|
|
Welcome!
Charlesite? Franklin NJ |
Posted by Modris Baum
|
|
Charlesite? Franklin NJ May 18, 2012 04:24PM |
|
Registered: 5 years ago Posts: 608 |
|
Re: Charlesite? Franklin NJ May 23, 2012 01:06AM |
Registered: 5 years ago Posts: 98 |
Charlesite is fluorescent and so is Clinohedrite, although not all clinohedrite is fluorescent. Matrix looks like axinite? I can't see the hexagonal symmetry but that is probably do to my eyes and the photo so I lean towards clinohedrite and quite possibly datolite. Put a UV lamp on it.
Peter
Peter
|
|
Re: Charlesite? Franklin NJ May 23, 2012 01:19AM |
|
Registered: 5 years ago Posts: 608 |
Hi Peter,
Well - I did try UV. That's how I knew it wasn't willemite (of which there are a few rather strangely shaped "xls" in this material). But I didn't see any response at all - neither orange clinohedrite nor blue charlesite nor cream from a gypsum coating. But I concluded that the thing was just too small to tell (except for no willemite of course).
Anyway - thanks for the input. It's nothing important - just trying to empty out my UK boxes.
Modris
Well - I did try UV. That's how I knew it wasn't willemite (of which there are a few rather strangely shaped "xls" in this material). But I didn't see any response at all - neither orange clinohedrite nor blue charlesite nor cream from a gypsum coating. But I concluded that the thing was just too small to tell (except for no willemite of course).
Anyway - thanks for the input. It's nothing important - just trying to empty out my UK boxes.
Modris
|
Re: Charlesite? Franklin NJ May 23, 2012 03:10AM |
Registered: 5 years ago Posts: 98 |
|
|
Re: Charlesite? Franklin NJ May 23, 2012 03:28AM |
|
Registered: 5 years ago Posts: 608 |
Hi Peter,
Well - Fig 140 is a pretty complex crystal so you'd have to simplify it to match this guy.
But the main problem I have in thinking datolite is that (in my experience) the datolite xls in this environment are very glassy and nearly transparent. The one charlesite that I do have (a much larger xl that was kindly glued next to a clinohedrite by one of the previous owners) is opaque. Of course that's probably due to the gypsum coating.
Anyway - don't knock yourself out. It's not that important. But maybe I'll take a crack at exposing the xl better. What have I got to lose?
Modris
Well - Fig 140 is a pretty complex crystal so you'd have to simplify it to match this guy.
But the main problem I have in thinking datolite is that (in my experience) the datolite xls in this environment are very glassy and nearly transparent. The one charlesite that I do have (a much larger xl that was kindly glued next to a clinohedrite by one of the previous owners) is opaque. Of course that's probably due to the gypsum coating.
Anyway - don't knock yourself out. It's not that important. But maybe I'll take a crack at exposing the xl better. What have I got to lose?
Modris
|
Re: Charlesite? Franklin NJ May 23, 2012 10:37AM |
|
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 3,162 |
|
|
Re: Charlesite? Franklin NJ May 23, 2012 03:47PM |
|
Registered: 5 years ago Posts: 608 |
Copyright © Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau 1993-2013. Site Map. Locality, mineral & photograph data are the copyright of the individuals who submitted them. Site hosted & developed by Jolyon Ralph.
Mindat.org is an online information resource dedicated to providing free mineralogical information to all. Mindat relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Mindat does not offer minerals for sale. If you would like to add information to improve the quality of our database, then click here
to register.
Current server date and time: June 20, 2013 06:17:22
Current server date and time: June 20, 2013 06:17:22
Mindat Lightbox
Options| Fade toolbar when not in focus | Fix toolbar to bottom of page | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hide Social Media Links | |||
| Slideshow frame delay | seconds | ||



















