Discussions

💬 Home 🔎 Search 📅 Latest

╳Discussions

💬 Home 🔎 Search 📅 Latest

Groups

Recent Images in Discussions

PhotosEpididymite - Mount Malosa, Zomba District, Malawi

25th Feb 2012 02:05 UTCModris Baum 🌟 Expert

Epididymite, Aegirine

Mount Malosa, Zomba, Southern Region, Malawi

This looks like eudidymite to me.

But I know that at Mt. Malso you can't tell epidymite from eudidymite without analysis.

Has this been analytically verified as epididymite? Seems surprising to me - but maybe my "rules of thumb" are wrong.

25th Feb 2012 03:26 UTCKelly Nash 🌟 Expert

That didn't take long, I just entered it about an hour ago. In fact, I meant to enter it as eudidymite, and just corrected it (and now your link goes to another specimen - mine was photo-447559). Thanks for saving me an email from a manager.

But no, it hasn't been analyzed, by me anyway. Perhaps the fellow I bought it from did, but I think most of these from Mt. Malosa are just going on visual ID (see others).

25th Feb 2012 03:39 UTCModris Baum 🌟 Expert

Hi Kelly,

Actually, I had two comments on two separate photos (one by someone else). The problem with "talk page" comments (which I realized after the fact) is that if you make comments on more than one photo from a locality is that both threads have the same header. But the links (still) go to different photos.

Modris

I just put numbers on the messages. Maybe that will help unconfuse things.

25th Feb 2012 15:50 UTCReiner Mielke Expert

Why can't you tell them apart at Mt.Malosa without analysis if they are crystals? One is othorhombic and the other monoclinic should be easy to tell the difference?

25th Feb 2012 17:43 UTCModris Baum 🌟 Expert

Well - I think I can tell them apart at MSH - most of the time.

As for Mt. Malosa, I'm just parroting what I've read.

But even albite (triclinic) can look orthorhombic at times - and so on and so on.

However, I'm probably the last person who should comment on morphology.

When I distinguish epidymite from eudidymite (or baryte from calcite etc., etc., ) I'm not thinking "this is orthorhombic", "that's monoclinic".

The fact of the matter is that most of the time I'm not sure. The minerals are almost always twinned and often occur together - sometimes epitactically, sometimes not.

I just "know" that one of thme grows like "this and this and this", whereas the other one grows like "that and that and that".

No doubt what I think I "know" is sometimes wrong. And often enough, I can't tell for sure even with what I "know".

Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: April 19, 2024 13:14:35

Go to top of page