Help|Log In|Register|
Home PageMindat NewsThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusManagement TeamContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatSponsor a PageSponsored PagesTop Available PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on MindatThe Mindat Store
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryRandom MineralSearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
StatisticsThe ElementsMember ListBooks & MagazinesMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryHow to Link to MindatDevice Settings
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day Gallery
Modris Baum May 18, 2012 04:24PM
Click the photo TN at top for more info.

Franklin experts - any ideas?

Thanks - Modris
Peter Chin May 23, 2012 01:06AM
Charlesite is fluorescent and so is Clinohedrite, although not all clinohedrite is fluorescent. Matrix looks like axinite? I can't see the hexagonal symmetry but that is probably do to my eyes and the photo so I lean towards clinohedrite and quite possibly datolite. Put a UV lamp on it.

Modris Baum May 23, 2012 01:19AM
Hi Peter,

Well - I did try UV. That's how I knew it wasn't willemite (of which there are a few rather strangely shaped "xls" in this material). But I didn't see any response at all - neither orange clinohedrite nor blue charlesite nor cream from a gypsum coating. But I concluded that the thing was just too small to tell (except for no willemite of course).

Anyway - thanks for the input. It's nothing important - just trying to empty out my UK boxes.

Peter Chin May 23, 2012 03:10AM
Take a look at Fig 140 of Palache. Datolite?
Modris Baum May 23, 2012 03:28AM
Hi Peter,

Well - Fig 140 is a pretty complex crystal so you'd have to simplify it to match this guy.

But the main problem I have in thinking datolite is that (in my experience) the datolite xls in this environment are very glassy and nearly transparent. The one charlesite that I do have (a much larger xl that was kindly glued next to a clinohedrite by one of the previous owners) is opaque. Of course that's probably due to the gypsum coating.

Anyway - don't knock yourself out. It's not that important. But maybe I'll take a crack at exposing the xl better. What have I got to lose?

Chester S. Lemanski, Jr. May 23, 2012 10:37AM
My impression is that it is a datolite.

Modris Baum May 23, 2012 03:47PM
Chet & Peter

OK. I'm being convinced. If you simplify Fig 140 it does resemble my xl.

I don't think I'm going to post it as datolite - it's not exactly a good example! But I think I can take one more thing out of the UK boxes.

Thanks - Modrisd
Your Email:

Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically. If the code is hard to read, then just try to guess it right. If you enter the wrong code, a new image is created and you get another chance to enter it right.
Your message:
  • Valid attachments: jpg, gif, png, pdf
  • No file can be larger than 1000 KB
  • 3 more file(s) can be attached to this message

Mineral and/or Locality is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2016, except where stated. relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us Current server date and time: December 6, 2016 00:45:52
Go to top of page