Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Improving Mindat.orgabundance of a mineral and crystals size range

24th Nov 2011 02:18 UTCcascaillou

I don't know if that could be done practically, but it would be interesting to know what is roughly the size range that can be expected for the crystals of a given specy.

I mean like 'mostly sub-millimetric', 'usually millimetric', 'unfrequently centimetric, or 'often centimetric' (based on previously reported finds).

To answer this question I usually check the photo gallery, but for some lesser-known minerals the photographic content is too thin to judge of what would have been found around the world.


Another interesting feature would be mentionning the relative abundance of the mineral.

I mean like 'very abundant', 'abundant', 'locally abundant', 'frequent', 'rather rare', 'rare', 'very rare'

Abundance is not only a matter of worldwide occurences, but also a matter how concentrated the mineral is in these regions.



I'm mainly suggesting these two features because when you search mindat, there are just too many minerals, and I often find myself wondering how 'significant' is a given mineral that I had never heard about before, and I guess I'm not the only one feeling a bit lost.

24th Nov 2011 14:58 UTCDavid Von Bargen Manager

If you click on the "i" icon in front of a mineral (ion the list for a locality), you will bring up a detail record for the mineral at the locality. It has information on the following:

5 Methods

6 Crystal habits

7 Colours

8 Fluorescence

9 Quality for species at this locality

10 Rarity at site

11 Comments

12 Reference


Size tends to be incorporated in "Habits"

Unfortunately less than 1% of the entries have any of this information filled in.

24th Nov 2011 15:43 UTCReiner Mielke Expert

Generally you can get a pretty good idea of the abundance or rarity by looking at the number of occurrences in the world as noted on Mindat. However that does not always translate directly to availability which adds another dimension to the meaning of the words abundant or rare.

24th Nov 2011 17:07 UTCcascaillou

sure, but market availability is a different story.

24th Nov 2011 20:17 UTCReiner Mielke Expert

Market availability is beyond the capability of any database like Mindat. Availability fluctuates and thus there will always be some data that is out of date. As such, any information would likely be misleading ( and could be manipulated) which could result in some angry people. There is really not much upside to Mindat attempting such a task that I can see. Of course Jolyon may have a different opinion.

24th Nov 2011 21:13 UTCcascaillou

agreed, market avaibility is irrelevant here and would be meaningless mineralogically speaking.


I'm only suggesting a mention of natural abundance of a given mineral, and crystals size range for a given mineral.


For instance, quartz: 'very abundant', crystals 'often centimetric'.


That would be enough to allow a mineral collector to get a good idea of what he can expect from a given mineral.


I would add that this could also facilitate the use of the mindat search engine by allowing one to eliminate irrelevant minerals from a search.

25th Nov 2011 03:50 UTCAlfredo Petrov Manager

Any database built by volunteers is only going to contain the information that the volunteers found interesting enough to add. As David pointed out, less than 1% of contributions made use of the functionality we already have to add some (vague) information on rarity and quality at a given site.


You can get some hints by seeing how many photos have been added for any given mineral at a site. With close to a half million photos on Mindat, growing rapidly, the selection is slowly acquiring some statistical significance. A mineral on a locality list NOT depicted on any photo would seem to indicate that is is either uninteresting or not readily available (with millions of exceptions to be sure ;)

25th Nov 2011 11:25 UTCDavid Von Bargen Manager

"I'm only suggesting a mention of natural abundance of a given mineral, and crystals size range for a given mineral.


For instance, quartz: 'very abundant', crystals 'often centimetric'.


That would be enough to allow a mineral collector to get a good idea of what he can expect from a given mineral."


That is sort of what the "Best Minerals" does.

25th Nov 2011 12:49 UTCReiner Mielke Expert

Another problem with this sort of information is that rarity or abundance often varies depending on where mining is taking place and sometimes even who is looking at the rocks. I've been to places where I found lots of say mineral X but most people find nothing, is it rare? Not to me. Also while mining is taking place in a certain area ( say the oxidized zone) a particular mineral may be common and then when mining progresses to a different area never be seen again, and rarely is anyone in a position to do a quantitative mineralogical assessment of a particular deposit. As for crystal size, that also changes as new occurrences are discovered and not everyone contributes to Mindat so the information will always be incomplete.

25th Nov 2011 13:34 UTCJolyon Ralph Founder

I think such a system is going to end up with more frustration ("But, it said 1cm crystals were common at this site, and I can't find any more than 5mm!") than benefits.

26th Nov 2011 03:03 UTCcascaillou






well I was thinking global worldwide, not local.


when I said quartz 'very abundant' crystals 'often centimetric', that was thinking worldwide. This is what a mineral collector can expect from quartz in a general way.


I actually own a mineralogy book that gives that kind of global estimate for each mineral, which I find useful.

26th Nov 2011 14:51 UTCRock Currier Expert

El,

What is the book you have that gives such estimates? Do you know the Handbook of Mineralogy that has for each mineral listed the maximum crystal size known? We try and incorporate these and in some rare instances larger sizes when they are known in the introduction of each mineral in the Best Minerals articles. It would be nice to incorporate in this section a global estimate of its abundance.

26th Nov 2011 15:02 UTCDavid Von Bargen Manager

Probably Stefan Weiss - Das grosse Lapis Mineralienverzeichnis.

26th Nov 2011 16:32 UTCErik Vercammen Expert

In the book mentioned by David, you find indicated with each mineral:

for the dimensions 4 possibilities:

only microscopic

fine-grained or microcristals

crystals smaller than 3 mm

crystals larger than 3 mm


for the abundance:

common

known from a number of localities and there sometimes rather abundant, but all together rather limited

rare , only known from few places or only a limited number of specimens (or from one locality, where it is relatively abundant)

very rare, only a few specimens known

26th Nov 2011 16:51 UTCcascaillou

the book I mentionned only gives an estimation of abundance of occurence worldwide, in the terms I mentionned in my first post. It is a book written in french. 'la grande encyclopedie des mineraux', edition Grund, by Rudolf Duda.


I had never noticed that in handbookofmineralogy.org (is that the same book?) , thanks for pointing it to me!

27th Nov 2011 01:58 UTCRock Currier Expert

Yes, that is the book. At the very top of each page/mineral in the Crystal Data: section there is listed the largest size known for crystals, which in a very high percentage of cases if correct at least as far as I have been able to determine.
 
Mineral and/or Locality  
Mindat Discussions Facebook Logo Instagram Logo Discord Logo
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: March 28, 2024 08:52:30
Go to top of page