Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography
╳Discussions
💬 Home🔎 Search📅 LatestGroups
EducationOpen discussion area.Fakes & FraudsOpen discussion area.Field CollectingOpen discussion area.FossilsOpen discussion area.Gems and GemologyOpen discussion area.GeneralOpen discussion area.How to ContributeOpen discussion area.Identity HelpOpen discussion area.Improving Mindat.orgOpen discussion area.LocalitiesOpen discussion area.Lost and Stolen SpecimensOpen discussion area.MarketplaceOpen discussion area.MeteoritesOpen discussion area.Mindat ProductsOpen discussion area.Mineral ExchangesOpen discussion area.Mineral PhotographyOpen discussion area.Mineral ShowsOpen discussion area.Mineralogical ClassificationOpen discussion area.Mineralogy CourseOpen discussion area.MineralsOpen discussion area.Minerals and MuseumsOpen discussion area.PhotosOpen discussion area.Techniques for CollectorsOpen discussion area.The Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryOpen discussion area.UV MineralsOpen discussion area.Recent Images in Discussions
GeneralColoring agent in pink smithsonite from Choix
8th Mar 2009 02:05 UTCNH
Thanks
8th Mar 2009 04:41 UTCHoward Heitner
8th Mar 2009 07:34 UTCMark Heintzelman 🌟 Expert
google the report THE COLORS OF SMITHSONITE: A MICROCHEMICAL INVESTIGATION: Patricia L. Frisch and Virgil W. Lueth, New Mexico Bureau of Geology & Mineral Resources, Socorro, NM
8th Mar 2009 07:37 UTCRobert Meyer Manager
Thus, I would not assume it is cobalt at Choix that causes the pink color.
Bob
8th Mar 2009 07:52 UTCMark Heintzelman 🌟 Expert
MRH
8th Mar 2009 08:16 UTCNH
Mark: I looked up your source and found the abstract. The authors claim that Cu and Cd in solid solution are responsible for the pink (low Cu) and blue (higher Cu) colors, which is pretty surprising. They state that the Cd must be changing the way that the Cu colors the mineral; anyone have any guesses how?
8th Mar 2009 09:28 UTCKnut Eldjarn 🌟 Manager
I am no expert in the field but can try to give you the same explanation I used to give my chemistry students many years ago.The perceived colour of a material is a function of the composition of the light (wavelenghts) shining on or entering the material and the light (wavelenghts) reflected, absorbed or emitted by the material. How a material absorbs or reflects photons is a result of the interaction between the electrons orbiting the molecules and the wavelengths and energy in the light hitting the orbiting electrons. I doubt that anyone has studied the specific properties of the electrons orbiting the Smithsonite-molecules and thus any explanation would have to be a general one. Introducing atoms that influence the orbiting erlectrons could potentially change the colour of the object. Any atoms with "reactive" electrons - i.e. metals or halogenides would be expected to have a high potential to influence the orbiting electrons and maybe change the colour of a material. Inert gases and stable compunds would not be expected to have such effect. Cu and Cd have different properties related to their electronegativity and how their electrons react with other atoms and molecules. It is no wonder if by a coincidence in nature the presence of different amounts of these potential chromophores could have the effect on the colour of Smithsonites as descibed in the paper refered to in the thread. But even if the paper documents a correlation between the amounts of Cu and Cd and the colour changes, there may very well be unknown factors X and Y at work also.
Maybe this explanation does not answer your question, but at least it is a simplistic approach to understanding the mechanisms causing the great variety of colours in nature.
Knut
8th Mar 2009 20:48 UTCRobert Meyer Manager
Bob
9th Mar 2009 20:15 UTCHoward Heitner
So, there is no shortage of opinions. What seems to be lacking is data. The color of a transition metal ion in solution is caused by electronic transitions between unfilled d orbitals. These energy levels are affected by the oxidation state of the atom and what other atoms are around it (the ligand or crystal field). In a mineral, a transition metal impurity ion is essentially “dissolved” in the mineral crystal, substituting for one of the component elements of the mineral. To really prove that an impurity ion causes a particular color in a mineral, first it has to be shown that the ion is present and second that it is dispersed in the crystal structure and is in the right oxidation state. The first part is easy, the second part is not so easy. Any analytical method in which the mineral is completely dissolved is suspect, because any trace components found in the solution might be from inclusions and the oxidation state might change during sample preparation. There is a way around this problem however. If synthetic crystals of the mineral can be grown containing only one trace element, the absorption spectrum ( which is seen by the human eye as color) could be compared to the natural mineral. A good example of this is synthetic ruby, which is pure corundum doped with chromium. It has the same or similar color to the natural mineral. (and is sometimes sold as natural ruby by dishonest people).
So, now is the time for everyone to send in whatever data you have and how you reached your conclusions. Perhaps a prize should be offered for the first synthetic pink smithsonite crystal.
10th Mar 2009 07:11 UTCNH
This is the main reason that I'm confused by the role of Cd, if any, in producing colors: Cd2+ has all d orbitals filled (CdS has a low band gap and absorbs light by transitions between its valence and conduction bands). Correlation doesn't mean causation, and as Knut suggested there might be other factors at work here...
Synthetic smithsonite would certainly be interesting.
10th Mar 2009 14:03 UTCHoward Heitner
19th Feb 2012 01:44 UTCRalph S Bottrill 🌟 Manager
26th Feb 2012 06:57 UTCRalph S Bottrill 🌟 Manager
Any others?.
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: April 19, 2024 21:12:13
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: April 19, 2024 21:12:13