The Most Common Minerals on the EarthLast Updated: 21st Sep 2017
By Jolyon & Katya Ralph
There are currently nearly 5000 minerals known to science, but only a few dozen are common enough to be found widespread throughout the Earth's crust. This article will explain a little bit about some of the most common minerals on the Earth and where the come from.
Inside the Earth
When we talk about the minerals found on the Earth we are talking about those that are found in the Earth's crust, the only part of the Earth really open for us to explore. The crust is a thin layer (up to 100km thick) under which lies the mantle and the upper (liquid) and lower (solid) core.
All minerals are made up of a mixture of the 90 naturally occurring elements, and it comes as no surprise that the most common minerals are those that contain the most abundant elements in the Earth's crust.
Table 1. Abundance of elements in the crust
Let's look at some of the most abundant minerals on Earth. Note that the photographs we show are often of exceptionally good crystals and not the form that average specimens of the minerals would appear to be - most rock-forming minerals are simply interlocking grains of a few mm maximum size, these photos show the potential of what these minerals can look like in the rare cases where conditions allow them to grow bigger and more perfect crystals.
The most common mineral in the crust is feldspar according to most references, with up to 52% of the crust being made up of feldspar. But feldspar is actually a group name for several related minerals - so we'll look a little at a couple of examples:
Na(AlSi3O8) - Ca(Al2Si2O8)
Plagioclase is a term for the sodium and calcium-rich feldspar minerals. Anorthite is a calcium-rich feldspar. The sodium-rich feldspar is albite. Many feldspars are of a composition between the two containing both sodium and calcium. These all together make up 39% of the Earth's crust.
Orthoclase and microcline are the two most common minerals classified as K-feldspar. These contain potassium. 12% of the Earth's crust is made up of these K-feldspars.
Quartz is an extremely common mineral (12% of the Earth's crust) because it is simply silicon and oxygen - the two most common elements in the crust. Quartz is hard and more resistant to chemical weathering than many other minerals, so it is a major constituent of sedimentary rocks derived from the erosion of older rock.
The pyroxene group are a related group of minerals sharing the same structure - parallel chains of silica tetrahedra. Common pyroxene group minerals are augite, enstatite, hedenbergite, ferrosilite and diopside. Between them the pyroxene group make up 11% of the Earth's crust.
The mica group of sheet silicates make up another 5% of the crust. There are many different minerals within the mica group, common mica minerals are phlogopite, muscovite and biotite (although the latter is a group name for several dark mica minerals). The silica tetrahedra form parallel sheets, and mica minerals are all hydrous (contain water).
The amphibole group also make up 5% of the crust, these, like the pyroxenes, are chain silicates (inosilicates), but unlike the pyroxene group these contain a double chain of silica tetrahedra. The amphibole group (known as a 'supergroup' on mindat because of its complexity) contains a large number of slightly different but structurally similar minerals.
Clay minerals make up 5% (mostly in as ultra-fine particles in sedimentary rocks). After this we have 3% for every other silicate mineral, and only 8% for non-silicates (including carbonates such as calcite and dolomite, oxides such as magnetite and sulfides such as pyrite and pyrrhotite.
Below the crust
The mantle is around 2,900km thick, or about 46% of the Earth's radius, but represents 87% of the total volume of the Earth.
Although the mantle is only 5km below the surface at the crust's thinnest point the challenges in drilling through the crust to reach the mantle are immense (not least because the crust is only this thin in the deepest parts of the ocean.)
But we can deduce a lot about the minerals that make up the mantle from examining fragments of these mantle rocks that are brought up from very deep by volcanoes and from the careful study of seismic data which allows us to understand some of the structure of rocks buried beneath the crust. Computer models can also predict the temperature, pressure and chemistry at various depths in the Earth and from this we can deduce the types of minerals likely to be present.
Here are some of the other major minerals that are thought to make up the mantle:
Fe2+2SiO4 - Mg2SiO4
We know that olivine is present in considerable amounts in the mantle as many fragments of rock containing olivine are brought up in lavas from deep-seated volcanoes. As with many of the silicate minerals, olivine is actually a group consisting of minerals such as forsterite and fayalite.
Hardness:7½ - 8
Plagioclase feldspar is the primary aluminous mineral found in the upper mantle above 30km, but between 30 and 60km this is substituted for spinel.
Below 60km, the aluminous phase in the mantle is pyrope, a member of the garnet group of minerals.
But the most common mineral in the earth as a whole is a high-pressure form of olivine called bridgmanite - formed with a distinct structure and not found at all in the Earth's crust. It's formed below 660km deep in the mantle so is found too deep to be transported back up to the surface in volcanic activity. However, samples of this mineral have been found in meteorites.
We know less about the core than any other part of the Earth not just because it is so remote but because the immense temperature/pressure found there are almost impossible to reproduce in laboratory experiments. We do know that the core is made up primarily of iron and nickel but also containing heavy elements such as gold and platinum in much greater concentrations than the crust. The outer core is liquid, but the inner core is solid. We can't ever take samples of the iron-nickel alloy from the inner core but we do believe the composition to be quite similar to that found in some metallic meteorites.
Hardness:5 - 5½
Taenite is the mineral name given to a mixture (alloy) of iron and nickel found in meteorites and some terrestrial rocks. It is quite likely that the core consists of material at a similar composition, but because of the incredible pressure and temperature it is likely to be in a different crystallographic form than taenite. Some scientists have proposed that because of the immense pressure the core may even be a single huge crystal of iron-nickel.
Klein, C., Hurlbut, C. S. (1993): Manual of Mineralogy, 21st Edition. John Wiley & Sons.
Tschauner, O. et al. (2014): Discovery of bridgmanite, the most abundant mineral in Earth, in a shocked meteorite. Science, 346, 1100-1102. doi: 10.1126/science.1259369.
Stixrude, L. and Cohen, R.E. (1995): Constraints on the crystalline structure of the inner core: Mechanical instability of BCC iron at high pressure. Geophysical Research Letters, 22, 125-128.
Article has been viewed at least 30086 times.
David Von Bargen
21st Jun 2015 4:24pm
Jolyon & Katya Ralph
21st Jun 2015 4:29pm
David Von Bargen
22nd Jun 2015 7:04am
The "Most Common Minerals on the Earth" article is terrific. Just adding an aside (since your theme is rather about the crust and also about common minerals, not rare):
Regarding modeling what is going on in the mantle and core in the last two sections, the diamond anvil cell (DAC) allows real-time observation by providing a window through which to observe the specimens while under test - that is the beauty of it. You can read more about the DAC on Dr. William A. Bassett's webpage, see link to the 2009 paper "Diamond Anvil Cell, 50th Birthday" in High Pressure Research 29, 163-186. He is one of the pioneers of diamond anvil cell high pressure research: http://www.geo.cornell.edu/eas/PeoplePlaces/Faculty/wab7/
Also, see our co-researcher's page, Dr. Steven D. Jacobsen: http://www.earth.northwestern.edu/research/jacobsen/
In Steve's photo, you see the view we see through the top diamond while under test, in this case a blue crystal of hydrous ringwoodite:
And to add to the list, perhaps "Josephinite: Specimens from the earth's core?" by our friends Jack Bird and Maura Weathers: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0012821X75900734
and "Widmanstaetten patterns in josephinite, a metal-bearing terrestrial rock" by Bird, Weathers and Bassett.http://www.researchgate.net/publication/6019159_Widmanstaetten_patterns_in_josephinite_a_metal-bearing_terrestrial_rock
Don't forget too, those messengers from the deep, inclusions: "The Microworld of Diamonds: Images from Earth's Mantle" Koivula and Skalwold, Rocks & Minerals magazine, 2014http://www.rocksandminerals.org/Back%20Issues/2014/January-February%202014/microworld-abstract.html
Very best wishes as always,
22nd Jun 2015 1:40pm
The article looks great! I have a new wide screen monitor and the text seem to be more readable. The use of PBOX saves a lot of time showing photos and it looks like you are able to write text in the BOX above the photos. When you get a chance can you show us what the code looks like to accomplish that?
Are the new features available to all of us? Also, I have some articles under construction. Can they be completed using the old format?
22nd Jun 2015 2:27pm
Here is the code, it's quite simple:
<minbox name=galena>Galena, Lead Sulfide, is the most common ore of Lead. You can write whatever you want here and even include other tags such as <m>cerussite</m>.</minbox>
This renders as:
Galena, Lead Sulfide, is the most common ore of Lead. You can write whatever you want here and even include other tags such as cerussite.
Note the photos chosen are the head photos for Galena.
Jolyon & Katya Ralph
22nd Jun 2015 6:11pm
From what you have shown me I think that I can figure it out.
22nd Jun 2015 6:43pm
Jolyon & Katya Ralph
22nd Jun 2015 10:15pm
23rd Jun 2015 2:11pm
I would add that pyroxene is believed to be one of the major constituents of the mantle also. The volume of the mantle, even the upper mantle alone, is much greater than that of the crust, and it therefore must contain far more pyroxene than the crust. Don’t take the pyroxene discussion out of “Crust,” but maybe just mention it again for “Below the Crust.”
The discussion of bridgmanite is cutting edge, but should be regarded as somewhat tentativie at this time. The information for bridgmanite isolated from that meteorite from Australia is certainly valid. But some workers have provided evidence also for a hydrous magnesian silicate at ultra-high pressure (MgSiH2O4), referred to as “phase H,” that may be stable in the lower mantle. So, I suggest qualifying the discussion to emphasize that it is still early in the scientific process, dealing with hypotheses that have changed markedly over the years. (Statement in Mindat: “This mineral is believed to compose up to 93% of the lower mantle above around 2700km and therefore is probably the most abundant mineral in the Earth.”) I might say: “This mineral is believed by many researchers to compose up to 93% of the lower mantle above around 2700km and, if so, might be the most abundant mineral in the Earth.”
14th Dec 2015 7:05pm
14th Dec 2015 7:42pm
10th Mar 2016 5:07am
Older textbooks probably refer to plagioclase being broken down into six species, including bytownite, labradorite, andesine and oligoclase. All of those are now regarded by mineralogists as varieties of either albite or anorthite.
This is why it is actually very important that both minerals and groups are used in a table like this, because a simple nomenclature change within the feldspar group suddenly changes six less-important minerals into two much more important minerals.
When looking just at species you are missing the bigger, and more important, picture about the distribution of minerals in the crust if you DON'T group these together as the group.
Ditto with pyroxenes and amphiboles. If you break these down into the individual species most species become unimportant, significantly underestimating the real importance of this group in the crust.
So what matters is this. Are you trying to teach something that actually tries to explain the makeup of the crust, or are you simply trying to assign scores to individual mineral species with no actual relevance to the real world?
Jolyon & Katya Ralph
21st Sep 2017 11:03pm
In order to leave comments to this article, you must be registered