Help mindat.org|Log In|Register|
Home PageMindat NewsThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusManagement TeamContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatSponsor a PageSponsored PagesTop Available PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on MindatThe Mindat Store
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryRandom MineralSearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportAdd Glossary Item
StatisticsMember ListBooks & MagazinesMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryHow to Link to MindatDevice Settings
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day Gallery
bannerbannerbannerbannerbannerbanner

Mindat mineral database: some questions

Posted by Reynaldo Contreira  
avatar Mindat mineral database: some questions
February 28, 2012 02:36AM
Dear all,

Could you please help a poor mineral collector to understand some status shown in the mindat database?
I compared some of them with the IMA/CNMNC list of mineral names (2009) or follow the new messages at IMA status forum and I got a little confused.

Minerals shown as Grandfathered:
ANORTHOCLASE: should not be considered as “intermediate member”?
SCHIRMERITE: was not discredited (IMA/CNMNC list of mineral names from 2009)?
MAGNESIOASTROPHYLLITE: should not be considered as “published without approval”?

Minerals shown as approved:
HYDROXYLBASTNÄSITE-(Ce): should not be considered as “published without approval” like -(La)?
NATROKOMAROVITE: should not be considered as “published without approval”?
VEATCHITE-A: should not be considered as polymorph of VEATCHITE?
FLUORSTROPHITE: ?
SODIC-FERRI-CLINOFERROHOLMQUISTITE: ?
IVANYUKITE-Na-T and IVANYUKITE-Na-C are not polymorphs of IVANYUKITE-Na?

Other cases:
FERRIC-NYBÖITE and FERRIC-FERRONIBÖITE: what are the status?
FERRIPEDRIZITE was discredited?
UVITE, “Hydroxyuvite”, IMA 2000-030: very confusing for me
Synonyms for GITTINSITE: IMA 1979-034 seems to be ok, but not IMA 1970-034 (refers to TAKANELITE ?)
SARRABUSITE should not be included in the database?

Thanks,
Reynaldo
Author:

Your Email:


Subject:


Attachments:
  • Valid attachments: jpg, gif, png, pdf
  • No file can be larger than 1000 KB
  • 3 more file(s) can be attached to this message

Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically. If the code is hard to read, then just try to guess it right. If you enter the wrong code, a new image is created and you get another chance to enter it right.
CAPTCHA
Message:


bannerbannerbannerbannerbannerbanner
Mineral and/or Locality  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2015, except where stated. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us Current server date and time: March 30, 2015 17:14:59