|
|
Welcome!
Cold Light unit.
Posted by Stephen Eglinton (2)
|
|
Re: Cold Light unit. June 13, 2012 04:23PM |
Registered: 1 year ago Posts: 654 |
Steve,
That's a path to the desktop folder on your PC. Interesting but not a lot of use
If you can e-mail a copy privately to Gene, perhaps he would be so kind as to put it on his site and post a URL to it here?
It's an interesting thread. I've also pondered for a while on the (in)efficiency of coupling in my 150W halogen light box. I think it unlikely that the coupling can be more efficient than about 20%
If that's about right then the lower output LED approach should clearly deliver more payload onto the target.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/13/2012 04:28PM by Owen Lewis (2).
That's a path to the desktop folder on your PC. Interesting but not a lot of use
If you can e-mail a copy privately to Gene, perhaps he would be so kind as to put it on his site and post a URL to it here?
It's an interesting thread. I've also pondered for a while on the (in)efficiency of coupling in my 150W halogen light box. I think it unlikely that the coupling can be more efficient than about 20%
If that's about right then the lower output LED approach should clearly deliver more payload onto the target.Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/13/2012 04:28PM by Owen Lewis (2).
|
|
Re: Cold Light unit. June 13, 2012 04:26PM |
Registered: 1 year ago Posts: 654 |
|
Re: Cold Light unit. June 13, 2012 06:34PM |
Registered: 3 years ago Posts: 69 |
Hi Steve,
I came across the problem of not getting enough light out of the IKEA LED lamps on an excursion. We sorted that by fixing a 10x lens in front of the lamp to focus the light more tightly. That worked really nicely and may be the cheapest option to illuminate micromounts. As we were on excursion we just used sticky tape - and we had a well focused light beam that enabled us to see tiny things with our old excursion microscope (that just sucks up light...).
Best Regards
Holger
I came across the problem of not getting enough light out of the IKEA LED lamps on an excursion. We sorted that by fixing a 10x lens in front of the lamp to focus the light more tightly. That worked really nicely and may be the cheapest option to illuminate micromounts. As we were on excursion we just used sticky tape - and we had a well focused light beam that enabled us to see tiny things with our old excursion microscope (that just sucks up light...).
Best Regards
Holger
|
|
Re: Cold Light unit. June 14, 2012 02:45AM |
|
Registered: 3 years ago Posts: 676 |
[www.homedepot.com] 12 volt, wide even light, and a natural color, and bright as well. I made one into a headlamp and it is way better than any of my other ones. It is dimmable by reducing the voltage, and the light is cool.
|
Greglee
Re: Cold Light unit. November 29, 2012 06:09AM |
I am using led-source fiber illuminator. My experience tells me that it can not introduce more light from a source like a light bulb to an optical fiber that the optical power that an area of the source (filament) equal to the area of the optical fiber core emits within the NA of the optical fiber. So, the best way to introduce light from a white source to a fiber is to put the fiber very near the fillament or (better) try to use a lens to produce a 1:1 image of the filament and put the fiber there.
|
|
Re: Cold Light unit. November 29, 2012 10:37AM |
Registered: 1 year ago Posts: 654 |
Why a 1:1 image? Given (say) a single 600um fibre core, ideally, would you not want all the light gathered and concentrated into a spot of not greater than 600um diameter at the fibre termination?
That said, some cold light gooseneck systems (like one of mine) do not transmit the light via a single fibre but rather through an approx 5-6mm bundle of such fibres.
None of the systems I use (QH(2) and Xenon arc (1)) utilises a lens system to improve the efficiency of light capture, using no more than elliptical(?) reflectors. Accordingly, all are quite lossy. They do the job though.
That said, some cold light gooseneck systems (like one of mine) do not transmit the light via a single fibre but rather through an approx 5-6mm bundle of such fibres.
None of the systems I use (QH(2) and Xenon arc (1)) utilises a lens system to improve the efficiency of light capture, using no more than elliptical(?) reflectors. Accordingly, all are quite lossy. They do the job though.
Copyright © Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau 1993-2013. Site Map.
Locality, mineral & photograph data are the copyright of the individuals who submitted them. Site hosted & developed by Jolyon Ralph.
Mindat.org is an online information resource dedicated to providing free mineralogical information to all. Mindat relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Mindat does not offer minerals for sale. If you would like to add information to improve the quality of our database, then click here
to register.
Current server date and time: 23rd May 2013 21:04:58
Current server date and time: 23rd May 2013 21:04:58
Mindat Lightbox
Options| Fade toolbar when not in focus | Fix toolbar to bottom of page | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hide Social Media Links | |||
| Slideshow frame delay | seconds | ||
Locality Updated: Osterberg district, Gernrode, Harz, Saxony-Anhalt, GermanyFrom Thomas Lühr, 23rd May 2013 20:53:42




















