Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

PhotosPumpung Lukaas mine, Cempaka diamond fields, Riam Kanan, South Kalimantan Province, Kalimantan, Indonesia

4th Jul 2019 09:07 UTCUwe Kolitsch Manager

01412650016028487289230.jpg
Jason Utas suggested that these are tectites (indochinites).

I thought it would be pieces of the limonite-rich, water-worn gravel hosting the diamonds (note: photo wasn't made by me).


Any opinions?

4th Jul 2019 10:06 UTCJolyon Ralph Founder

Look more like tectites than limonite to me. I wonder if the title is incorrect and these are just tectites offered for sale

4th Jul 2019 11:53 UTCKeith Compton 🌟 Manager

An article: van Leeuwan, T.M. (2014) The enigmatic Sundaland diamonds. Proceedings of Sundaland Resources 2014 MGEI Annual Convention Conference Paper, discusses the diamonds from Cempaka.


One paragraph states: "The Kalimantan diamonds are commonly found together with a mineral suite that includes corundum, diaspore, zircon, chromite/spinel, pleonaste, rutile, and rare tektite (Ubaghs, 1941)"


The Ubaghs reference is: Ubaghs, J.C.H. 1941. Diamonds in Borneo. Report held in Perpustakan Direktorat Geologi, No F 41-2 (Translated from Dutch).


So perhaps they are tektites


Cheers

4th Jul 2019 14:43 UTCUwe Kolitsch Manager

Thanks, Keith - very interesting.

5th Jul 2019 07:07 UTCUwe Kolitsch Manager

My colleague and meteorite/tectite specialist, Ludovic Ferrière, thinks the two on the right side are tectites, but he is not sure about the piece on the left.

12th Jul 2019 00:25 UTCJason Utas

The specimen on the left is also a tektite. The large ~flat face with the single pit in it is an old break that exposed a bubble and has since been partly re-etched by groundwater. Faint flow-banding / schlieren are visible on the left side of the flat surface.


I looked around on Google for a similar tektite; this piece of Darwin glass is somewhat similar, although Darwin glass is generally much more vesicular than indochinites, excluding the Muong Nong layered tektites...

12th Jul 2019 11:21 UTCUwe Kolitsch Manager

Ok, caption fixed.
 
Mineral and/or Locality  
Mindat Discussions Facebook Logo Instagram Logo Discord Logo
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: April 18, 2024 14:25:15
Go to top of page