Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

PhotosI hate when that happens: Anthophyllite? Buckwheat Dolomite

10th May 2012 02:29 UTCModris Baum 🌟 Expert

07543430016049788287973.jpg
This is a talk page topic. Click the thread header photo to see more info.


Anthophyllite is one of several minerals that has come and gone from the Buckwheat Dolomite (Franklin NJ) list. It's still a valid mineral - but not at Franklin.


Does anyone know what has happened with this?


Thanks - Modris

11th May 2012 09:22 UTCOlav Revheim Manager

Modris,


I cannot help in answering what happened at the locality entry, but I am curious on the environment in which the "anthophyllite?" of your photo has formed. Can you share any information on associated minerals testing etc.?


The reasoin I am asking is that anthophyllite is formed ( as a general rule of thumb, not without exceptions) in relatively high PT environments associated with other Mg minerals such as talc, phlogopite, magnesite, chlorite etc, with a high Mg/Ca ratio. It appears from your photo that the "anthophyllite?" has formed with dolomite as a late hydrothermal mineral. If so, it would be an unusual association for anthophyllite, and therefore very interesting.


:-)


Olav

11th May 2012 12:44 UTCSpencer Ivan Mather

Yes, this is deffinately a strange occurance, I'v never heard of Anthophyllite forming in or on or with dolomite before, as Olav said, anthophyllite is usually a mineral from high PT environments!

11th May 2012 14:57 UTCJolyon Ralph Founder

Normally, if a mineral has previously been reported from a site, but is now known NOT to occur there, it should remain in the mineral list but marked as "erroneously reported" along with a reference to the discreditation.


Minerals should not just be deleted from lists because you "know it's not found there".

11th May 2012 18:08 UTCModris Baum 🌟 Expert

Olav & Jolyon,


The occurrence is in the so-called "Buckwheat Dolomite". According to Palache (1935) and Dunn (1995) it occurred as a "veinlike mass of gray dolomite" in the west wall of the Buckwheat Open Cut in the Franklin Mine. ... varied minerals, however, have no evident relation to the Zn-Mn-Fe character of the orebodies." (See Buckwheat Pit for the references as well as a species list - which however includes minerals from the orebody as well as from the dolomite.)


Peters et al (1983) published a list of mineral found in this environment In the Mineralogical Record but I don't have a copy of this article and I don't know if "anthophyllite" was on this list. However the Feb 1961 issue of The Picking Table (Vol 2, #1) states that "the list of Franklin-Ogdensburg mineral species validated by Professor Frondel has been brough up to date. Several additions have been made: allmandite, anthophyllite ..."


Frondel's book The Mineralogy of Franklin and Sterling Hill, Wiley, 1972) does not list anthophjyllite for the Buckwheat Dolomite. Instead, anthophyllite is attributed to "slickensided surfaces composed of tremolite, often asbestiform, or less commonly of antigorite, chryotile or anthophyllite admixed with calcite, or finely divided zincite or franklinite."


Kushner (A Guide to Mineral Collecting at Franklin and Sterling Hill, New Jersey, Kushner Books, 1974), states that anthophyllite "Sometimes looks like Asbestos; found at Sterling Hill and Franklin. First identified by Baum in 1960." Associated with "calcozincite".


Nevertheless it seems that collectors attributed "anthophyllite" to the Buckwheat Dolomite as well - at least ca 1970.


Frondel's list of Buckwheat Dolomite species (1972) was: albite, anatase, anglesite, apatite, barite, brookite, calcite, celestite, dolomite, franklinite, goethite, graphite, greenockite, gypsum, hematite, hemimorphite, heulandite, ilmenite, manganite, millerite, pyrite, pyrrhotite, quartz, rutile, siderite, sphalerite, stilpnomelane, talc, zircon.


I think that any list made today would differ substantially - with additions, subtractions and re-definitions. But Frondel's list probably gives a good idea of the environment. (Note however, that there are several "scaly" minerals in the Dolomite that don't seem to match anything on the Mindat Buckwheat Pit list.)


Warren Cummings proposed a genetic model in The Picking Table (Vol 29, #2, 1988), but only mentions a few specific minerals and that "as many as 41 minerals have been listed ..."


My take is that anthophyllite should probably have never been attributed to the Buckwheat Dolomite in the first place. But I don't really know the history behind this particular attribution. As for anthophyllite at Franklin in general, I can find no explanation of why it has disappeared from the list(s).


Which leaves me with my original question: "What is it?" :-)


Modris

12th May 2012 07:53 UTCOlav Revheim Manager

Modris,


Thank you for your detailed account on the "Buckwheat dolomite". To me, Frondel's description of anthophyllite as occuring with tremolite and serpentine in slickensides seems in line with how the mineral occurs other places. I think that a "erroneously reported" status might be considered for anthophyllite at the Buckwheat Pit, although "Mark Germine and John H. Puffer(1981): Distribution of asbestos in the bedrock of the northern New Jersey area, Environmental Geology Volume 3, Number 6 (1981), 337-351 might shed a light on the occurence of anthophyllite in Franklin. The abstract is available here.


I am afraid that I will not be of much help with your "what is it?" question though.


Olav

12th May 2012 14:13 UTCRalph S Bottrill 🌟 Manager

I agree anthophyllite is pretty doubtful in this assemblage, it may be tremolite?

12th May 2012 14:25 UTCModris Baum 🌟 Expert

Olav & Ralph,


Thanks for your responses.


How about actinolite (as in "byssolite")? At least it is on the current Buckwheat Pit list.


Modris

22nd May 2012 20:25 UTCOlav Revheim Manager

Modris,


If what you have is an amphibole, calling it byssolite in the meaning "fibrous or hair-like amphibole formed under relative moderate P/T conditions and of tremolite or actinolite composition" would probably be as close as you will get on this one.


I'm not sure if there are any other agicular, white minerals from the Buckwheat Dolomite that it may be though.


Olav

22nd May 2012 21:28 UTCModris Baum 🌟 Expert

Thanks Olav,


I'm probably going to leave it as undetermined. While actinolite is listed for this environment I don't know what it looks like here so I don't want to muddy the waters.


It's not a big deal for me. I was just curious if anyone knew what happened to the supposed "anthophyllite". Seems like it went as quietly as it came,


Modris

23rd May 2012 01:52 UTCPeter Chin Expert

Modris,


I don't think I have ever seen a verified anthophyllite from the Buckwheat Dolomite and may have been wishful hallucination of prior collectors. As you may know the amphibole, magnesioriebeckite does occur in the dolomite and there are many examples of this in private and public collections, e.g., Franklin Mineral Museum. The actinolite from the dolomite is normally a compact fibrous mass. I want to add that the actinolite was not, to my knowledge, analyzed.


Your white acicular crystals may well be a carbonate like aragonite or sulfate like barite or celestine.


Peter

23rd May 2012 02:09 UTCModris Baum 🌟 Expert

Hi Peter,


Thanks for the info. It's what I was fishing for. I'll try so HCl to see if the stuff vanishes. (Although - truth to tell - I was more intrigued by the "anthophyllite" ID than by the specimen itself.)


Modris


PS Yes - I have seen the magnesioriebeckite. In fact I found some many years ago. Quite different looking stuff.
 
Mineral and/or Locality  
Mindat Discussions Facebook Logo Instagram Logo Discord Logo
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: April 19, 2024 22:25:16
Go to top of page