Log InRegister
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for Educators
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
StatisticsThe ElementsUsersBooks & MagazinesMineral MuseumsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice Settings
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day Gallery

Objective measurements

Last Updated: 22nd Feb 2016

By Stephan Wolfsried

In my last article I found the Sony Nex 7 to be most appropriate camera in my setup with a bellows and microscope objectives.
Now I wanted to figure out which objectives cover best the range from 1 mm to appr. 20 mm FOV in terms of resolution and working distance to obtain best stacking results. For that purpose I bought a special target from Carl Zeiss which is capable to measure the resolution of objectives up to 3000 line pairs per mm. It is not a bargain, CZ Göttingen sells it for about 1500 €, but I think it is worth while, because there is no other way getting resolution measurement immideately.

Carl Zeiss Target 3000, FOV is 22 mm


An exemplary crop of a measurement is shown here:

Resolution of a Mitutoyo M Plan Apo 20x


This is the proof of the capability of my setup to come into the specified resolution areas of the objectives, which means that the overall stiffness and increments of the linear actor are sufficient.

With that Carl Zeiss target I measured my whole set of Luminars with and without tubus lens and as well my infinite objectives, most of them are Mitutoyos. The result is shown in the following table:

objective measurements


The really interesting figure is the amount of line pairs related to the FOV. This term represents the information density of a macro photo. Here is the graph containing this special value from the above table:

objective resolution graph


In a nutshell I found out, that only four different objectives cover the range from 1 mm FOV to 22 mm FOV with a reasonable value of 1500 to 3000 line pairs per FOV. The Luminars 25 mm and 40 mm are not bad in resolution, but they have not the appropriate working distance for good stacking results. The Seiwa Plan Apo 2,5 begins with vignetting at FOV around 10mm. Therefore the Luminar 63 mm seems to be the best choice for FOVs greater than 8 mm.




Article has been viewed at least 7288 times.

Comments

In order to leave comments to this article, you must be registered
Mineral and/or Locality  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2018, except where stated. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us Current server date and time: April 26, 2018 14:25:17
View slideshow - Go to top of page