|
|
Welcome!
Zircon
Posted by Branko Rieck
|
|
Zircon February 14, 2011 10:49AM |
|
Registered: 2 years ago Posts: 623 |
I have noticed that there is a little confusion on the refractive indices of zircon on the web. Mindat lists: nω = 1.925 - 1.961 nε = 1.980 - 2.015 but other sites state nω and nε in reverse order (e.g.: [webmineral.com] ). Could somebody knowledgable comment on this?
Branko
Branko
|
|
Re: Zircon February 14, 2011 04:21PM |
|
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 1,315 |
Hi Branko,
Mindat data is correct. Since Zircon is tetragonal, it is uniaxial, that is with a single optic axis. Also, since ε is greater than ω the optic sign is (+). This should be true in all cases. Only when when Zircon is metamict can it show some biaxial characteristics but minor only and e' (ε-ω) should still always be positive never negative. Mindat uses the same optical data for Zircon as is listed for Zircon in Handbook of Mineralogy.
Ron
Mindat data is correct. Since Zircon is tetragonal, it is uniaxial, that is with a single optic axis. Also, since ε is greater than ω the optic sign is (+). This should be true in all cases. Only when when Zircon is metamict can it show some biaxial characteristics but minor only and e' (ε-ω) should still always be positive never negative. Mindat uses the same optical data for Zircon as is listed for Zircon in Handbook of Mineralogy.
Ron
|
|
Re: Zircon February 14, 2011 04:33PM |
|
Registered: 2 years ago Posts: 623 |
Ron,
thanks! If the indices of refraction were as stated on webmineral.com, zircon would be optically negative, which is in fact what they claim. So that alone is no clear indication on who is right and who is wrong. But I tend to believe Mindat, because it is almost always correct. The Handbook of Mineralogy is another indication on that.
Branko
thanks! If the indices of refraction were as stated on webmineral.com, zircon would be optically negative, which is in fact what they claim. So that alone is no clear indication on who is right and who is wrong. But I tend to believe Mindat, because it is almost always correct. The Handbook of Mineralogy is another indication on that.
Branko
|
Re: Zircon February 14, 2011 05:03PM |
|
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 11,061 |
Copyright © Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau 1993-2013. Site Map. Locality, mineral & photograph data are the copyright of the individuals who submitted them. Site hosted & developed by Jolyon Ralph.
Mindat.org is an online information resource dedicated to providing free mineralogical information to all. Mindat relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Mindat does not offer minerals for sale. If you would like to add information to improve the quality of our database, then click here
to register.
Current server date and time: June 19, 2013 16:05:25
Current server date and time: June 19, 2013 16:05:25
Mindat Lightbox
Options| Fade toolbar when not in focus | Fix toolbar to bottom of page | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hide Social Media Links | |||
| Slideshow frame delay | seconds | ||



















