Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography
╳Discussions
💬 Home🔎 Search📅 LatestGroups
EducationOpen discussion area.Fakes & FraudsOpen discussion area.Field CollectingOpen discussion area.FossilsOpen discussion area.Gems and GemologyOpen discussion area.GeneralOpen discussion area.How to ContributeOpen discussion area.Identity HelpOpen discussion area.Improving Mindat.orgOpen discussion area.LocalitiesOpen discussion area.Lost and Stolen SpecimensOpen discussion area.MarketplaceOpen discussion area.MeteoritesOpen discussion area.Mindat ProductsOpen discussion area.Mineral ExchangesOpen discussion area.Mineral PhotographyOpen discussion area.Mineral ShowsOpen discussion area.Mineralogical ClassificationOpen discussion area.Mineralogy CourseOpen discussion area.MineralsOpen discussion area.Minerals and MuseumsOpen discussion area.PhotosOpen discussion area.Techniques for CollectorsOpen discussion area.The Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryOpen discussion area.UV MineralsOpen discussion area.Recent Images in Discussions
Identity HelpPyrite with 20+ elements, micro-fossils and more??
26th Jun 2012 04:45 UTCKen Jones
The elements found to make up the items that I sent to the USGS are, carbon, sulfur, iron, quartz, albite, gypsum, titanium, phosphorous and pure aluminum. The xrf scan detected gold, silver, platinum, palladium, rhodium, iridium, ruthenium, nickel, cobalt, zinc, iron and copper. The edx scan detected sulfur, iron, carbon, oxygen, silicon, phosphorous, potassium, calcium, palladium, aluminium, chromium and pure tungsten. The rock also has this reddish-pink stuff in it that I am told has to be realgar (arsenic). The xrf and the edx scans were not complete scans of the rock, they just scanned a few areas.
The rock stats are as follows:Color-yellow in room light, tin white in sun or bright light, Luster-metallic, Transparency-opaque, Crystal System-isometric and irregular, Crystal Habit-various, Cleveage-indistinct, Fracture-conchoidal to uneven, Hardness-7.5, Specfic Gravity-5.1-5.3 ?, Streak-dark gray to black.
There's a lot more to tell about this rock but I don't want to put anyone to sleep reading this so I will end here. I am posting this to see if anyone out there has ever come across anything like this.
Thank you,
Ken
26th Jun 2012 04:59 UTCKen Jones
26th Jun 2012 09:33 UTCJolyon Ralph Founder
The additional elements are not surprising - most minerals contain trace amounts of many additional elements.
The growth patterns you see on the piece are quite normal for pyrite too.
Jolyon
26th Jun 2012 11:17 UTCPeter Nancarrow 🌟 Expert
You list: "carbon, sulfur, iron, quartz, albite, gypsum, titanium, phosphorous and pure aluminum" as being found in the specimen, but don't say what method was used to detect these, or their relative proportions. Also ", nickel, cobalt, zinc, iron and copper. (detected by XRF) and "sulfur, iron, carbon, oxygen, silicon, phosphorous, potassium, calcium, palladium, aluminium, chromium and pure tungsten" detected by EDS.
It really isn't very meaningful to have long lists of elements and minerals found in a specimen without any information as to the "scale of scrutiny" or quantification of the components listed. By that I mean for instance, were the analytical scans done on the whole specimen, on one or two small chips from it, simply by randomly scanning a small area, or pointing the elctron beam at various points? What were the apparent relative proportions of those components at each of the points analysed?
That is an extraordinarily wide-ranging list of components from what looks like a fairly ordinary pyrite specimen, and without the sort of analytical technique information asked for above, or quantification of the data, any interpretation is little more than guesswork, and to be frank, not really worth the effort or expense for such a specimen.
However, as an exercise, here is an example of a few steps one might take to begin to untangle such a chaotic mass of data from a specimen which made such work worthwhile:
1) It is quite obviously and unequivocally a "common pyrite" specimen. Hence expect Fe and S to be by far and away the predominant elements present in any bulk analysis of such a specimen.
2) In your first list, quartz, albite and gypsum are not elements, but minerals, none of which is rare, and all of which commonly occur associated with pyrite. They will account for the Al, Si, O, and Ca, found in the specimen. C, if locally associated with Ca and O, probably represents calcite. If not associated with any element heavier than Na, then it's probaly organic. The K is also likely to be present in feldspar.
3) Regarding the ". . . reddish-pink stuff in it that I am told has to be realgar (arsenic)" There is absolutely no evidence for that. Realgar is certainly not the only red mineral, and none of the analytical scans detected arsenic! -think again.
4) The specimen may have been muddy when found (extraneous mud is a common first source of contamination). Dust from anything else which had previously been in the same bag, box, or wrapping paper used is another common source. Cleaning materials might introduce surface traces P, Cl, or B etc.
5) Consider the fact that it is extremely unlikely to find elements such as gold, silver, platinum, palladium, rhodium, iridium, ruthenium, chromium and tungsten in such a specimen in anything more that the minutest traces.
6) Ask your analyst(s) for details of the analytical techniques used to gather the data (scale of scrutiny, number of scans etc), and for any information regarding at least semi-quantification (XRD count rates, EDS relative peak heights etc). Given sufficient counting time, modern XRF techniques will find a long list of trace elements in almost any specimen, most of which are very largely irrelevant to the interpretation/identification of a bulk specimen such as this in the absence of knowledge about potential sources of contamination. Unless you can be certain there has been NO contamination of the specimen, eliminate any elements listed as "trace" from further consideration.
7) Review what is left!
Good luck!
Pete N.
26th Jun 2012 11:22 UTCJolyon Ralph Founder
Jolyon
27th Jun 2012 05:36 UTCKen Jones
I don't want to waste much of your time trying to explain something that I can not, there is so much to this rock that it would be difficult for anyone to understand where I'm comimg from without seeing all that I have seen. I started a blog back in March on this thing in the hopes that someone might come across it and know something about it. Please note that I am not here for attention or to promote a blog but if you'd like to see some of the many photos, I will PM the address to you if you would like to check it out.
Best Regards,
Ken
P.S. Pete - I have not had a full scan done on the rock as of yet, just spot checks, the cost for a full scan is out of my reach at the moment but I do plan on having it done.
27th Jun 2012 11:45 UTCJolyon Ralph Founder
You haven't told us anything about the history of this specimen and how it ended up in your hands.
27th Jun 2012 17:33 UTCTim Jokela Jr
That any actual collector, with any knowledge, would indicate that this is something of value that you should not let out of your sight, is a little hard to believe. Were they actually experienced mineral collectors, or were they, say, metal detectorists, gold panners, prospectors, or UFOlogists? Or even geologists, or gemologists... they can have lots of letters after their name, but very few actually collect or study minerals to the extent that the maniacal collectors on this forum do.
We can assure you a thousand times that you have a $2 piece of pyrite, but you won't believe us.
There are no micro fossils inside of it, there is nothing unusual about some of it breaking away and looking clean... it is not in fact an alien artifact. I've seen this before, people that are new to the hobby find a piece of slag or mica, and are convinced it's gold or a priceless meteorite, or somebody sends a black rock to a dubious lab and they say it's platinum, or a vaguely round rock is surely a fossil skull.
Not unusual in other fields, eg: antiques; where somebody that has never read a book on antiques digs up an old sideboard from gramma's attic and is positive it's a priceless Louis 14th piece, when in fact it's from IKEA, and the experts explain this on Antiques Roadshow, but you can see that the person will never believe it.
Don't bankrupt yourself getting further useless analytical work done... Put the piece on a shelf and admire it, and if you're really interested, join a local rock club, go to shows, and buy some books. It's a great hobby, and you'll find many strange and wonderful minerals are out there. Start with pyrite, it's a great mineral.
27th Jun 2012 18:15 UTCAnonymous User
Before you asked mindat, has anyone told you that what you have is a typical Peruvian pyrite specimen? The people that you have asked - what do they believe, what do they know, and what agenda might they have?
I'm not an expert. But I'm sure that any given specimen contains (in its substance or as dirt, dust, clay, or packing soap!?!) minute traces of all kinds of strange-sounding elements. Also, I'm sure that the instruments and methods for analysis can produce readings that can be interpreted to indicate that some really exotic element is present in beyond-miniscule amount when it is not.
I have several Peruvian pyrite specimens that look just like yours. I'm sure if I asked the right people (and was willing to pay when necessary), I could get similar results to what you have. That doesn't change the fact that it is a pyrite specimen.
I'm not disparaging your specimen in any way. Pyrite is one of the most collected minerals, and the specimens from Peru are very attractive. Enjoy it for what it is.
28th Jun 2012 06:32 UTCKen Jones
I have contacted several high profile people with PHD's on this, even someone from Nasa and most say that if it's not something man made than they simple can not explain it because of all the different metals and the micro structures. All I can do is show some of what I have seen and let the photos speak for themselves. This could be some high school kids science project that got tossed out for all I know, all I wanted to know was, what is this stuff in the rock and where can I go to read about it. I don't care if this is a worthless piece of pyrite, I just would like to know what this stuff is and why it's in what looks like everyday pyrite and so far nooooooo one can explain it. I have been told by a Professor back east that the reason that no one can say what this stuff is, is because maybe this is the first time that human eye have seen this stuff.
I have tons of photos but I can only post three at a time so I will share a few and if anyone has found anything like this in pyrite before, please let me know. The last couple of photos has a blog address where there are several photos of acid test strange results and more. If you can explain any of this, feel free to email me with info.
Thanks All,
Ken
28th Jun 2012 06:46 UTCKen Jones
In these photos are something that's from one of the hole in the rock where it looked as it there was something melted and splattered on the crystals in the hole. Pyrite from what I've read is not known to melt but will burn, but there was some melted metallic like substance on the crystals. This is something from that area.
28th Jun 2012 06:58 UTCKen Jones
Keep in mind that all of this stuff is very microscopic, most can noit be seen with tyhe naked eye, the photos were taken with a digital microscope at 40x-160x. A lot of this stuff will give off a pure white glow when backlit wiht a bright, I can only guess that it is because of the phosphorous that was detected in the rock.
28th Jun 2012 07:11 UTCKen Jones
The last photo is of something that I am told could be some sort of micro fossil, it is about 0.5mm long at my best guess. It's one of two that I am told could be conodont elements. I posted photos of both on the Natural History Musuem of London. No one can say for sure what they are and why they are in this rock. I have been told that this rock could very well be a part of earths history that very little is known about.
28th Jun 2012 07:40 UTCDan R. Lynch
My family owns a rock shop and we constantly have excited rock hounds coming in to show us the "meteorite" they found. These "meteorites" are invariably magnetite. What I'm trying to say is: assume your specimens are something common until proven otherwise -- not the other way around. Most of the little things you've found on this piece seem to merely be organic or other contaminants that certainly did not form with the pyrite, but came later.
28th Jun 2012 08:09 UTCJolyon Ralph Founder
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: March 29, 2024 06:39:23
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: March 29, 2024 06:39:23