Iron Cap Prospects, Kasaan Peninsula, Prince of Wales Island, Ketchikan Mining District, Prince of Wales-Hyder Census Area, Alaska, USAi
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Latitude & Longitude (WGS84):
55° 38' 56'' North , 132° 23' 27'' West
Latitude & Longitude (decimal):
Type:
Group of Prospects
KΓΆppen climate type:
Nearest Settlements:
Place | Population | Distance |
---|---|---|
Thorne Bay | 483 (2017) | 9.3km |
Hollis | 112 (2011) | 18.5km |
Coffman Cove | 180 (2017) | 48.9km |
Hydaburg | 391 (2017) | 56.3km |
Mindat Locality ID:
198155
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:2:198155:4
GUID (UUID V4):
5426c99e-fd28-4827-aa2d-bad70d818fb8
Location: The center of the area that contains the Iron Cap prospects is about 0.4 mile northwest of the top of Tolstoi Mountain and about 0.5 mile south of the center of section 4, T. 72 S., R. 85. The workings and geology of the Iron Cap and nearby prospects are shown on plate 17 of Warner and others (1961).
Geology: The rocks in the vicinity of the Iron Cap prospects consist mainly of greenstone and clastic sedimentary rocks interlayered with limestone. The area is cut by a multitude of closely spaced, northeast-trending, nearly vertical dikes of diorite, granodiorite, diabase, basalt, and andesite. There is a major fault southwest of the prospects that can be traced for at least three miles. About 1,500 feet to the northeast, there is a contact with a large granodiorite body that postdates the dikes. The geology of the area and the location of the workings are shown in detail by Warner and others (1961, plate 17). The deposit crops out in an area of about 1,000 by 2,000 feet, but most of the mineralization is confined to an area of about 150 by 200 feet delineated by numerous trenches. The mineralization consists of pods and lenses as much as 200 feet long and 20 to 30 feet thick of magnetite with subordinate pyrite and chalcopyrite. A few of the lenses consist largely of pyrite, pyrrhotite, and chalcopyrite, with subordinate magnetite. The ore bodies preferentially replace what was probably calcareous shale or sandstone (as distinct from the greenstone) and are roughly conformable to the layering. The ore bodies are associated with tactite composed of diopside, andradite garnet, hornblende, epidote, and blue-green chlorite, and are cut by late veinlets of quartz and calcite. The Iron Cap prospect was explored around 1900 by an adit about 100 feet long, by numerous pits and trenches, and, in 1901, by several hundred feet of drilling (Brooks, 1902). During WW II, the U.S. Bureau of Mines drilled the deposit, collected numerous samples, and carried out a dip needle survey (Erickson, 1948). The dip-needle survey suggested that the ore bodies are shallow and do not extend outside the area of the known magnetite lenses. However, the American Copper and Nickel Company recently commissioned an aerial geophysical [aeromagnetic?] survey that located several strong anomalies in the area (Anzman, 1998; Hedderly-Smith, 1999 [Inventory]). The work by the Bureau of Mines defined about 90,000 metric tons of reserves with 40 percent iron, 0.25 percent copper, and trace gold and silver (Erickson, 1948; Warner and others, 1961; Maas and others, 1995). The Iron Cap prospect is one of many copper-iron deposits on the Kasaan Peninsula having similar geology and origin (Warner and others, 1961; Eberlein and others, 1983; Brew, 1996). The rocks on the peninsula consist mainly of andesite ('greenstone' in much of the older literature) interbedded with about 25 percent sedimentary rocks comprising approximately equal amounts of limestone or marble, calcareous mudstone and sandstone, and graywacke and conglomerate. These units are part of the Luck Creek Breccia of Silurian and Devonian age, but many of the sedimentary units are similar to and probably grade into rocks of the Silurian and Ordovician, Descon Formation. The bedded rocks are intruded by a profusion of Silurian or Ordovician dikes, sills, and irregular masses of porphyritic gabbro, basalt, andesite, diorite, dacite, and granodiorite. Near some of the deposits, these intrusions may make up 20 percent or more of the outcrop and usually are associated with the development of tactite and alteration of the greenstone. The area subsequently was intruded by several large Silurian or Ordovician plutons; they are mainly granodiorite but locally are diorite and gabbro. The ore deposits are typically small and of irregular shape; often the ore bodies form lenses or mantos. Some of the deposits conform to the layering in the greenstone and sedimentary rocks. The principal ore minerals are chalcopyrite, pyrite, and magnetite; hematite is often present and a little molybdenite occurs in some deposits. Most of the deposits are associated with tactite or skarn with varying amounts of actinolite, calcite, chlorite, garnet, diopside, epidote, and hornblende. There was significant by-product silver and gold in the ore that was mined in the past, and the gold values in some deposits are high enough to have encouraged exploration in recent years. Marble is more common in the deposits in the western part of the peninsula, where the gold values are generally higher as well (Wright and Wright, 1908; Wright, 1915; Warner and others, 1961; Myers, 1985; Bond, 1993; Maas and others, 1995). Early interpretations of the ore deposits on the Kasaan Peninsula emphasize their contact metamorphic origin and their probable Mesozoic age (for example, Warner and others, 1961). However, recent radiometric dating and mapping indicate that the deposits formed in a Silurian or Ordovician, arc-related environment characterized by deposition of andesite and submarine sedimentary rocks that were intruded by swarms of dikes of varying composition, mineralized, and then intruded by large granodiorite plutons (Hedderly-Smith, 1999 [Inventory]). The copper deposits of the Kasaan Peninsula were known to the Russians and the first claim was staked in 1867. Most of the production and development occurred from about 1900 to 1918, especially from 1905 to 1907, when copper prices soared and a smelter was built at Hadley on the north side of the Kasaan Peninsula. After World War I, copper supply exceeded demand, prices fell, and there has been no further copper production since 1918 (Wright, 1915; Warner and others, 1961; Roppel, 1991; Maas and others, 1995). However, because of the intense and widespread mineralization on the peninsula, the area has repeatedly been re-examined for copper, iron, and gold, notably during WW II (Warner and others, 1961) and in the last several decades.
Workings: The Iron Cap prospect was explored around 1900 by an adit about 100 feet long, by numerous pits and trenches, and, in 1901, by several hundred feet of drilling (Brooks, 1902). During WW II, the U.S. Bureau of Mines drilled the deposit, collected numerous samples, and carried out a dip needle survey (Erickson, 1948). The dip-needle survey suggested that the ore bodies are shallow and do not extend outside the area of the known magnetite lenses. However, the American Copper and Nickel Company recently commissioned an aerial geophysical [aeromagnetic?] survey that located several strong anomalies in the area (Anzman, 1998; Hedderly-Smith, 1999 [Inventory]).
Age: The deposit formed in a Silurian or Ordovician, submarine arc-related environment characterized by the deposition of volcanic and sedimentary rocks, the intrusion of swarms of dikes of diverse composition, and the emplacement of several large plutons.
Alteration: Development of calc-silicate skarn.
Reserves: The work by the Bureau of Mines defined about 90,000 metric tons of reserves with 40 percent iron, 0.25 percent copper, and trace gold and silver (Erickson, 1948; Warner and others, 1961; Maas and others, 1995).
Commodities (Major) - Cu, Fe; (Minor) - Ag, Au
Development Status: Undetermined.
Deposit Model: Cu-Fe skarn (Cox and Singer, 1986; model 18d).
Select Mineral List Type
Standard Detailed Gallery Strunz Chemical ElementsCommodity List
This is a list of exploitable or exploited mineral commodities recorded at this locality.Mineral List
8 valid minerals.
Detailed Mineral List:
β Calcite Formula: CaCO3 |
β Chalcopyrite Formula: CuFeS2 |
β 'Chlorite Group' |
β Diopside Formula: CaMgSi2O6 |
β Epidote Formula: (CaCa)(AlAlFe3+)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH) |
β 'Garnet Group' Formula: X3Z2(SiO4)3 |
β 'Hornblende Root Name Group' Formula: ◻Ca2(Z2+4Z3+)(AlSi7O22)(OH,F,Cl)2 |
β Magnetite Formula: Fe2+Fe3+2O4 |
β Pyrite Formula: FeS2 |
β Pyrrhotite Formula: Fe1-xS |
β Quartz Formula: SiO2 |
Gallery:
List of minerals arranged by Strunz 10th Edition classification
Group 2 - Sulphides and Sulfosalts | |||
---|---|---|---|
β | Chalcopyrite | 2.CB.10a | CuFeS2 |
β | Pyrrhotite | 2.CC.10 | Fe1-xS |
β | Pyrite | 2.EB.05a | FeS2 |
Group 4 - Oxides and Hydroxides | |||
β | Magnetite | 4.BB.05 | Fe2+Fe3+2O4 |
β | Quartz | 4.DA.05 | SiO2 |
Group 5 - Nitrates and Carbonates | |||
β | Calcite | 5.AB.05 | CaCO3 |
Group 9 - Silicates | |||
β | Epidote | 9.BG.05a | (CaCa)(AlAlFe3+)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH) |
β | Diopside | 9.DA.15 | CaMgSi2O6 |
Unclassified | |||
β | 'Chlorite Group' | - | |
β | 'Hornblende Root Name Group' | - | β»Ca2(Z2+4Z3+)(AlSi7O22)(OH,F,Cl)2 |
β | 'Garnet Group' | - | X3Z2(SiO4)3 |
List of minerals for each chemical element
H | Hydrogen | |
---|---|---|
H | β Epidote | (CaCa)(AlAlFe3+)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH) |
H | β Hornblende Root Name Group | ◻Ca2(Z42+Z3+)(AlSi7O22)(OH,F,Cl)2 |
C | Carbon | |
C | β Calcite | CaCO3 |
O | Oxygen | |
O | β Calcite | CaCO3 |
O | β Diopside | CaMgSi2O6 |
O | β Epidote | (CaCa)(AlAlFe3+)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH) |
O | β Magnetite | Fe2+Fe23+O4 |
O | β Quartz | SiO2 |
O | β Hornblende Root Name Group | ◻Ca2(Z42+Z3+)(AlSi7O22)(OH,F,Cl)2 |
O | β Garnet Group | X3Z2(SiO4)3 |
F | Fluorine | |
F | β Hornblende Root Name Group | ◻Ca2(Z42+Z3+)(AlSi7O22)(OH,F,Cl)2 |
Mg | Magnesium | |
Mg | β Diopside | CaMgSi2O6 |
Al | Aluminium | |
Al | β Epidote | (CaCa)(AlAlFe3+)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH) |
Al | β Hornblende Root Name Group | ◻Ca2(Z42+Z3+)(AlSi7O22)(OH,F,Cl)2 |
Si | Silicon | |
Si | β Diopside | CaMgSi2O6 |
Si | β Epidote | (CaCa)(AlAlFe3+)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH) |
Si | β Quartz | SiO2 |
Si | β Hornblende Root Name Group | ◻Ca2(Z42+Z3+)(AlSi7O22)(OH,F,Cl)2 |
Si | β Garnet Group | X3Z2(SiO4)3 |
S | Sulfur | |
S | β Chalcopyrite | CuFeS2 |
S | β Pyrite | FeS2 |
S | β Pyrrhotite | Fe1-xS |
Cl | Chlorine | |
Cl | β Hornblende Root Name Group | ◻Ca2(Z42+Z3+)(AlSi7O22)(OH,F,Cl)2 |
Ca | Calcium | |
Ca | β Calcite | CaCO3 |
Ca | β Diopside | CaMgSi2O6 |
Ca | β Epidote | (CaCa)(AlAlFe3+)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH) |
Ca | β Hornblende Root Name Group | ◻Ca2(Z42+Z3+)(AlSi7O22)(OH,F,Cl)2 |
Fe | Iron | |
Fe | β Chalcopyrite | CuFeS2 |
Fe | β Epidote | (CaCa)(AlAlFe3+)O[Si2O7][SiO4](OH) |
Fe | β Magnetite | Fe2+Fe23+O4 |
Fe | β Pyrite | FeS2 |
Fe | β Pyrrhotite | Fe1-xS |
Cu | Copper | |
Cu | β Chalcopyrite | CuFeS2 |
Other Databases
Link to USGS - Alaska: | CR066 |
---|
Other Regions, Features and Areas containing this locality
North America PlateTectonic Plate
- Alexander DomainDomain
This page contains all mineral locality references listed on mindat.org. This does not claim to be a complete list. If you know of more minerals from this site, please register so you can add to our database. This locality information is for reference purposes only. You should never attempt to
visit any sites listed in mindat.org without first ensuring that you have the permission of the land and/or mineral rights holders
for access and that you are aware of all safety precautions necessary.