|
|
|
Large (?) meteorite April 18, 2010 06:17PM |
Registered: 3 years ago Posts: 32 |
I've found a (comparitively) large (+/-5 lb meteorite) in my back yard (western Nevada) and am wondering if it has value. It is
1. roughly 128mm wide x 137mm tall x 76mm thick;
2. has distinct, scalloped regmaglypts on the main face and other faces to some extent;
3. has a smooth, almost shiny metallic black patina/ crust all over it with some very slight rust (oxidation) showing;
4. is magnetic and affects a compass passed around it;
5. is quite heavy/dense for its size (not porous at all).
I'm pretty sure it is not from this property as the previous owner was quite the rockhound.
Do I get lab tests run and what kind? Thin slices? I have no idea what to do with this thing but, by all the stuff I've seen for sale, it is VERY unique indeed.
1. roughly 128mm wide x 137mm tall x 76mm thick;
2. has distinct, scalloped regmaglypts on the main face and other faces to some extent;
3. has a smooth, almost shiny metallic black patina/ crust all over it with some very slight rust (oxidation) showing;
4. is magnetic and affects a compass passed around it;
5. is quite heavy/dense for its size (not porous at all).
I'm pretty sure it is not from this property as the previous owner was quite the rockhound.
Do I get lab tests run and what kind? Thin slices? I have no idea what to do with this thing but, by all the stuff I've seen for sale, it is VERY unique indeed.
|
Re: Large (?) meteorite April 18, 2010 07:26PM |
|
Registered: 6 years ago Posts: 524 |
picture plus there are forums dedicated to meteorites [www.meteoritesusa.com]
who may be of more assistance
who may be of more assistance
|
|
Re: Large (?) meteorite April 18, 2010 08:03PM |
|
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 8,364 |
Firstly, very unique? as opposed to just slightly unique? :)
Ok. 99.9% of things people think are meteorites end up being something very terrestrial. You really need to get it examined by someone to identify it properly. Absolutely no point discussing value until that's done.
No, it's not going to help much sending a photo. Take it to a museum.
Jolyon
Ok. 99.9% of things people think are meteorites end up being something very terrestrial. You really need to get it examined by someone to identify it properly. Absolutely no point discussing value until that's done.
No, it's not going to help much sending a photo. Take it to a museum.
Jolyon
|
Re: Large (?) meteorite April 19, 2010 01:49AM |
Registered: 3 years ago Posts: 32 |
Well...it's bigger than your average grapefruit, weighs 6-1/4 lbs, has marks in it like somebody dragged their fingers through wet clay so it's kinda special around this house. heh heh heh... Thanks for the help tho. Have some feelers out already for some testing and expert help on the matter.
Tex
Tex
|
Re: Large (?) meteorite April 24, 2010 09:21PM |
Registered: 3 years ago Posts: 4 |
|
|
Re: Large (?) meteorite April 25, 2010 03:52AM |
|
Registered: 3 years ago Posts: 676 |
|
|
Re: Large (?) meteorite April 26, 2010 06:18AM |
|
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 2,046 |
the 99,99% of " I think its a meteorite " I have control in at 12 years I work on meteorites its result hematite, marcasite, slags, limonite etc... only in 2 case its confirmed the meteorite origin
Mindat Page
[www.mindat.org]
Attrezzatura e tecnica sono solo l'inizio. È il fotografo che conta più di tutto. (John Hedgecoe)
Mindat Page
[www.mindat.org]
Attrezzatura e tecnica sono solo l'inizio. È il fotografo che conta più di tutto. (John Hedgecoe)
|
Re: Large (?) meteorite June 29, 2010 08:05PM |
Registered: 2 years ago Posts: 7 |
|
|
Re: Large (?) meteorite June 29, 2010 08:07PM |
|
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 2,046 |
for me its a fusion slag
Mindat Page
[www.mindat.org]
Attrezzatura e tecnica sono solo l'inizio. È il fotografo che conta più di tutto. (John Hedgecoe)
Mindat Page
[www.mindat.org]
Attrezzatura e tecnica sono solo l'inizio. È il fotografo che conta più di tutto. (John Hedgecoe)
|
Re: Large (?) meteorite June 30, 2010 02:18PM |
|
Registered: 7 years ago Posts: 10,998 |
|
|
Re: Large (?) meteorite June 30, 2010 03:47PM |
|
Registered: 3 years ago Posts: 33 |
Hi Tex
you wrote
is magnetic and affects a compass passed around it
That to me that indicates magnetite. So to find out for sure do a streak test. Just take a piece of white unglazed porcelain and scratch the piece on it. It should give you a very diagnostic colored streak. It will be steel gray if it is magnetite. If you don't have a piece of porcelain just use the back side of your toilet bowl lid. If yours is not white then go to your local hardware store and buy a cheap white bathroom/kitchen tile.
For best results you might try to streak a "fresh" interior piece. Because one of the mineralogical components of fusion crust is magnetite.
Let us know the results.
Mike Jensen
Colorado USA
you wrote
is magnetic and affects a compass passed around it
That to me that indicates magnetite. So to find out for sure do a streak test. Just take a piece of white unglazed porcelain and scratch the piece on it. It should give you a very diagnostic colored streak. It will be steel gray if it is magnetite. If you don't have a piece of porcelain just use the back side of your toilet bowl lid. If yours is not white then go to your local hardware store and buy a cheap white bathroom/kitchen tile.
For best results you might try to streak a "fresh" interior piece. Because one of the mineralogical components of fusion crust is magnetite.
Let us know the results.
Mike Jensen
Colorado USA
|
|
Re: Large (?) meteorite February 10, 2011 07:51PM |
|
Registered: 6 years ago Posts: 583 |
I'm no meteorite expert but I have a small collection and the picture does not resemble a meteorite to me, the regmaglypts you mentioned dont look like the regmaglypts ive seen on other photos of meteorites, and the ones on my sikhote alin, also i see what looks like some kind of vesicle, like a popped bubble, i dont think these are seen in meteorites, but are certtainy visible in pieces of slag, there can be lots of types of slag, some are glassy and some are metallic so that would explain the magnetism.
When i was younger i used to find lots of this weird shaped heavy metallic stuff and was convinced it was meteorites, the fact that where i live was built around the railway industry and i always used to find it near the railworks sort of slipped my attention, i was young and excited about my "meteorites" but soon discovered it was just slag!
I say i am not an expert but i do know a little bit more than the average person who doesnt collect meteorites, I was able to confidently id a meteor"wrong" for a freind of a freind, he was conviced he had a meteorite and i took one look at it and told him its a pyrite (or marcasite) nodule, they are found in chalk in my area, i didnt mention that at first and waited to see what he said, he was still convinced he had a meteorite so i said, i bet you found this in chalk didnt you and he said "uh yeah, how did you know?" I told him if he broke it open he would see rays of greenish brassy pyrite radiating out from the centre, i dont know if he did that but he certianly quit insisting it was a meteorite after i said that.
not that I took any enjoyment in telling him he doesnt have a meteorite, i know from my slag experience what ist liek to be disapointed when you find out you dont have what you think you have!, but he wanted to know, and I wasnt going to lie about it just to make him happy!
When i was younger i used to find lots of this weird shaped heavy metallic stuff and was convinced it was meteorites, the fact that where i live was built around the railway industry and i always used to find it near the railworks sort of slipped my attention, i was young and excited about my "meteorites" but soon discovered it was just slag!
I say i am not an expert but i do know a little bit more than the average person who doesnt collect meteorites, I was able to confidently id a meteor"wrong" for a freind of a freind, he was conviced he had a meteorite and i took one look at it and told him its a pyrite (or marcasite) nodule, they are found in chalk in my area, i didnt mention that at first and waited to see what he said, he was still convinced he had a meteorite so i said, i bet you found this in chalk didnt you and he said "uh yeah, how did you know?" I told him if he broke it open he would see rays of greenish brassy pyrite radiating out from the centre, i dont know if he did that but he certianly quit insisting it was a meteorite after i said that.
not that I took any enjoyment in telling him he doesnt have a meteorite, i know from my slag experience what ist liek to be disapointed when you find out you dont have what you think you have!, but he wanted to know, and I wasnt going to lie about it just to make him happy!
Copyright © Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau 1993-2013. Site Map.
Locality, mineral & photograph data are the copyright of the individuals who submitted them. Site hosted & developed by Jolyon Ralph.
Mindat.org is an online information resource dedicated to providing free mineralogical information to all. Mindat relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Mindat does not offer minerals for sale. If you would like to add information to improve the quality of our database, then click here
to register.
Current server date and time: 18th May 2013 20:57:16
Current server date and time: 18th May 2013 20:57:16
Mindat Lightbox
Options| Fade toolbar when not in focus | Fix toolbar to bottom of page | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hide Social Media Links | |||
| Slideshow frame delay | seconds | ||
Locality Updated: Giuminella Creek, Narzole, Cuneo Province, Piedmont, ItalyFrom Flavio Giuseppe Taricco, 18th May 2013 20:02:11



















