|
|
Welcome!
"Angel wing" calcite... Locality?
Posted by Michael J. Bainbridge
|
"Angel wing" calcite... Locality? February 03, 2010 10:54PM |
|
Registered: 6 years ago Posts: 346 |
Anybody know where this might have come from?
It is from the collection of the Canadian Museum of Nature in Ottawa, specimen #35435.
Labeled as: "angel wing" calcite, Locality unknown.
Close-up of re-crystallized surface:
Thanks,
Michael
It is from the collection of the Canadian Museum of Nature in Ottawa, specimen #35435.
Labeled as: "angel wing" calcite, Locality unknown.
Close-up of re-crystallized surface:
Thanks,
Michael
|
Anonymous User
Re: "Angel wing" calcite... Locality? February 04, 2010 01:58AM |
|
Re: "Angel wing" calcite... Locality? February 04, 2010 04:31AM |
|
Registered: 6 years ago Posts: 346 |
Certainly, but the formation is rather unusual - fluid etching of massive calcite with later re-crystallization, it would seem.
Oh yes, I should say that it's BIG too. Small things like this might be fairly common (although I've never seen one), but it might help to know that it's 25cm tall. FOV on the CU is 8.6cm x 5.8.
No, a guess certainly won't do. I just thought that somebody might say, "ah, yes. I remember in 1967 when Tucson was flooded with these things from..." Or something like that. I would never attach a definite location to it (neither, I'm sure, would Michel), but I thought I'd throw it out there in hopes of being able to put a "probably from..." on the photo.
We'll see...
Oh yes, I should say that it's BIG too. Small things like this might be fairly common (although I've never seen one), but it might help to know that it's 25cm tall. FOV on the CU is 8.6cm x 5.8.
No, a guess certainly won't do. I just thought that somebody might say, "ah, yes. I remember in 1967 when Tucson was flooded with these things from..." Or something like that. I would never attach a definite location to it (neither, I'm sure, would Michel), but I thought I'd throw it out there in hopes of being able to put a "probably from..." on the photo.
We'll see...
|
Anonymous User
Re: "Angel wing" calcite... Locality? February 04, 2010 02:43PM |
|
Re: "Angel wing" calcite... Locality? February 04, 2010 03:29PM |
|
Registered: 6 years ago Posts: 346 |
|
Re: "Angel wing" calcite... Locality? February 04, 2010 04:45PM |
|
Registered: 5 years ago Posts: 2,749 |
|
Re: "Angel wing" calcite... Locality? February 04, 2010 05:41PM |
|
Registered: 6 years ago Posts: 346 |
|
|
Re: "Angel wing" calcite... Locality? February 04, 2010 07:24PM |
|
Registered: 4 years ago Posts: 1,580 |
[www.mindat.org]
some time to kill this afternoon, so I'm searching the database, Michael... what do you think of the attached? It's also a unique form, though certainly not of the same scale
some time to kill this afternoon, so I'm searching the database, Michael... what do you think of the attached? It's also a unique form, though certainly not of the same scale
|
Re: "Angel wing" calcite... Locality? February 04, 2010 08:54PM |
|
Registered: 6 years ago Posts: 346 |
Wow, you must have had A LOT of time on your hands to search calcite in the db! Thanks!
I'm inclined to say that that specimen, although visually similar, would have formed differently. Those look like stacked, modified rhombs, similar to the saddle shapes we often see in dolomite. Certainly an unusual form, but it appears to be fairly standard deposition on matrix. ie, the calcite formed that shape as it crystallized.
The museum specimen however, appears to have been etched into that shape (starting from massive calcite and dissolved, roughly along the cleavage planes, into that form). The surface xls then formed over the etched base as the solution cooled. The etched calcite "wing" shape would be analogous to the matrix, and the surface texture the crystal deposition.
At least, that's my uneducated guess.
So, it's actually the unusual form of the 'matrix' which I think might be diagnostic, not the crystals themselves.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/04/2010 09:03PM by Michael Bainbridge.
I'm inclined to say that that specimen, although visually similar, would have formed differently. Those look like stacked, modified rhombs, similar to the saddle shapes we often see in dolomite. Certainly an unusual form, but it appears to be fairly standard deposition on matrix. ie, the calcite formed that shape as it crystallized.
The museum specimen however, appears to have been etched into that shape (starting from massive calcite and dissolved, roughly along the cleavage planes, into that form). The surface xls then formed over the etched base as the solution cooled. The etched calcite "wing" shape would be analogous to the matrix, and the surface texture the crystal deposition.
At least, that's my uneducated guess.
So, it's actually the unusual form of the 'matrix' which I think might be diagnostic, not the crystals themselves.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/04/2010 09:03PM by Michael Bainbridge.
|
james jjjj
Re: "Angel wing" calcite... Locality? February 25, 2012 11:03PM |
|
Re: "Angel wing" calcite... Locality? May 05, 2012 05:23PM |
Registered: 5 years ago Posts: 58 |
Copyright © Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau 1993-2013. Site Map.
Locality, mineral & photograph data are the copyright of the individuals who submitted them. Site hosted & developed by Jolyon Ralph.
Mindat.org is an online information resource dedicated to providing free mineralogical information to all. Mindat relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Mindat does not offer minerals for sale. If you would like to add information to improve the quality of our database, then click here
to register.
Current server date and time: 23rd May 2013 14:35:11
Current server date and time: 23rd May 2013 14:35:11
Mindat Lightbox
Options| Fade toolbar when not in focus | Fix toolbar to bottom of page | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hide Social Media Links | |||
| Slideshow frame delay | seconds | ||



















