing.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Reiner Mielke</dc:creator>
            <category>Mistakes and Errors</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 20:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296533,296559#msg-296559</guid>
            <title>Re: Bambollita Mine = Moctezuma Mine?</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296533,296559#msg-296559</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Vic, did you notice that the original label for the specimen specifies &quot;Mina Bambolla&quot;?]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Don Saathoff</dc:creator>
            <category>Mistakes and Errors</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 19:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296533,296558#msg-296558</guid>
            <title>Re: Bambollita Mine = Moctezuma Mine?</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296533,296558#msg-296558</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Thanks Brent :-)<br />
<br />
The reason I asked is because I have a specimen of microcrystalline Kinichilite from the Bambollita Mine.<br />
<br />
This mineral is not listed for the Bambollita, but apparently it should be, see this specimen: [<a href="http://www.minfind.com/mineral-138421.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >www.minfind.com</a>]<br />
<br />
Vik]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Vik Vanrusselt</dc:creator>
            <category>Mistakes and Errors</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 19:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296293,296553#msg-296553</guid>
            <title>Re: Rammelsbergite?</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296293,296553#msg-296553</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hi Reiner,<br />
<br />
Thank you for the tip. Very usefull.<br />
Do you have perhaps also a tip for removing the blue stain ?<br />
<br />
Take care and best regards.<br />
<br />
Paul.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Paul De Bondt</dc:creator>
            <category>Mistakes and Errors</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 18:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296533,296551#msg-296551</guid>
            <title>Re: Bambollita Mine = Moctezuma Mine?</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296533,296551#msg-296551</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hello Vik,<br />
<br />
The Bambollita mine is approximately 1/2 mile lower down on the hill from the Moctezuma (Bambolla) mine. The GPS coordinates would be very close, but not exactly the same. They are not the same mine and the mineralization is different at each mine.<br />
<br />
Brent]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Brent Thorne</dc:creator>
            <category>Mistakes and Errors</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 18:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296531,296538#msg-296538</guid>
            <title>Re: Photo erased</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296531,296538#msg-296538</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Don't forget to add the size info.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Debbie Woolf</dc:creator>
            <category>Mistakes and Errors</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 17:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296531,296537#msg-296537</guid>
            <title>Re: Photo erased</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296531,296537#msg-296537</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Fixed.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Chester S. Lemanski, Jr.</dc:creator>
            <category>Mistakes and Errors</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 17:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296533,296533#msg-296533</guid>
            <title>Bambollita Mine = Moctezuma Mine?</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296533,296533#msg-296533</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hello all,<br />
<br />
When trying to find information on one of my specimens, I've noticed that the Bambollita Mine (http://www.mindat.org/loc-2361.html) and the Moctezuma Mine (http://www.mindat.org/loc-2356.html) have the same GPS coordinates (Latitude: 29°48'N, Longitude: 109°40'W).<br />
<br />
Are these entries the same mine? If so, their names and mineral lists should be merged.<br />
<br />
Vik]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Vik Vanrusselt</dc:creator>
            <category>Mistakes and Errors</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 15:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296531,296531#msg-296531</guid>
            <title>Photo erased</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296531,296531#msg-296531</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ [<a href="http://www.mindat.org/photo-540582.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" >www.mindat.org</a>]<br />
<br />
I uploaded this picture three times and three times was erased.<br />
I wonder what's wrong with this photo because I was not given any reason.<br />
<br />
Tank´s<br />
<br />
Martins da Pedra]]></description>
            <dc:creator>António Manuel Ináçio Martins</dc:creator>
            <category>Mistakes and Errors</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 15:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296387,296508#msg-296508</guid>
            <title>Re: confirmation methods</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296387,296508#msg-296508</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Similar happened to me recently, first time I'd done a batch under confirmation method &amp; it looked like it didn't work, I had clicked all the minerals first then the method of confirmation, along with all the other entered details &amp; hit submit, went back in to check &amp; look like it failed so this time I hit confirmation method first then ticked all the minerals &amp; hit submit, went back &amp; checked &amp; it had worked. Whether this worked because I clicked the method first or because the data was just this (reminds me of a similar issue we have when entering a new locality we have to resubmit for the co-ordinates) I don't know, but it worked :-)]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Debbie Woolf</dc:creator>
            <category>Mistakes and Errors</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 11:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296455,296474#msg-296474</guid>
            <title>Re: Duplicate photos with conflicting descrptions</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296455,296474#msg-296474</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Complaint sent]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Ralph Bottrill</dc:creator>
            <category>Mistakes and Errors</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 00:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296387,296470#msg-296470</guid>
            <title>Re: confirmation methods</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296387,296470#msg-296470</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ That one works but I marked all the minerals from this site as XRD-confirmed but they don't show? Actually you can do them individually but when do try it for a batch of minerals it fails?]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Ralph Bottrill</dc:creator>
            <category>Mistakes and Errors</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 23:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296293,296459#msg-296459</guid>
            <title>Re: Rammelsbergite?</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296293,296459#msg-296459</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Thanks Paul,<br />
<br />
   I have found that after HCl treatment the blue color only appears while the samples dry. However if you soak the sample in pure wood alcohol to remove all the water first, then when the alcohol evaporates the blue tarnish does not form. I have never had this problem with rammelsbergite or lollingite only safflorite. Layering as you describe also occurs in the Cobalt, Ontario ores and can get very complex.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Reiner Mielke</dc:creator>
            <category>Mistakes and Errors</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296455,296455#msg-296455</guid>
            <title>Duplicate photos with conflicting descrptions</title>
            <link>http://www.mindat.org/forum.php?read,7,296455,296455#msg-296455</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Photo 365965 shows a nice 5 by 7 cms specimen of plumbian Orthoclase from Broken Hill. Photo 447733 is identical but the same specimen has now grown to 8 by 11 cms. It had never occurred to me that inflation also affects mineral specimens.  John S.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>John Sobolewski</dc:creator>
            <category>Mistakes and Errors</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 20:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
