Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography
╳Discussions
💬 Home🔎 Search📅 LatestGroups
EducationOpen discussion area.Fakes & FraudsOpen discussion area.Field CollectingOpen discussion area.FossilsOpen discussion area.Gems and GemologyOpen discussion area.GeneralOpen discussion area.How to ContributeOpen discussion area.Identity HelpOpen discussion area.Improving Mindat.orgOpen discussion area.LocalitiesOpen discussion area.Lost and Stolen SpecimensOpen discussion area.MarketplaceOpen discussion area.MeteoritesOpen discussion area.Mindat ProductsOpen discussion area.Mineral ExchangesOpen discussion area.Mineral PhotographyOpen discussion area.Mineral ShowsOpen discussion area.Mineralogical ClassificationOpen discussion area.Mineralogy CourseOpen discussion area.MineralsOpen discussion area.Minerals and MuseumsOpen discussion area.PhotosOpen discussion area.Techniques for CollectorsOpen discussion area.The Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryOpen discussion area.UV MineralsOpen discussion area.Recent Images in Discussions
Improving Mindat.orgQuestionable Schirmerite photo
19th Jan 2011 14:43 UTCLefteris Rantos Expert
http://www.mindat.org/photo-283342.html
This photo shows an acicular sulphosalt, labeled as Schirmerite. The locality is not listed for Schirmerite and there is no mention if the sample is analyzed.
Although these sulphosalts are absolutely impossible to distinguish without analysis, a very similar specimen from the same locality has been analyzed as Sb-rich Gustavite http://rruff.info/R100203 . Please not that the analyzed specimen in the RRUFF website was also previously labeled as Schirmerite!! (see the "view label" link)
I think that at least a note should be added to the caption, stating that the sample is not analyzed and it's ID is questionable.
Lefteris
19th Jan 2011 18:33 UTCRob Woodside 🌟 Manager
19th Jan 2011 22:08 UTCMarko Burkhardt Expert
I will try to get more information. It was sold as "analyzed" Schirmerite, thats all I can tell at the moment.
Marko
6th Mar 2011 22:12 UTCMarko Burkhardt Expert
I got some new information today. This mineral is not really Schirmerite. The last analysis show that it is also not Sb-rich Gustavite. Some more analysis is done and will be done. Publication will come soon.
Marko
7th Mar 2011 16:01 UTCUwe Kolitsch Manager
22nd Oct 2011 15:26 UTCLefteris Rantos Expert
This might be the new species Terrywallaceite (IMA 2011-017). See http://rruff.info/terrywallaceite/display=default/
Lefteris.
22nd Oct 2011 20:08 UTCMarko Burkhardt Expert
When my sample was sold as Schirmerite, he sold some Sb-rich Gustavites at the same time. These Sb-rich Gustavites turned out to be the Terrywallaceite.
But I once got the information that there was some analysis about the "Schirmerite" running and it perhaps will also turn out to be a new mineral.
That's all I know at the moment.
Marko
22nd Oct 2011 21:36 UTCLefteris Rantos Expert
It's a very thin line between Sb-rich but Bi-dominant Gustavite (such as http://rruff.info/R100203 ), and Sb-dominant Terrywallaceite.
Schirmerite is also Bi-dominant, but has a thicker PbS sheet than Gustavite in the structure. A Sb-dominant phase would make a new species, I believe.
Lefteris.
23rd Oct 2011 17:52 UTCMarko Burkhardt Expert
My sample has exacty the same label. If there is no mix-up of the labels, it is probably Terrywallaceite. An analysis will be helpfull, I guess.
Marko
25th Oct 2011 23:42 UTCRichard Gunter Expert
These "Schirmerite" crystals from Peru do not look too much like the type locality Schirmerite. The Schirmerite crystals are tin-white laths in Quartz that have a coating of a fine-grained, black alteration product. The Colorado Schirmerite crystals do not contain any Sb but have variable Bi-Pb ratios. I do not know why but it may be due to short-range disequilibrium.
Richard Gunter
26th Oct 2011 10:24 UTCLefteris Rantos Expert
Just take a look at specimens of Gustavite, Cosalite and Krupkaite that have been positively identified by the RRUFF project ( http://rruff.info/ ): most of them were labeled as something different on their previous labels!
Indeed, type-locality Schirmerite from Colorado looks completely different from the Peruvian material. However this doesn't mean that Schirmerite can not occur in a habit similar to other species of the Gustavite-Lillianite series (free-standing bladed xls) at a different locality. I'm not saying that this makes the Peruvian material true Schirmerite, just that it doesn't exclude this possibility.
Also, the formula of Schirmerite could probably incorporate some Sb replacing Bi, as long as Bi remains dominant (someone more knowledgeable of the complex mineralogy of sulphosalts might correct me here, as incorporation of Sb could at some extent change the structure?). So we could not exclude the existence of a Sb-bearing Schirmerite, even if type-locality material is actually Sb-free. Also, variable Pb/Bi ratios could result in different species (or a mixture of species): As noted before, the difference between Schirmerite and Gustavite (and several other closely related species, for that purpose) is the thickness of a PbS sheet in the structure, i.e. the Pb/Bi ratio.
Marko - an analysis would certainly shed light to the situation here. Everything else is mere guess at this point...
Lefteris.
26th Oct 2011 16:06 UTCRichard Gunter Expert
Your point about the Lillianite Group being difficult to identify and many minerals specimens existing under "false flags" is well taken.
The chemical analyses by Dr. Karup-Moller in his 1977 investigation of type Schirmerite gave three discrete clusters of analyses on a Bi2S3-Ag2S-Pb2S2 triangular plot. They plotted along a constant Ag2S tie line.
Part of the problem with the mislabelling may be the age of some of the samples. Schirmerite was originally characterized by Dr. Genth and his paper on the description indicates he had great difficulty distinguishing Schirmerite as all the data available to him was wet chemistry.
The Treasury Mine is fairly simple in its sulphosalt mineralogy. The Ag-Bi veins are physically separate from the Galena-bearing Pb-Ag veins. Schirmerite only occurs in the Ag-Bi veins.
Richard Gunter
24th Jun 2012 21:36 UTCMarko Burkhardt Expert
Results:
Pb: 10,8%
S: 51,3%
Sb: 8%
Bi: 23,8%
Th: 6% (Th???)
(Could the Th peak being mistaken? Is it a Ag peak?)
Can anybody tell me what it might be?
Marko
24th Jun 2012 22:00 UTCRob Woodside 🌟 Manager
25th Jun 2012 17:41 UTCLefteris Rantos Expert
What we can also safely assume, is that your specimen is indeed strongly Bi-dominant, i.e. Schirmerite or Gustavite, and NOT Terrywallaceite or some other new Sb-dominant species.
Lefteris.
25th Jun 2012 18:49 UTCPeter Haas
Sb: 121.76 g/mol
Bi: 208.98 g/mol
Pb: 207.2 g/mol
Ag: 107.87 g/mol
S. 32.06 g/mol
Thus we get:
Bi : Sb : Pb : Ag : S = 0.114: 0.066 : 0.052 : 0.056 : 1.600
29th Jun 2012 17:11 UTCUwe Kolitsch Manager
3rd Jul 2012 13:03 UTCUwe Kolitsch Manager
Identification is impossible without XRD analysis or at least quant. EPMA.
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: March 28, 2024 22:05:27
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: March 28, 2024 22:05:27