Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Identity HelpJapan Law Smoky Quartz w/ Aegirine? Malawi

5th Feb 2015 00:39 UTCIan Whitlock

03485810016040770619727.jpg
I recently purchased this specimen at the Gem Show and I was wondering if you would consider this a Japan Law Twin Quartz or not? It looks to be a little to obtuse of an angle for it to be considered a Japan Law, but i'd like to hear some other thoughts on this.


Thanks,

-Ian



5th Feb 2015 01:01 UTCsteven garza

Dear Ian;


Have you ever heard the saying, "can't see the forest for the trees"? We/I need some more shots, but, the xl you THINK is a Japan twin (the one up front) to the one on the behind left, isn't; HOWEVER, the one lower right behind may be one to the left one! Looking at the striations on the 3, you were correct about it being at the wrong angle; as I was looking at that one, thinking the one lower right behind was part of the left behind, I saw the striations didn't match, plus, those do appear to be at the correct angle. What is needed are pics from above, as well as from behind & side-on to the right hand of specimen, as you've got it pictured. So you know, that regardless of how the xls are shaped, the striations show the true orientation of the C axises.

6th Feb 2015 18:50 UTCIan Whitlock

04990920016040770637808.jpg
Here's a couple more pictures. Hopefully this helps.


03579630015667504934337.jpg

6th Feb 2015 22:30 UTCDavid K. Joyce Expert

I'm afraid not! Just a couple of weird-shaped (nice) shards.


David K. Joyce

7th Feb 2015 16:24 UTCD. Peck

David, I don't think they are shards, but are flattened crystals. The blades seem to be separate crystals and not twinned.

8th Feb 2015 03:22 UTCIan Whitlock

Oh Well! Its a pretty cool specimen none-the-less. Im happy with it :-D

8th Feb 2015 03:41 UTCDavid K. Joyce Expert

Well, they may be flat quartz crystals. I've seen many shards-originated crystals over the years, that have continued to "grow" beautifully after the crystal/pocket shattering event and look very similar to those. Weird, interesting shapes with little or no point of attachment.


David K. Joyce
 
Mineral and/or Locality  
Mindat Discussions Facebook Logo Instagram Logo Discord Logo
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: April 19, 2024 19:51:46
Go to top of page