Mindat Logo
bannerbannerbannerbanner
Welcome!

Advanced

New IMA approved minerals and nomenclature changes

Posted by Jim Ferraiolo  
avatar Re: New IMA approved minerals and nomenclature changes
October 10, 2009 09:22AM
au    
So I infer that the non Fe- and Na-dominant species with monoclinic structure will be defined as more new species? It seems very unfortunate that we are defining minerals that can only be confirmed with high resolution single crystal XRD. The tourmaline group is difficult enough already, and I guess this will spur the move to call them all "tourmaline" unless we do single crystal work. Its moving mineral identification out of the capacity of average mineralogists, let along petrologists and geologists. I doubt if there will be enough crystallographers around to handle the influx of people wanting their tourmalines re-identified.

Ralph



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/10/2009 09:36AM by Ralph Bottrill.
Author:

Your Email:


Subject:


Attachments:
  • Valid attachments: jpg, gif, png, pdf
  • No file can be larger than 1000 KB
  • 3 more file(s) can be attached to this message

Message:

Mineral and/or Locality
Google
 
www.mindat.org Web
Copyright © Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau 1993-2009. Site Map. Locality, mineral & photograph data are the copyright of the individuals who submitted them.Further information contact the Site hosted & developed by Jolyon Ralph. Mindat.org is an online information resource dedicated to providing free mineralogical information to all. Mindat relies on the contributions of hundreds of members and supporters. If you would like to add information to improve the quality of our database, then click here to register. Current server date and time: 26th Nov 2009 00:21:49