Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Mineral Photographybegging opinion

27th Nov 2011 21:10 UTCDermot Walsh

on photo quality..thank you in advance

dermot

27th Nov 2011 21:54 UTCAmir C. Akhavan Expert

Hi Dermot,


"photo quality" means a lot, but suppose you want to upload the image to Mindat, hmm...


Correct me if I got something wrong.


You use a 12 MP P&S camera made in 2010, which gives one an idea of what to expect in terms of sharpness, noise and colors. The camera can only do autofocus and produces jpeg images.


The photo looks as if the specimen was placed under normal light bulbs. The whitebalance is not quite right, it is still too yellow.

I guess it was a hand held shot, and because you do not want it "motion blurred" under the low light you have increased the ISO setting so much that the image gets noisy.

The original shot (in full resolution) must actually be very noisy, because even downscaled to the actual size it is still well visible.


The most disturbing part for me is the background, though. Not only is a background like the one in the photo not really visually pleasing and distracts from the specimen, it also interferes with the color of the mineral.



So if I got the "hand held shot" right, I'd suggest 2 things:

1. get a tripod, there are small ones (20 - 30 cm) that can be put on a table

2. use low ISO, but longer exposure (perhaps the camera will try to know better than you)

3. get a neutral background, white, gray, black and any dark color will hardly interfere with the color if the mineral

4. do a proper whitebalance (also easier with a white/gray background)


You've asked for it ;)

27th Nov 2011 22:04 UTCAmir C. Akhavan Expert

I can actually tell you more:

ISO 800 (way too high for a camera like that)

Exposure Time 1/40, set automatically (doesn't matter on a tripod)

F 3.1 (might be too low, insufficient depth of field)

White Balance: Day White Fluorescent, set manually


I'd try ISO 100 or lower, higher F, different white balance

27th Nov 2011 22:10 UTCDermot Walsh

hi Amir thank you for your time and opinion..i am hoping too learn more

best wishes

dermot

27th Nov 2011 22:32 UTCAdam Berluti

04321810016053528862822.jpg
I made this 24X17 inch box and used a drawer for the glass. I put the camera on a tripod and place the camera looking down on the mineral specimen. I dont put the camera level with the specimen becuase you can see the back edge of the glass. I do not use lights just the cameras flash. What I dislike about the glass is it gets scratched very easily. If you can use your flash on your camera the front of the specimen wouldn't be in the dark and the light would not be reflecting off the background.

29th Nov 2011 23:00 UTCDermot Walsh

may i ask if a mineral id..may be possible from either of these photos..?.

the colour is off..

thanks in advance

30th Nov 2011 01:28 UTCReiner Mielke Expert

Pyrite encrusted fluorite?

30th Nov 2011 23:47 UTCDermot Walsh

thank you Reiner..best wishes

1st Dec 2011 01:41 UTCFamous Zia uddin

its great information...

8th Jan 2012 22:56 UTCJenna Mast

I'll add some additional poor man's advice.


If you have limited control over the white balance on the camera, you can usually get the levels you need by using a DayGlo incandescent bulb which you can buy at the market or drug store. They aren't the ideal color temperature but they're better than ordinary incandescent bulbs.


If you can't get the exposure quite right, try placing the specimen on a neutral colored or two toned background (such as black and white). This forced the camera to choose a moderate value.


Photoshop. If it's more affordable to you than a better camera and set up, it's rather good at correcting for the short comings of cheap cameras and wrong color temperature lighting.
 
Mineral and/or Locality  
Mindat Discussions Facebook Logo Instagram Logo Discord Logo
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: April 18, 2024 00:51:51
Go to top of page