Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

PhotosRhodochrosite - Lavrion District Mines, Lavreotiki, East Attica, Attica, Greece

20th May 2019 17:46 UTCClosed Account 🌟

Copyright © * Unknown User *
Although there is a lengthy explanation why this piece is supposed to be from the Lavrion Mining District I personally believe that this specimen is definitively NOT from there.


Cheers,


Branko

20th May 2019 18:45 UTCKevin Conroy Manager

It reminds me of some that I've seen from Cavnic, Romania.

20th May 2019 22:31 UTCEmil Box

Or Cassandra mines, Chalkidiki.

Milo

21st May 2019 19:04 UTCUwe Kolitsch Manager

Totally agree with Branko. Deleted.


For the record - the wishful-thinking (I am polite here) comment in the caption read:


"(...)

Obtained from Chris Spiromitros who feels strongly that the Lavrion locality is correct - Wolfgang Wendel and others who have been consulted are said to be in agreement. The crystal habit and color and associates are quite consistent with Cavnic, Romania. However, the overall habit of the aragonite is very suggestive of a Greek origin and Chris feels confident is not from Cassandra mines. After pursuing the research for over a year Chris believes that Anmeones area, Lavrion is the likely locality. I have subsequently heard from Fernando Metelli, the Italian collector who has an identical specimen attributed to Lavrion. He is the source of Chris' specimen. He obtained it from an Italian collector in Turin from a beneficiary who was liquidating it. It belonged to his mother and father, a mineral collecting team. He spent much time in Lavrion, she is Italian. His specimen has the same label and he is comfortable with the locality."

"

22nd May 2019 04:52 UTCFrank K. Mazdab 🌟 Manager

why was the photo deleted rather than just relegated to the user's personal gallery? There must be hundreds (edit: thousands?) of photos here that are either incorrectly IDed, attributed to an incorrect locality, or are otherwise simply terrible. But are such photos typically deleted?

22nd May 2019 13:25 UTCUwe Kolitsch Manager

There are no strict rules. I prefer to delete grossly erroneous photos.

In any case, all deleted photos are still in the database and can be retrieved.

22nd May 2019 19:28 UTCFrank K. Mazdab 🌟 Manager

Well, OK, but the ID was presumably correct and even the locality, while disputed here, seemed to have been supported by at least a couple of people according to its caption. So I'm not sure I'd call that "grossly erroneous". It's not as if the uploader labeled it "diamond - the Moon".


I only bring this up because while in this case that one photo was just one from among multi-thousands of photos uploaded by this user, and so one deleted questioned photo might not be missed, it could have just as easily been something uploaded for personal posterity from a small-time collector who might wonder (quite fairly, I might add) why simply because of a questioned locality, their photo was not only demoted from the public gallery (yes to that... no questioned IDs or localities should be in the public galleries) but in fact deleted altogether. Maybe we do need more defined rules for this?

22nd May 2019 19:57 UTCUwe Kolitsch Manager

> So I'm not sure I'd call that "grossly erroneous".


Well, we (Branko and me) consider ourselves Lavrion specialists (Branko has worked on the mineralogy of the Lavrion mines for decades, based on hundreds of underground collecting trips; and he wrote a PhD thesis on the deposit) and we can guarantee you that these people are simply wrong. No local Greek collectors have any such specimens in their collections.

I agree that the ID was probably correct.


The uploader allowed us managers to do anything (correction, deletion) with the uploaded photos, i.e. no notification or message necessary.


In my general opinion we should in general be more strict and many more photos should be deleted (after discussions and especially if the user cannot provide any convincing evidence for either ID or locality attribution).
 
Mineral and/or Locality  
Mindat Discussions Facebook Logo Instagram Logo Discord Logo
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: April 16, 2024 10:29:26
Go to top of page