Mindat Logo
bannerbannerbannerbanner
Welcome!

Location Maps Pages Could Use A Change

Posted by William W Besse  
avatar Location Maps Pages Could Use A Change
December 17, 2011 01:11AM
us    
The Location Maps pages format could use a change to make them more user friendly. I sometimes like to do map research outside of Mindat, so I copy the Latitude & Longitude out and paste it in other map browsers, usually Google Maps or Google Earth, but I have tried this on MSN Maps and Yahoo! Maps as well.

None of these sites would use the WGS84 format so I will talk no further on that one for this purpose. I did reach Manila, Philippines a couple of times when I put in the WGS84 for "Red Cloud Mine, Silver District, Trigo Mts, La Paz Co., Arizona, USA", but that was about it.

Google Maps, Google Earth, MSN Maps and Yahoo! Maps do not like the other formats either..."AS IS". The problem is the central colon (:). If this is replaced by a comma (,) then they work and you get where you want to go.

Well they don't all work alike. Yahoo! renders the Decimal Degrees but not the Degrees plus Decimal Minutes and the Decimal Degrees was off in location by a kilometer or more (Again using the Red Cloud). I would just ignore Yahoo! Maps.

My suggestion would be to format the Location Maps pages Latitude & Longitude with a comma.

Bill
avatar Re: Location Maps Pages Could Use A Change
December 17, 2011 01:56AM
> None of these sites would use the WGS84 format

The WGS84 datum is used by Google Maps. It's one of the reasons why we've standardized on it.

I've changed the maps.php page to use a comma.

Jolyon
avatar Re: Location Maps Pages Could Use A Change
December 17, 2011 02:51AM
us    
Thanks for the change, Jolyon

You say that Google Maps uses the WGS84, but when I copy and paste it into Google Maps it does not work. Is it used on the back-end but not the front?

Bill
avatar Re: Location Maps Pages Could Use A Change
December 17, 2011 02:57AM
Perhaps our coordinates are wrong.
avatar Re: Location Maps Pages Could Use A Change
December 17, 2011 02:59AM
Personally, I never use the standard datums such as WGS84, NAD27, etc... in favour of UTM coordinates. For my line of work, they are far more accurate than any of the lat/long readings.
avatar Re: Location Maps Pages Could Use A Change
December 17, 2011 04:32AM
us    
Many thanks for the comma, Jolyon! Today is a good day for OCD mineral location researchers.
avatar Re: Location Maps Pages Could Use A Change
December 17, 2011 07:40AM
I agree with Paul that most jurisdictions have moved to UTM coordinates and maybe we should show them also. There would be a need to show the datum and grid used though. Lat/longs are simpler on a world-wide scale.

Regards,
Ralph
Author:

Subject:


Attachments:
  • Valid attachments: jpg, gif, png, pdf
  • No file can be larger than 1000 KB
  • 3 more file(s) can be attached to this message

Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically. If the code is hard to read, then just try to guess it right. If you enter the wrong code, a new image is created and you get another chance to enter it right.
CAPTCHA
Message:

Mineral and/or Locality  
Search Google  
Copyright © Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau 1993-2014. Site Map. Locality, mineral & photograph data are the copyright of the individuals who submitted them. Site hosted & developed by Jolyon Ralph. Mindat.org is an online information resource dedicated to providing free mineralogical information to all. Mindat relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Mindat does not offer minerals for sale. If you would like to add information to improve the quality of our database, then click here to register.
Current server date and time: April 21, 2014 12:18:01
Mineral and Locality Search
Mineral:
and/or Locality:
Options
Fade toolbar when not in focusFix toolbar to bottom of page
Hide Social Media Links
Slideshow frame delay seconds