Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography
╳Discussions
💬 Home🔎 Search📅 LatestGroups
EducationOpen discussion area.Fakes & FraudsOpen discussion area.Field CollectingOpen discussion area.FossilsOpen discussion area.Gems and GemologyOpen discussion area.GeneralOpen discussion area.How to ContributeOpen discussion area.Identity HelpOpen discussion area.Improving Mindat.orgOpen discussion area.LocalitiesOpen discussion area.Lost and Stolen SpecimensOpen discussion area.MarketplaceOpen discussion area.MeteoritesOpen discussion area.Mindat ProductsOpen discussion area.Mineral ExchangesOpen discussion area.Mineral PhotographyOpen discussion area.Mineral ShowsOpen discussion area.Mineralogical ClassificationOpen discussion area.Mineralogy CourseOpen discussion area.MineralsOpen discussion area.Minerals and MuseumsOpen discussion area.PhotosOpen discussion area.Techniques for CollectorsOpen discussion area.The Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryOpen discussion area.UV MineralsOpen discussion area.Recent Images in Discussions
Field CollectingIs Schorl worth collecting?
12th Jul 2014 19:58 UTCRyan Allen
http://i864.photobucket.com/albums/ab209/billycap4u/20140712_112544_2_bestshot.jpg
http://i864.photobucket.com/albums/ab209/billycap4u/20140712_112611_2_bestshot.jpg
12th Jul 2014 20:23 UTCReiner Mielke Expert
12th Jul 2014 21:09 UTCRyan Allen
http://i864.photobucket.com/albums/ab209/billycap4u/WInter%20Rockhounding/20140103_112345.jpg
13th Jul 2014 00:14 UTCDon Swenson
13th Jul 2014 04:00 UTCBob Harman
With schorl and other relatively common and/or well crystallized minerals most experienced field collectors might take home "nice appearing" specimens, then prepare them, and then only keep one or several of the best finds. These, of course, would be those of good crystallization and color and esthetics. All others would be disposed of in various ways. On the other hand, novice field collectors or those going to a site for the first time bring home lots of "stuff", usually of all qualities and then tend to keep much or all of it. Experience usually changes that as way too much "stuff" becomes accumulated.
With other more complex, rare or rarely well crystalized mineral specimens there would have to be allowances used for each mineral. Clearly some are virtually never found crystalized or large or esthetically pleasing and displayable. These would have to be collected as one finds them. But as I noted, many collector minerals are well crystallized and showy and only these should be saved after the field trip. Other lesser quality examples should be given away as the total accumulated mass grows bigger and bigger.
The money value part of "worth" is another story. CHEERS…..BOB
13th Jul 2014 08:36 UTCRyan Allen
-------------------------------------------------------
> Schorl of the quality in your photo qualifies as
> garden rock. At other sites it can occur as
> well-defined, terminated, lustrous black crystals.
> These may not command killer prices but are
> certainly collectible.
Thank you Don. This was the answer i was looking for
13th Jul 2014 09:17 UTCRock Currier Expert
13th Jul 2014 09:37 UTCRyan Allen
13th Jul 2014 09:40 UTCRock Currier Expert
13th Jul 2014 12:23 UTCKnut Eldjarn 🌟 Manager
Are you sure it is schorl ? Your first pictures could indicate a mineral with a good cleavage like an amphibole (60 & 120 * angles). Both schorl and amphibole can be rock-forming minerals but amphiboles more often.
I think the others have answered your question. Schorl as such is just as collectible as most other common minerals (i.e. Quarz, Feldspar, Calcite, Fluorite). It is not collectible by the pound (few except precious metals and gemstones are) - it depends on the degree of crystallization and overall aesthetics of the specimens.
Knut
13th Jul 2014 18:16 UTCAlfredo Petrov Manager
There was an article in Lapis magazine once about all the ridiculous patents taken out for inventions using schorl... Hairdriers? All sorts of crazy stuff, that only worked in the imagination of the inventor, I'm sure.
But you never know, some similar fad might reappear. (Spread the word in China... there's a big market :-D ). If I had a pile of schorl, I certainly wouldn't throw it away.
13th Jul 2014 20:17 UTCRyan Allen
13th Jul 2014 20:48 UTCSpencer Ivan Mather
Spencer
14th Jul 2014 05:44 UTCRyan Allen
http://i864.photobucket.com/albums/ab209/billycap4u/20140713_194258_6_bestshot.jpg
http://i864.photobucket.com/albums/ab209/billycap4u/20140713_194342_5_bestshot.jpg
Here is a close up:
http://i864.photobucket.com/albums/ab209/billycap4u/20140713_200909_4_bestshot.jpg
A few 10x
http://i864.photobucket.com/albums/ab209/billycap4u/20140713_200245.jpg
http://i864.photobucket.com/albums/ab209/billycap4u/20140713_200827_8_bestshot.jpg
http://i864.photobucket.com/albums/ab209/billycap4u/20140713_202142_7_bestshot.jpg
http://i864.photobucket.com/albums/ab209/billycap4u/20140713_202333_8_bestshot.jpg
I dug into some unused photos i have of that area:
http://i864.photobucket.com/albums/ab209/billycap4u/20140704_104710_1_bestshot.jpg
http://i864.photobucket.com/albums/ab209/billycap4u/The%20Lake/20140704_114359_8_bestshot.jpg
http://i864.photobucket.com/albums/ab209/billycap4u/The%20Lake/20140704_114335_3_bestshot.jpg
I also come across a lot stuff that looks like this in the very same location:
http://i864.photobucket.com/albums/ab209/billycap4u/20140628_170123_2_bestshot.jpg
In the last pic the base mineral this pocket is in is everywhere and its either a very dark green or jet black. Its very hard to get a solid pic of this material as its almost like it has a thousand faceted faces that have been melted together and it refracts light in different spots at any angle and messes with my focus. It looks great till you break some off and feel the weight and its one of the few minerals i come across that looks better weathered as the freshly broken stuff appears rusty. No matter how many times you break it the specimen still shows many flat shinny and never breaks cleanly.
http://i864.photobucket.com/albums/ab209/billycap4u/The%20Lake/20140704_082906_7_bestshot.jpg
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: April 19, 2024 20:58:06
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: April 19, 2024 20:58:06