Help mindat.org|Log In|Register|
Home PageMindat NewsThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusManagement TeamContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatSponsor a PageSponsored PagesTop Available PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on MindatThe Mindat Store
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryRandom MineralSearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportAdd Glossary Item
StatisticsMember ListBooks & MagazinesMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryHow to Link to MindatDevice Settings
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day Gallery
bannerbannerbannerbannerbannerbanner

Questionable gwindels

Posted by Harjo Neutkens  
avatar Questionable gwindels
September 13, 2011 09:30PM
    
Following a facebook discussion about gwindels I thought to have at the gwindels on Mindat.
There are a few of which I'm not sure if they are actually gwindels.
Please feel free to correct me (especially Amir smiling smiley

http://www.mindat.org/photo-306994.html http://www.mindat.org/photo-318581.html normal parallel growth
http://www.mindat.org/photo-196056.html not a combination of fadenquartz with a gwindel; fadenquartz only
http://www.mindat.org/photo-291286.html difficult to see, but I'm not sure there's a gwindel in the cluster
http://www.mindat.org/photo-228878.html not a combination of fadenquartz with a gwindel; fadenquartz only
http://www.mindat.org/photo-361654.html not sure, doesn't look twisted, so maybe normal parallel growth
http://www.mindat.org/photo-277949.html rehealed Quartz crystals
http://www.mindat.org/photo-168090.html "Gitterquarz" (oriented growth on Feldspar)
http://www.mindat.org/photo-410310.html very good gwindel disguise. But I think it's normal parallel growth (gwindel in pegmatite is unlikely)
http://www.mindat.org/photo-411346.html normal parallel growth
http://www.mindat.org/photo-410212.html I think normal parallel growth
http://www.mindat.org/photo-154848.html not sure....
http://www.mindat.org/photo-160004.html not sure, but I think normal parallel growth
http://www.mindat.org/photo-59101.html normal parallel growth
http://www.mindat.org/photo-396828.html normal parallel growth
http://www.mindat.org/photo-260443.html very good disguise, but I think it's not a gwindel (unlikely in a pegmatite).
http://www.mindat.org/photo-186172.html tiny one, I looked at it for hours under the microscope and I'm quite sure it's a gwindel, but not 100% sure

Cheers,

Harjo



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/13/2011 09:36PM by Harjo Neutkens.
Re: Questionable gwindels
September 14, 2011 02:02AM
1 & 2 likely not
3 faden (doesn't claim to be a gwindel)
4 bad shot (doesn't claim to be a gwindel)
5 just faden
6 no
7 likely not
8 gitterquartz, as written (doesn't claim to be a gwindel)
9 gwindel (I know because I saw a top view shot). In the discussion we heard that the poster was not sure about the exact locality (!?).
10 no
11 what is a "transitional gwindel"??? not sure
12 maybe, but not likely
13 unlikely (doesn't claim to be a gwindel)
14 unlikely, need a top view
15 unlikely
16 unlikely, need top view photo
17 we know that one winking smiley You should be able to tell, need top view photo

For 9, check description of locality http://www.mindat.org/loc-2534.html

A lot of people are confused by the fact that quartz with macromosaic structure is often somewhat twisted around the c-axis and this is often reflected in the intergrowth of neighboring crystals.
avatar Re: Questionable gwindels
September 14, 2011 08:21AM
    
Thanks for 9 winking smiley then the locality maybe should be changed. Likely not from pegmatites around Shengus, but from the alpine-type environment in the nearby area.

3 faden (doesn't claim to be a gwindel)
4 bad shot (doesn't claim to be a gwindel)

Last night it did... but the description has apparently been changed overnight. For 3 it said to be a combination of faden and gwindel, which it is not. And for 4 it said there was a small gwindel in front of the largest crystal, which I couldn't see, they changed gwindel into fadenquartz, but I actually can't see a fadenquartz either.....

8 gitterquartz, as written (doesn't claim to be a gwindel)

They also changed this one overnight. It used to say that they were either gwindels or twins.

Thanks for changing the descriptions Rob or Tim, I appreciate that. But whenever you think that my comments are questionable, feel free to contact me and argue with me. I'm quite often wrong winking smiley

what is a "transitional gwindel"???

Beats me, totally new concept to me winking smiley

Cheers,

Harjo



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 09/14/2011 08:28AM by Harjo Neutkens.
avatar Re: Questionable gwindels
September 14, 2011 05:15PM
    
Hi Harjo,

You're most welcome. And thank you for bring the questioned photos to my attention. :) Upon seeing the list you provided I went through and made the necessary corrections. For the 4th photo on the list I went back and added additional photos showing the smaller crystal that was thought to be a gwindel (in the close-ups), as well as another full-view photo taken from a different angle. It appears to show just normal parallel growth, but I just wanted to highlight the area of the specimen for those who might wish to see it in greater detail. Thanks again. I've learned much from re-examining the photos in the light of your comments. Unfortunately, true gwindels are specimens I have little experience with.

Best wishes,
Tim
Cohasset, MN, USA
avatar Re: Questionable gwindels
September 14, 2011 08:15PM
    
Well Tim, you're most welcome. And by providing the close-ups I can see a true gwindel on that specimen smiling smiley
Actually, the specimen seems to have more then one gwindel, I see at least two, maybe three typically gwindel-like twisted crystals. Nice specimen!
So that one will remain on the gwindel list.

Cheers,

Harjo



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/14/2011 08:35PM by Harjo Neutkens.
Re: Questionable gwindels
September 14, 2011 10:00PM
Harjo Neutkens Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well Tim, you're most welcome. And by providing
> the close-ups I can see a true gwindel on that
> specimen smiling smiley

Hmm, where?
avatar Re: Questionable gwindels
September 14, 2011 10:38PM
    
Well, I think this is a gwindel.



Quite sure.

And maybe here's one too.



Not 100% sure though.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/14/2011 10:39PM by Harjo Neutkens.
Attachments:
open | download - gwindel1.jpg (121.7 KB)
open | download - gwindel.jpg (95.1 KB)
avatar Re: Questionable gwindels
September 14, 2011 11:32PM
    
Hi Harjo,

I'm glad to have been able to help. :) I may be wrong, but I think the crystal you pointed to with a red arrow on the second full-specimen shot may be the same crystal as in the close-ups. But it does seem to be a gwindel.

Best wishes,
Tim
Cohasset, Minnesota, USA
Re: Questionable gwindels
September 14, 2011 11:44PM
There is a characteristic and "diagnostic feature" seen in many gwindels:
the edge between the prism faces is more twisted than the gwindel itself.
One can only see that in a top view.
If the edge is perfectly parallel to the other edges, one should double and triple check the specimen before making a claim.

The attached photo shows a top view of a clockwise twisted gwindel.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/14/2011 11:45PM by Amir C. Akhavan.
Attachments:
open | download - gwindel_faces_2_scl.jpg (284.1 KB)
avatar Re: Questionable gwindels
September 16, 2011 04:57AM
    
Hello Amir,

Thank you for the excellent photos. They clearly illustrate the diagnostic twisting of the gwindel. :)

Best wishes,
Tim Blackwood
Cohasset, Minnesota, USA
avatar Re: Questionable gwindels
September 16, 2011 08:09AM
    
Tim, here are more interesting drawings and photos of gwindels: Amir's quartz-page: http://www.quartzpage.de/gwindel.html
avatar Re: Questionable gwindels
September 16, 2011 09:56AM
    
Hi Harjo,

Thank you very much for the link. It is most interesting. :)

Best wishes,
Tim
Cohasset, Minnesota, USA
falk burger
Re: Questionable gwindels
October 16, 2011 03:52AM
Hi,
happened to come across your chat as I was researching the likely nature of this crystal from Brazil. I see a lot of quartz and this is unique to my experience. What do you think?

Falk
Attachments:
open | download - IMG_0387.jpg (105.4 KB)
avatar Re: Questionable gwindels
October 17, 2011 01:58AM
What features of the crystal do you find unique?

Rock Currier
Crystals not pistols.
falk burger
Re: Questionable gwindels
October 18, 2011 06:01PM
rock currier,
I was looking for a knowledgeable opinion, preferably from Harjo as he seems to know his subject. If you can't see what's unique about this crystal, I'm not hopeful your opinion will add to my understanding.
falk
Re: Questionable gwindels
October 18, 2011 06:56PM
@Falk Burger
This is an open forum, and everybody is invited to ask questions, show photos and also reply to questions, as long as one follows netiquette rules.

If you seek advice of a particular person, and don't want to hear opinions of others, you should contact that person via P.M. or email.

If you ask a question in a forum, it is perfectly o.k. for others to ask for clarification, as Rock has done, because it is meant to help finding the correct answer and to avoid misunderstandings.

I would advise to explain what you find unique about the crystal.
avatar Re: Questionable gwindels
October 18, 2011 08:04PM
    
Rock is way more knowledgeable than I am!
Rock asked you what you think is unique about the Quartz, so do I. I'd have to see a better picture of it.
Apart from that, I think your reaction on Rocks reply was not polite.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 10/18/2011 08:56PM by Harjo Neutkens.
falk burger
Re: Questionable gwindels
October 30, 2011 08:43PM
So the redoubtable Harjo Neutkens AND the truly stupefying Amir Akhavan (whose quartz info pages are enlightening and contributed much to my understanding - my sincere thanks) can't see what's so unusual about the crystal? Seems to me you're either not as knowledgeable as I thought or adopting a disingenuous posture of false humility in order to police my forthrightness which you find impolite. Duly noted. Your defense of the hapless rock currier is noble and must preempt anything so fatuous as the exchange of pertinent info. Please forgive the sarcasm but seriously? None of you can see the twistal in that crystal? I'm going to stick with calling a spade what it is - if etiquette is your paramount value, where are you? The violence you do to free discourse -and to me- is far greater than the simple slight with which I invited rock currier to have another look. In a discussion of "questionable gwindels" - really!
avatar Re: Questionable gwindels
October 30, 2011 09:42PM
    
First; Amir immediately recognized the twist, and we talked about it. I also see something that looks like a twist, albeit not like in a gwindel.
Second, Rock is far, far more knowledgeable than I am, really!
Third, I think we got of on a wrong start here. So let's bury the hatchet (if there ever was one winking smiley and talk about the crystal, because we are genuinely interested.
If you post a couple more detail photos we can discuss the crystal further. To judge what it is I really need more photos, in order to rule out the possibility that it is a rehealed crystal.

Cheers,

Harjo
falk burger
Re: Questionable gwindels
October 31, 2011 05:40PM
Thanks, Harjo, you're a gent.
my attitude is, it's not about us, it's all about the crystals. We're just here to be awed by them - I'm sure Rock saw the twist, he was prolly just feeling chatty and I was not. Depending on the time of day, I can get a bit cranky about how much time I spend at the computer when I have rocks to polish - Tucson is always closer than I think. Here are two more pictures, I failed to attach the others but will do so at your request, also special angles or closeups if you like. One sometimes sees very faint C-axis twist in prismatic habit crystals, but this one stands out with a dramatic twist on all six prism faces and good continuity from termination to term. Of course I have high hopes this might be one of the very rare C-axis gwindels, but I'm not holding my breath.

Best,

Falk
Attachments:
open | download - IMG_0386.jpg (30.7 KB)
open | download - IMG_0385.jpg (31.1 KB)
Author:

Subject:


Attachments:
  • Valid attachments: jpg, jpeg, gif, png, pdf
  • No file can be larger than 1000 KB
  • 3 more file(s) can be attached to this message

Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically. If the code is hard to read, then just try to guess it right. If you enter the wrong code, a new image is created and you get another chance to enter it right.
CAPTCHA
Message:


bannerbannerbannerbannerbannerbanner
Mineral and/or Locality  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2015, except where stated. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us Current server date and time: September 4, 2015 17:41:03