Help mindat.org|Log In|Register|
Home PageMindat NewsThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusManagement TeamContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatSponsor a PageSponsored PagesTop Available PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on MindatThe Mindat Store
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryRandom MineralSearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
StatisticsThe ElementsMember ListBooks & MagazinesMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryHow to Link to MindatDevice Settings
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day Gallery
bannerbannerbannerbannerbannerbanner
avatar
Brent Thorne July 25, 2011 05:18PM
Mindat photos 227056 and 276855 are duplicate photos of the same specimen.
avatar
Knut Edvard Larsen July 26, 2011 08:41AM
Thanks. Fixed
avatar
Paul De Bondt July 26, 2011 09:21AM
Hi,

Here is another pair, pic 320404 and 349996.

Take care and best regards.

Paul.
avatar
Knut Edvard Larsen July 26, 2011 09:26AM
Paul,
320404: http://www.mindat.org/photo-320404.html and 349996 http://www.mindat.org/photo-349996.html are not alike.
avatar
Paul De Bondt July 26, 2011 09:41AM
Knut,

Oops must be 349966.
avatar
Uwe Kolitsch August 06, 2011 01:52PM
Fixed.
avatar
Paul De Bondt August 06, 2011 02:00PM
Thank you Uwe.

Paul.
avatar
Paul De Bondt February 24, 2012 08:05PM
Hi,

2 pics are the same.
http://www.mindat.org/photo-356171.html and http://www.mindat.org/photo-397250.html

Take care and best regards.

Paul
avatar
Jason Evans February 26, 2012 02:18AM
Duplicate Ilvaite pics

321096 and 340087
avatar
Knut Edvard Larsen March 01, 2012 06:16PM
Thank you, both Paul and Jason !.
All fixed.
avatar
Paul De Bondt March 01, 2012 06:26PM
Thanks Knut
avatar
Paul De Bondt March 10, 2012 04:54PM
Here are a few more.

Pic 17111 and 242613 are the same specimen.
Pic 185747 and 242620 also.
I hope this helps.

Take care and best regards.

Paul.
avatar
Knut Edvard Larsen March 10, 2012 07:26PM
Thanks again for catching these. Now fixed
avatar
Paul De Bondt March 13, 2012 07:07PM
Thanks Knut.

Here's another pair.

Pic 250122 and 275826 are the same and also 383427 and 446339.

Pic 396427 and 446339 could be considered as child photo's.

I hope this helps.

Take care and best regards.

Paul.
avatar
Jeff Krueger March 14, 2012 08:34PM
Pic 350368 and 350369 are the same specimen.

I hope this helps.
Jeff
avatar
Knut Edvard Larsen March 19, 2012 07:17PM
all fixed
avatar
Jeff Krueger April 10, 2012 04:29PM
Pic 310155, 246240 and 310153 are the same specimen. -Jeff
avatar
Knut Edvard Larsen April 15, 2012 06:58PM
All fixed now.
avatar
Jason Evans April 18, 2012 09:22PM
Not duplicates as such but they are just cropped images of the same specimen, and the photo which shows the specimen in whole has these images already as child photos
precious opal (var boulder opal) 415066 and 415064
avatar
Debbie Woolf April 26, 2012 04:08PM
Jason, I do not see what is wrong here, can you please elaborate.
avatar
Paul De Bondt May 02, 2012 10:34PM
Hi,

These 2 are the same pictures.

http://www.mindat.org/photo-339653.html and http://www.mindat.org/photo-386636.html

I hope this helps.

Take care and best regards.

Paul.
avatar
Paul De Bondt May 02, 2012 10:39PM
Hi,

These 2 pictures are the same.

http://www.mindat.org/photo-386637.html and http://www.mindat.org/photo-339654.html

I hope this helps.

Take care and best regards.

Paul.
avatar
Knut Edvard Larsen May 04, 2012 10:07AM
Thanks. Fixed
avatar
Paul De Bondt May 04, 2012 10:10AM
Thanks Knut.
avatar
Paul De Bondt May 08, 2012 09:31PM
Hi,

Thase 2 are the same also ;

http://www.mindat.org/photo-399394.html and http://www.mindat.org/photo-399395.html
They are not exactly the same but the difference is minor.

I hope this helps.

Take care and best regards.

Paul.
avatar
Debbie Woolf May 09, 2012 03:05AM
Hi Paul

It is a child to the parent, just slightly different but I think that is allowed.

M
avatar
Jason Evans May 10, 2012 05:37PM
Debbie my previous post was about a specimen which was the same specimen as another photo, just a slightly cropped version of it, i dont see why that should be added as a separate picture, considering the fact that the photo which shows the specimen in its entirety has the cropped image as a child photo, that just my opinion though. i just dont get what is the purpose of having a child photo and using that as a separate image. I have also noticed this with these photos 326333 326335 and 326334 all are the same specimen from a different angle and one of the photos has the other 2 individual photos as a child photos, is that really necessary?
avatar
Rob Woodside May 10, 2012 06:38PM
To Jason and all. It would help greatly if you would use the Tourmaline icon to post the photos of what you are talking about in the post itself. Giving the photo numbers is a help, but seeing them is much better and easier on us.

Jolyon and Dave say we have lots of room on the server, so duplication is as yet not a severe problem. Different photos of the same specimen are fine especially if they show different views. Duplicate photos and cropped duplicate photos seem of little use, unless one has additional things to say about them, but that is really what the talk pages are for.
avatar
Knut Edvard Larsen May 10, 2012 06:38PM
Jason,
About the http://www.mindat.org/photo-415063.html you're quite right that there was something. The problem was that the second photo was set as child of the first photo (parent), and the third photo was not set as child of the first photo, which is normal, but as child of the second photo. Thus there were 2 parents. It is now fixed.
avatar
Paul De Bondt September 05, 2012 07:54PM
Hi,

These pictures look alike : http://www.mindat.org/photo-428648.html and http://www.mindat.org/photo-426207.html

I hope this helps.

Take care and best regards.

Paul.
avatar
Debbie Woolf September 06, 2012 03:13PM
Hi Paul

Yes you are correct they are the same pictures, one from the seller & the other from the buyer I presume, providing permission has been given I don't think there is a problem, it's when it's a duplicate from the same member.

BW
Debbie
avatar
Paul De Bondt September 06, 2012 04:11PM
Hi Debbie,

Thank you for the reply.
Didn't notice it was from 2 different members. Sorry.
Still, I find it's silly to keep 2 same pictures in a gallery who count 4 pictures.
If you open the Shallow Water mine picture gallery, you will notice the "strange " effect.

Just my 2 cent.

KR.

Paul.
avatar
Debbie Woolf September 06, 2012 05:22PM
Yes I see what you mean!
avatar
Paul De Bondt February 06, 2013 04:26PM
Hi Debbie and all,

Didn't post since awhile.

These are the same picture :
http://www.mindat.org/photo-327615.html and http://www.mindat.org/photo-340150.html.

I hope this helps.

Take care and best regards.

Paul.
avatar
Debbie Woolf February 06, 2013 10:21PM
Hi Paul

Fixed those two.

Thanks!
Debbie
avatar
Paul De Bondt February 07, 2013 12:48PM
Hi Debbie,

Thanks.

On this page, there are also 3 " nearly " identical pictures : http://www.mindat.org/gallery.php?loc=1777&min=2665

I hope this helps.

Take care and best regards.

Paul.
avatar
Debbie Woolf February 21, 2013 06:35PM
Noted Paul thanks - I made them all childs of the parent by date of upload.
avatar
Paul De Bondt August 04, 2013 12:53PM
Hi,

These are the same pictures, except for the size :
http://www.mindat.org/photo-324115.html and http://www.mindat.org/photo-340130.html
I hope this helps.

Take care and best regards.

Paul.
avatar
Knut Edvard Larsen August 05, 2013 10:27AM
Thanks! Fixed.
avatar
Paul De Bondt August 06, 2013 03:16AM
Thanks Knut,

These 2 are also the same :
http://www.mindat.org/photo-360368.html and http://www.mindat.org/photo-272970.html and this is a child of these :
http://www.mindat.org/photo-272971.html

I hope this helps.

Take care and best regards.

Paul.
avatar
Paul De Bondt August 06, 2013 03:22AM
These are the same too :

http://www.mindat.org/photo-320290.html and http://www.mindat.org/photo-399402.html

KR.

Paul.
avatar
Knut Edvard Larsen August 06, 2013 09:15AM
Fixed (all in the 2 latest messages)



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/06/2013 09:19AM by Knut Edvard Larsen.
avatar
Paul De Bondt September 02, 2013 04:55PM
Thanks Knut,

These are the same too :http://www.mindat.org/photo-339540.html and http://www.mindat.org/photo-320373.html

I hope this helps.

Take care and best regards.

Paul.
Your Email:


Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically. If the code is hard to read, then just try to guess it right. If you enter the wrong code, a new image is created and you get another chance to enter it right.
CAPTCHA
Your message:
Attachments:
  • Valid attachments: jpg, jpeg, gif, png, pdf
  • No file can be larger than 9.38 MB
  • 3 more file(s) can be attached to this message



bannerbannerbannerbannerbannerbanner
Mineral and/or Locality  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2016, except where stated. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us Current server date and time: December 8, 2016 07:51:59
Go to top of page