Mindat Logo
bannerbannerbannerbanner
Welcome!

POTD discussion

Posted by Jeff Weissman  
avatar POTD discussion
February 29, 2012 09:05PM
Would be nice to have a talk page for each POTD, with a quick note from the person who selected a particular image for POTD, as to what feature of the image was attractive to them. For example, "interesting morphology". "seldom seen in this habit", "great example of this rare mineral", "great view of a collecting site", etc... I think this would enhance our appreciation of the POTD and of the selection process.
avatar Re: POTD discussion
February 29, 2012 10:34PM
Jeff, doesn't a computer select POTD? Insert winking smiley here. Lol
avatar Re: POTD discussion
February 29, 2012 10:53PM
    
No. We have a monkey for that. They also do quite well in picking stocks and bonds.

This settled, all the failed jokes aside, I can go on to answer Jeff's question.
Jeff, feel free to open a topic on the POTD choices, actually, you already have. The message board is an open and liberal place where things can be discussed at all times.
So, whenever a POTD that I chose is being questioned, I have no problem explaining why it was my choice, and I know this counts for all the other managers as well.
I do hope however, and I think they are most of the time, the reasons for choosing a certain photo as POTD are obvious.

Cheers,

Harjo
avatar Re: POTD discussion
February 29, 2012 11:23PM
Harjo (and Mindat monkey winking smiley )

I find that the majority of POTDs are obviously interesting and worthy of the selection. Some are a bit more obtuse as to why they were selected.

Having a selector's comment may help both the initiated and novice to better understand and appreciate the particular attributes of the POTD - think of this as an educational opportunity and a means to communicate with the future. For example, the recent selection of benitoite from Japan - rare species collectors, including myself, will marvel at the excellent crystal, etc., while someone not so familiar with rare or Japanese minerals, whom might otherwise shrug their shoulders at such as image, will be informed as to the images interesting features, and our future archivist will have some information to help document / interpret the range of mineral related images the have been posted.

As a reviewer of posted POTD images, I could post comments, but I will not want to guess at why some of the images were selected, although it is more obvious for others. I could post a comment, "great image of a rare transparent benitoite" while the selection may have been made based on "great photo showing skills of photographer to capture a small crystal"



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/01/2012 04:54AM by Jeff Weissman.
avatar Re: POTD discussion
March 01, 2012 01:04AM
    
I like this idea for the educational benefits we can learn. Take me for instance, my knowledge is limited to Southern African minerals, no Benitoite there so I've just learnt something new !
Re: POTD discussion
March 01, 2012 03:43AM
Well, Debbie, you should run around the Kalahari manganese fields at night with a shortwave UV light, and you may well find some unobtrusive overlooked benitoite! It just takes a little Ba and Ti (both are present there) and a wee bit of metamorphism. The Japanese have recently found benitoite lurking, long-unnoticed, at a couple of metamorphosed Mn deposits smiling smiley
avatar Re: POTD discussion
March 01, 2012 06:11AM
    
is a question I do for a long time, since some POTD are really poor and do not understand why they are chosen

Mindat Page

[www.mindat.org]


Attrezzatura e tecnica sono solo l'inizio. È il fotografo che conta più di tutto. (John Hedgecoe)
avatar Re: POTD discussion
March 01, 2012 07:07AM
    
Jeff, thats a great idea! Besides the photographic quality (which can be one but only one possibility of the choice), there are so many others. Unique habits (like Haralds pyrite recently!), unique paragenesis, thrilling aesthetics, historic specimen, rareness, ..., I could go on and on.
We are not always experts to realize the reason of the choice but would love to learn more about it. Not in any critical way, just for educational reasons!
avatar Re: POTD discussion
March 01, 2012 10:48AM
I have asked that when a photo is selected as possible POTD for managers to edit and extend the description of the photo where necessary to include the information about what the photo is trying to show (and therefore why it is important).

Having a better description for the photo is more useful in the long-term than a separate description written somewhere about why it was chosen as POTD.

Editors must remember they have every right to go and edit photo descriptions and add extra comments if necessary.

Jolyon
avatar Re: POTD discussion
March 01, 2012 08:29PM
    
Jeff, I'll tell you what I look for in a POTD of my choice. I very much like aesthetic and well executed photos, of nice specimens (I won't add that to the description, though, it would look a bit awkward, but I occasionally add my favourite micro photos to a topic here on the photography board)
When it's a POTD of something very rare and ugly, it was probably Alfredo's choice winking smiley
avatar Re: POTD discussion
March 01, 2012 08:41PM
    
Then it's Alfredo we have to bribe, Jeff! winking smiley
Re: POTD discussion
March 01, 2012 09:04PM
LOL, Peter smiling smiley

Actually, I confess I very rarely pay attention to the POTD, and I think I've only selected maybe fewer than 10 total in the last several years? In fact many days often go by without me even seeing the POTD, because when I go to Mindat it's below the bottom of my screen and I'm usually immediately moving on to a locality or species page without scrolling further down the front page.

In my humble opinion, the POTD issue has been inflated way out of proportion to its importance to the site, as if choosing POTDs were Mindat's most serious function, and getting one selected were the highest accolade for any Mindat user/contributor. I enjoy looking at them when I happen to see them, and I'm very grateful to all our many contributors who take the time to upload photos of interesting and/or beautiful minerals and localities, but publicising POTDs is far from Mindat's primary purpose confused smiley

Cheers smileys with beer
Alfredo
avatar Re: POTD discussion
March 01, 2012 09:19PM
    
I completely agree Alfredo.
Re: POTD discussion
March 01, 2012 09:30PM
    
I also fully agree with Alfredo! ... and the POTD is fine as it is ... sometimes causes some "noise" but it is funny smileys with beer
avatar Re: POTD discussion
March 01, 2012 10:22PM
I'm with Alfredo. I scroll down to take a quick glance at the photo, but I rarely ever click on it to read the description. I believe the selection process is good the way it as I have never had an issue with the photo chosen, even though I've only had one in six years. Some might question the quality of the photo or why it was picked in the first place. To those folks I would say that there is more to the POTD than how well you can use your camera equipment! What about the scientific aspect to the photo, whether it is a specimen or a locality of significance??

No sense in re-inventing the wheel if it rolls just fine..... grinning smiley



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/01/2012 10:29PM by Paul Brandes.
avatar Re: POTD discussion
March 02, 2012 12:51AM
I'm not arguing with the selection process or quality aspects of POTD; its more a curiosity thing - what attracts someone to an image that others may have overlooked?


BTW, Alfredo, I've got plenty of ugly rocks to send your way next time you pass through New Haven grinning smiley
Re: POTD discussion
March 02, 2012 01:04AM
Todays POTD is not rare or aesthetic or a particularly good photo but it gave me a smile! Well chosen!! smiling smiley)
avatar Re: POTD discussion
March 02, 2012 05:38AM
    
Jolyon Ralph Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I have asked that when a photo is selected as
> possible POTD for managers to edit and extend the
> description of the photo where necessary to
> include the information about what the photo is
> trying to show (and therefore why it is
> important).
>
> Having a better description for the photo is more
> useful in the long-term than a separate
> description written somewhere about why it was
> chosen as POTD.
>
> Editors must remember they have every right to go
> and edit photo descriptions and add extra comments
> if necessary.
>
> Jolyon


type the POTD of today without any measure? For not to mention the other.....

Mindat Page

[www.mindat.org]


Attrezzatura e tecnica sono solo l'inizio. È il fotografo che conta più di tutto. (John Hedgecoe)
avatar Re: POTD discussion
March 02, 2012 09:30AM
    
But its happy!
avatar Re: POTD discussion
March 02, 2012 09:57AM
Happy Agate needs no explanation
Author:

Your Email:


Subject:


Attachments:
  • Valid attachments: jpg, gif, png, pdf
  • No file can be larger than 1000 KB
  • 3 more file(s) can be attached to this message

Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically. If the code is hard to read, then just try to guess it right. If you enter the wrong code, a new image is created and you get another chance to enter it right.
CAPTCHA
Message:
Mineral and/or Locality  
Search Google  
Copyright © Jolyon Ralph and Ida Chau 1993-2014. Site Map. Locality, mineral & photograph data are the copyright of the individuals who submitted them. Site hosted & developed by Jolyon Ralph. Mindat.org is an online information resource dedicated to providing free mineralogical information to all. Mindat relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Mindat does not offer minerals for sale. If you would like to add information to improve the quality of our database, then click here to register.
Current server date and time: October 26, 2014 04:26:15
Mineral and Locality Search
Mineral:
and/or Locality:
Options
Fade toolbar when not in focusFix toolbar to bottom of page
Hide Social Media Links
Slideshow frame delay seconds