Home PageMindat NewsThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusManagement TeamContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatSponsor a PageSponsored PagesTop Available PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
What is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthMineral PhotographyThe Elements and their MineralsGeological TimeMineral Evolution
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
StatisticsThe ElementsMember ListBooks & MagazinesMineral MuseumsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice Settings
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day Gallery
How's your provenance?
Posted by Rob Woodside
Rob Woodside July 15, 2012 05:41PMAlthough there are progressive mining companies that attempt to save our mineral heritage, the vast majority of material coming to market is looted. Sometimes this is done with a wink and a nod by the companies to augment the miserable salaries of the miners. I've often thought that mineral specimens are really cheap masterpieces and a mine is like an old master. Once dead or mined out, there will be no more. Now with high end prices in the 6 figures, the mineral market, at least at the high end is starting to look like the art market. Combining cultural heritage with big bucks has produced a demand for provenance for antiquities and mineral specimens may not be too far behind. Here's an article from today's New York times that tells of the travails of high end antiquity collectors.
Bob Harman July 15, 2012 08:41PMROB This is an important and potentially far reaching NYTimes article. Related senarios have already impacted me in my mineral world.
Several years ago our Midwest Chapter of The Friends of Mineralogy (I am the Chapter President) gained access into an Indianapolis quarry where pyrite nodules up to hen's egg size are highly sought after. Collecting was excellent and all attendees came home with many hi quality finds. Shortly thereafter a number of these specimens turned up for sale and/or auction on one or several dealer sites. The quarry found out and complained as they felt our collecting was not meant primarily for "rock collecting", but for immediate financial gain. They could let their own workers do that and make a few extra bucks. They were quite unhappy as we were "looting" their rocks for our financial gain!! THEY HAVE A POINT.
Another senario is that at the October Indiana State Museum mineral show, one of the conditions of specimen sale is that they have to be LEGALLY obtained. This was in writing, as of 2 years ago, in each dealer show contract. That is, mineral specimens to be sold at the Indiana State Museum cannot be collected from places where collecting is illegal like certain federal lands, national parks, the lake shores on Indiana state property etc. Furthermore, since it usually can't be precisely determined when a particular specimen was collected, ALL specimens from illegal areas technically cannot be sold at the museum show even if collected many years ago. This is quite similar to some of what was discussed in this article.
In the near future this might impact some very hi end specimens from the US and abroad..........
Rob Woodside July 16, 2012 12:05AMThanks Bob, So it has begun at the Indiana State Museum and probably elsewhere.Sadly the bureaucrat's answer to any doubts is to ban it all, as is happening with antiquities.
Mont St Hilaire has been closed a couple of times and is currently closed. I think both times at St Hilaire it was the frustration of the Quarry owners that their few bucks per ton roadrock was containing Kilobuck specimens that they didn't have the skill or knowledge to collect themselves. At least they haven't called in the cops to confiscate people's specimens like Richmont did with Nugget Pond Gold specimens.
Michael Hatskel July 16, 2012 12:18AMBob,
I was interested in your story about the Indianapolis quarry field trip. And I hope the relationship with them was not ruined.
In most field trips to the operating aggregate quarries (not talking gemstone mines here):
1. There are no restrictions regarding where and what is allowed to collect. (If there are such restrictions, they must be honored by the collectors, of course.) Most restrictions are normally safety-related, not on the material found there.
2. There is no limitation on the amount of material one could collect during the field trip.
3. There is nothing prohibiting the field trip participants from keeping or disposing their finds any way they choose, including selling.
4. Full freedom of information is in place for all to enjoy: nothing is preventing the quarry personnel from learning about the market for specimens from their quarry. Which is proven by the story you told. It's just the timing of learning that was not optimal...
5. Mineral clubs strive to maintain good relationship with the hosts, especially if some of the quarry personnel show some interest in mineral collecting. But we always talk to them about what's of interest for us in their quarry, and we show them our finds at the end of the trip anyway.
So, in your opinion, what should have been done differently?
Bob Harman July 16, 2012 12:55AMMICHAEL I fully agree with your assessments and in all our field trips the usual conditions and agreements with the quarry managements are stressed. It just so happened that some person (or people) connected with the quarry was knowledgeable about these matters and had the idea to let quarry personnel collect on their personal time. In this quarry the collectible pyrite specimens are very easily found in the pushed aside overburden shale; they were unhappy that so much rapidly turned up for sale shortly after we were there. The collectors are either us or the quarry employees who then sell the specimens to us (as is done in many mining areas). The relationship was strained, but a collector member who is with the Indiana Geology Survey helped smooth over the frayed feelings for a trip into the quarry this past spring (collecting was not good as all had been found prior to that trip). CHEERS.........BOB
Alfredo Petrov July 16, 2012 01:13AMIf any field trip participant sells any of the rocks they collected with permission from private property owners, it would seem to be just common sense and good manners for the seller to spend some percentage of their sales to buy a bottle of good scotch, a subscription to Rocks & Minerals, or some other appropriate present for the landowner or quarry manager. A little thoughtful prevention of negative feelings is easier than trying to assuage negative feelings later.
Bob Harman July 16, 2012 01:33AM
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/16/2012 01:39AM by BOB HARMAN.
Bob Harman July 16, 2012 02:01AMMost quarry field trips around here are attended by about 25 collectors. On most field trips, a FEW of these collectors find a FEW nice calcites or sphalerites or celestites worth a FEW bucks. But in this quarry, on that field trip, over a 4 hour collecting period, 25 collectors EACH found 20 - 40 of these pyrite nodules worth about $20 to $50 apiece (matrix specimens command the premium). Now, if 5 quarry employees collected during some of their personal time every week, then you do the math. The extra money can become VERY substantial. I can understand their unhappiness with our "intrusion". CHEERS..........BOB
Lyla Tracy July 16, 2012 05:00AMI am going to throw my opinion in the ring here from a little different perspective. If something is "given", then in my opinion, the giver shouldn't be upset with what happens with the gift. Obviously, the quarry owner was aware of what the collectors were finding and quite likely wasn't interested in doing the dirty work himself until he saw the money the collectors were making from the sale of the specimens. That, coupled with his jealous employees, who probably felt underpaid and complained to the quarry owner, likely acerbated the situation.
Of course, Alfredo has the ideal solution! A little P.R. goes a long ways and the collectors should have thought of that, and maybe a nice specimen to boot! BTW, I have owned a quarry and few people every bothered to "ask" before digging.
Bob, those are truly gorgeous specimens.
Rock Currier July 16, 2012 08:09AMBob,
At the Indiana State Museum show where there was a clause in the contract that required that the specimen be legally obtained, was there anything in the contract that specified what documents would be accepted as poof that the specimens were legally obtained? Did this apply to foreign as wekk as domestic specimens? Did this also apply to gemstones and jewelry? If this sort of provision was strictly enforced I think that it would be possible for 90% of the dealers in the show to be in the show.
Crystals not pistols.
António Manuel Ináçio Martins July 16, 2012 12:14PMHello friends!!
The subject is interesting because it fits anywhere and here in Portugal there are also some places that currently can not take samples because the owner of the quarry was discovered that they were stupid and take his money from his pockets.
In this case the Museum to legally require the provenance of the samples must have a legal basis. To have a legal basis for any situation relating to the topic will have to be legislated which presupposes that the subject was debated and then approved by appropriate Assembly of this State or of the Nation.
Martins da Pedra
Bob Harman July 16, 2012 03:08PMROCK, I remember the "legally collected" clause because I had considered being a dealer at that show and decided not to for several other reasons. I don't think the wording was more specific and I am pretty sure there were no specific statements about exactly what was considered "proof" of legality. I am, also quite sure the clause was not really enforced; how could it be at a small to medium size show with few real experts in Midwest and USA mineral/mining collecting sites? No crystal or mineral police present! But the museum is a state property and does have a strict code of ethics......that is understandable. All the dealers that have been present these last few years presumably have signed the contract containing that clause. See you all in Denver!! Cheers..........BOB
Alfredo Petrov July 16, 2012 04:35PMIt is quite normal for the fine print in show or auction contracts to contain some variant of an ass-covering clause about not selling anything that isn't supposed to be sold. "Enforcement" has nothing to do with show organizers running around trying to figure out if each specimen was obtained legally or not - it is dependent on property owners (or a government) making a complaint, as has happened in the case of Canadian gold, Argentine meteorites, and recently the Mongolian dinosaur. For ordinary mineral specimens (not talking about high value gem crystals and native gold here) it would be quite exceptional for a mining company to send anyone over to a mineral show to see whether anything from their mine was on sale and to complain about it.
Some complaints have resulted not from mineral shows but rather from property owners googling their property and finding links to rocks on sale on dealers' websites or e-bay. Maybe eventually we'll see dealers labelling their specimens not only with the dreaded "POR" (price on request, or priced out of reach), but also with something like "LOCDAS" (locality divulged after sale) :-( ...Let's hope it doesn't come to that.
Actually, I'm not too pessimistic about this. In recent years I notice an increasing trend towards fine specimens being produced by professional specimen miners who have a contract to lease a locality specifically for specimen mining. If you walk around a mineral show randomly looking at rocks, I think you'll see that only a minor percentage come from illegal plundering, and the percentage of that is dropping, if for no other reasons than that access in "first world" countries is more and more tightly controlled for liability reasons, and mining everywhere in the world is increasingly mechanized, resulting in fewer specimens to be saved in miners' lunchboxes.
Ron Layton July 16, 2012 06:47PMThis isn't news to me. I was selling a collection of cubic diamond crystal micromounts from the Congo in Denver at the 98 show. One of the potential buyers was going to call the police because I didn't have a Certificate of Origin for the diamonds. I believe this was well before the "blood diamond" fiasco but it shows how some people are disturbed or concerned about being in possession of something "illegal".
Robert Farrar July 16, 2012 07:16PMIt there anyone who knows the formal status of rocks, minerals, and fossils collected from Federal lands by hobby collectors? Can they be sold, or must they be gifted? Technically, one must have a special use permit to conduct any business activity on Federal lands.
Bob Harman July 16, 2012 07:36PMAlfredo, et al
Until several years ago there was a pretty good Pittsburgh, PA show at the Carnegie Museum (they have a great mineral display). Again, note that this was a show held in the museum; state owned property adhering to rather strict regulations and ethical standards. The show ended rather abruptly (?) and has not, to my knowledge, been resurrected. Now I am not sure of all the reasons, but they may have had something to do, at least in part, with the legality and ethics of possessing and selling questionably collected specimens. If any of all this discussion is true, it should be duly noted that shows in museums and other state venues have to adhere to a uniformly high ethical standard of specimen provenance which was the original theme of this thread. CHEERS.......BOB
Chris Wright July 16, 2012 08:38PMBob,
I was a dealer at all of the Carnegie shows. The event ended when the Art Museum was having its Biennial. Also,
the main emphasis of the show the next year was the new Dinosaur Hall. It was never revived. It had nothing to do with legality or provenance of mineral specimens.
Reiner Mielke July 17, 2012 12:37AMI find this whole concern about plundered specimens ludicrous. Unless it is something that is being mined of high value such as say diamonds, emeralds or gold then it is really all about sour grapes. The companies that complain will quite happily put the specimens through the crusher and that is fine, but as soon as someone finds something of value beyond what comes out of the crusher, they are all upset about it. These companies should just be happy that something is being preserved of the heritage of the country and quite possibly of scientific value, the price it fetches on the open market is irrelevant. It reminds me of the law in Canada which requires special permission to export any specimen over $10,000 in value, that is unless you crush it first.
Alfredo Petrov July 17, 2012 01:15AMreminds me of the law in Canada which requires special permission to export any specimen over $10,000 in value, that is unless you crush it first.
Reiner, that has long been one of my pet peeves too. And it isn't only Canada: In most of South America, the export of any fossils is prohibited; they are considered "national patrimony". If I pay some poor destitute Indians to collect brachiopods from a limestone quarry and mail them abroad, I've broken the law. If the cement company grinds thousands of them to powder, no law has been broken. Ditto for sharks teeth from a phosphate quarry. IMHO, anyone who breaks such laws by rescuing things from the crushers should be proud of themselves.
Bart Cannon July 17, 2012 02:29AMI could write a long book about this subject.
The only place one can legally and freely collect minerals is one's own mining claim, and then only when the USFS approves your Plan of Operations.
There is an exception to that rule. If you make a royalty agreement with the mine or property owner. I have done that successfully a few times because I pay every penny I promised.
The Sawtooth Wilderness Area allowed a collector to remove about 3 pounds of smoky quartz. Some ranger districts don't care depending upon who the head ranger is. That info is about 15 years old, so don't depend upon my word.
I still collect from road cuts on National Forest lands, but I think that is highly frowned upon, I am "on the move" and don't leave any rocks on the road so I justify that activity as causing no harm and removing the loose rock as a public service.
There is no collecting on Washington Department of Natural Resources lands unless a mineral club has a lease on a particular locality.
Those leases are no longer being offered as far as I know.
At one time, not too long ago the WADNR allowed the removal of three mineral specimens from the Mount Si Natural Recreation Area. Don't know if it still holds. Some friends of mine were arrested for carrying down a pack load of Japan Law twinned quartz from the celebrated northern Mt.Teneriffe breccia zone which is now within the Mount Si Natural Recreation area.
There are some BLM lands which have been designated as collecting areas. Mostly for petrified wood.
There is a good book on the subject. "Collecting the Natural World" by Donald Wolberg and Patsy Reinard.
It is about the legal requirements and personal liability of collecting plants, animals, rocks, minerals and fossils.
The publication date is 1997 so it is probably horribly dated. It does tell the fascinating (frustrating) story of Sue Henderson and Sue the T-Rex.
The field collecting part of our hobby is looking very grim.
Bart Cannon July 17, 2012 02:44AMSorry.
I'm not done.
There is a notion that removing a trivial amount of mineral specimens despoils the natural environment and diminishes the enjoyment of nature by the average visitor to our public lands.
This is utter nonsense, and would never be presented by a person who knows anything about a crystal pocket.
Of what value to society is a tightly packed, clay filled, more or less invisible jumble of junk and crystals to the public ?
Mineral collectors are heroes, bringing the beauty of nature to the general public. They hike in, hike out with a back wrenching pack, collect with care, clean, trim and display.
Without the mineral collector all that beauty would be unknown.
AJMI July 17, 2012 06:06AMBart Cannon wrote: "The only place one can legally and freely collect minerals is one's own mining claim, and then only when the USFS approves your Plan of Operations. There is an exception to that rule. If you make a royalty agreement with the mine or property owner."
I think it all depends on what you mean by "collect". Just casually/recreationally collecting minerals can be done in lots of different places - including on some National Forest Service lands.
For example, according to the United States Department of Agriculture, National Forest Service, Huron-Manistee National Forests website:
"Casual/Recreational gold panning is allowed on most National Forest System lands, as long as it is done by hand and does not involve undercutting stream banks. No permit is required for casual gold panning. The use of sluices and portable dredges is not considered casual. To operate sluices or portable dredges requires a prospecting permit from the Bureau of Land Management. Because the Eastern United States is not subject to the 1872 Mining Law a claim cannot be filed."
"In most areas "Rock hounding" does not require special permission or fee payment when done as recreation, and is consistent with local management objectives. To make sure special permission or fee payment is not necessary please contact the District office in the area you wish to "Rock hound" in."
- Forest visitors are welcome to pick up mineral specimens, rock samples, invertebrate fossil casts and molds, geodes, or other earth oddities, and to pan for gold using hand tools.
- Collecting can be done on National Forest System lands where minerals are owned by others, including areas under federal lease, as long as it does not materially interfere with the rights granted to the mineral permittee/lessee.
United States Department of Agriculture, National Forest Service, Huron-Manistee National Forests website.
FYI: The Huron-Manistee National Forests are two national forests (the Huron National Forest, established in 1909, and the Manistee National Forest, established in 1938) that were combined in 1945. They comprise 978,906 acres (3,960 km2) of public lands, including 5,786 acres (23 km2) of wetlands, extending across the northern lower peninsula of Michigan. The Huron-Manistee National Forests provide recreation opportunities for visitors, habitat for fish and wildlife, and resources for local industry. The headquarters for the forests is in Cadillac, Michigan.
Source: Wikipedia - Huron-Manistee National Forests - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huron-Manistee_National_Forests
Bart Cannon July 17, 2012 09:14AMAJMI,
I don't think that the quotations you mention are universally agreed upon at the current time, but I hope they are.
As I mentioned, it often depends upon the whim of the head ranger.
If you ask the typical head ranger about permission to collect beforehand, you will get the cover my butt response.
And what I am providing is the cover my own butt response from my own collecting diaries from 1965 until 2012.
There are places in Washington State where the US Forest Service Rangers are afraid to get out of their trucks for fear of reprisal from the local claim holders. I consulted for some of them in the Liberty gold district. I suggested putting a bulldozer cut along a survey line, but cautioned that it would take a year to get the plan of operations approved. He laughed at me. He said I'll do it tomorrow.
Bart Cannon July 17, 2012 09:33AMSorry, sorry, sorry.
I'm still not done.
Back in 1963 it was common knowledge that the Clay Center limestone quarry was closed on Sundays and that collecting was either allowed or not patrolled for trespass.
So my dad would take me and my nine year old brother to the bottom of the quarry in his Buick. I can't imagine a more dangerous place to set some little kids free in. I was 13. I found some good stuff. We traveled from Detroit.
Things were fine for a year or two, then the crusher jammed. The crusher jaws were frozen by an Estwing rock hammer. Always a solid tool.
Doesn't take a forensic scientist to reconstruct the evidence nor a very smart risk manager to shut down mineral collecting on their property.
I think the same thing happened at Mont St. Hilaire a few years later with the same result for collectors.
Robert Farrar July 17, 2012 03:20PMAlfredo, et al.,
It does feel good to save something from the certain destruction of the crusher - 'tis a shame that is not always legal. Having been though the SUE T.rex case and follow-up suits, I know that the laws can be enforced in various manners depending upon the discretion of 'enforcer'. Permission granted does not necessarily put one in the clear for specimens collected. These days collecting permission must be very explicit, and the person granting permission must be made aware if there is any possibility that anything collected might be sold. Permission must be sought from the correct person, also. That person must be the one with absolute authority to render decisions, otherwise, as in the SUE T.rex case bad things can happen. We sought permission from the landowner, unaware that this particular situation also required permission from the Secretary of the Interior.
During the following prosecution, we found that as a business we could not collect fossils from Forest Service land, even if we had no intention of selling them. As far as I know, the US government has not granted a commercial permit for fossil collecting from federal lands, outside of petrified wood which is handled as a separate commodity under the Petrified Wood Act. All commercial activity on US Federal lands requires a Special Use Permit of some type. A permit to commercially salvage fossils has just never been granted. As Alfredo mentioned, it is perfectly legal for mines to grind them up.
Mineral collecting rules on Federal lands seem to be somewhat protected under mining laws, but must wonder about collecting things which could not be claimed under mining law, such as quartz and agates, etc.
Ray Hill July 17, 2012 09:17PMI will be going collecting in Southern Spain in October, and our guide told us that the locals are not particularly friendly to foreigners collecting there, because every year a huge influx of European collectors descend on the area and effectively plunder their local sites. His answer to this,
museums, which is sad, since it is a time honored tradition, and one which has saved for posterity many many fine minerals, otherwise destined for the crusher.
Bart Cannon July 18, 2012 12:46AMRobert,
I've been in this game for a VERY long time.
I have yet to encounter a field collector who does not engage in some sort of commercial activity associated with what he drags home..
Could be direct sales or trading with dealers.
If there is a field collector who has never participated in commerce from his finds..... please introduce yourself !!!.
Matt Ciranni July 18, 2012 04:29AMso just so I get this straight...let's say I go to one of my secret collecting sites for Epidote crystals- which is on US Forest Service land. If I bring home some crystals with me that I dug up does that mean I am BREAKING THE LAW?!? Or, if I go to an abandoned mine and pick up a couple sprays of hedenbergite crystals and a piece of massive arsenopyrite, (which I did last weekend)- then I am guilty of a crime?!? Heck, I have seen those sprays of Hedenbergite crystals FROM THIS VERY SPOT for sale on the web for...well, a lot more than I would have thought they were worth, I would say.
It just seems like, as time goes on, laws get more and more absurd, to the point where it is beyond ridiculousness. Whatever happened to public lands for the public?
Bob Harman July 18, 2012 10:41AMMATT If you want to know more about this, read the saga of the Lincoln Co., New Mexico smoky quartz crystals and the trouble the collectors got themselves into. I don't remember the details, but it was an article in (I think) Rocks and Minerals some years ago. Maybe another reader of this blog remembers more and can fill you in. But YES, if you collect crystals from many public US Forest Service lands, you would be breaking the law and they will prosecute! CHEERS (I guess!!)........BOB
David Von Bargen July 18, 2012 11:40AMThe NM smokies were probably from Wilderness land. Those areas have different rules than other BLM or FS lands (mineral entry doesn't apply by law). Abandoned mines might be on patented land or have active claims on them. You need to know the land status before collecting.
Don Saathoff July 18, 2012 03:39PMRE: Sierra Blanco Smokies (Lincoln Co. Saga). The "Smoky Bear Claim" which produced those beautiful crystals was/is on National Forest land. It was NFS rangers who captured the guys (who, by the way, thought they had correctly filed a claim.....oops!) and confiscated many pounds of xls both from their backpacks and their truck. From the nearest place to park to the location is a three-hour hike UP for a young man.......it took Cookie & me four hours. I haven't read the magazine article but know the victims of this fiasco quite well and there is more to it than is generally known. To this day, no one knows what happened to those confiscated plates & singles........
Bob Harman July 18, 2012 05:10PMThanks all for your further info on the Smoky Bear New Mexico claim. For me, the point is that collecting on many lands both public and private can be fraught with problems. This was the original premise of this thread which was that 'the provenance of the specimen might matter".
Here are yet 2 other incidents which come to my memory. Collecting rocks, geodes, and fossils (along with all other plant and animal life) is forbidden by the Indiana DNR on the shorelines of Lake Monroe Reservoir. There is a local university acquaintance who studies microfossils, and as such goes thru bags of mud and fine gravel with his time on a university scanning electron microscope (SEM). Several years ago he had a plastic sandwich bag or two of lakeshore mud in his backpack. An Indiana DNR or conservation officer asked him to empty the bag(s) of mud back onto the lakeshore and not pick up any more! Parenthetically the law states that "recent artifacts" can be collected or picked up. These phrases are euphemisms for GARBAGE!
About 10 years ago a graduate student collected an invertebrate fossil on the lake shore that no one recognized. It was eventually sent off to an expert on unusual invertebrate fossils and the report made it into the periodical "Nature" about June of 2000. The student then made the mistake of showing all this to our local newspaper and it was prominently reported in the newspaper as something like "student collects rare fossil". Anyway, within a few weeks, Indiana conservation officers showed up at his door and made him donate the finding to either the Indiana State Museum or (I think) the Smithsonian where it is today. He faced prosecution of stealing state property if he resisted.
Moral of these stories is that "provenance does matter"
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/18/2012 05:20PM by BOB HARMAN.
Robert Farrar July 18, 2012 05:31PMTruly the point of this entire thread is to point out that no matter where you collect, and whatever you collect (rock, mineral, fossil) it is of utmost importance to have permission from the owner of the land, or whoever owns or controls the appropriate mineral or surface rights. Casual collecting, as allowed on Forest Service and BLM lands does not allow disturbance of the land, so really only involves the surface. Oddly, fossils have been considered part of the surface estate. Someone else holding the mineral rights would not prevent excavation of a fossil. Fossils can be severed from the surface and mineral rights. One exception to this, related to fossils on Native American owned land placed in trust with the US government, is most easily explained as - fossils in the ground are real estate or real property, and to gain permission for their removal one must gain permission from the Department of the interior, through the Bureau of Indian Affairs, as well as from the owner.
In a word, gaining legal permission to collect something can be COMPLICATED. Do your homework before you dig, and the chance of problems arising dramatically decreases.
Kim Macdonald July 18, 2012 05:49PMMy thought was the same as Reiner's, when I originally read this thread, I dream of the day even one of the hundreds of mines in Western Australia would allow a collector in. It would amount to a few cents in lost ore production. A court case here a few years ago came to the same conclusion when a mine worker was charged with stealing specimens, and he was acquitted. If I could investigate the provenance of my low value collection, some may come from dodgey sources. Unless I take up collecting stamps instead, I have little other option. It amounts to an insignifcant proportion of what is destroyed in the mining process, and along the way I am protecting something of far more value. If mining companys were concerned with this, then they would faciltate a method of providing specimens to the public.
Matt Ciranni July 18, 2012 07:20PMfor what it's worth, I did some quick checking and on this site:
from the Idaho Department of Lands, it lays out the laws, rules and regulations for rockhounding on public lands.
From my understanding, it is not nearly as restrictive as Bob would have it sound. it says specifically that:
"All Idaho State endowment lands are open to casual exploration for gemstones and mineral specimens providing they are not under a valid exploration location or mineral lease."
And also: "Rockhounds are welcome to collect rocks and gemstones from most public land administered by the US Forest Service or the Bureau of Land Management, but there are some exceptions..." those exceptions being wilderness areas and areas that are under active mining claims.
I get the feeling that rules governing rock and mineral collecting vary widely by state; some states may be far more restrictive than others. In New Mexico for instance, I understand there was an effort to ban rockhounding in an area that was actually called "Rockhound State Park!" (I dont know if that ban was successfully passed.) But from the sound of it, it is NOT a crime to dig crystals on US forest service land in Idaho, at any rate. Now if I was to go in with heavy machinery and start digging away, then I would probably need to file a mining claim, and I believe there ARE some regulations concerning re-selling items that you collected yourself without a permit, however it is apparently NOT a crime to simply do some casual specimen hunting on MOST public lands.
Robert Farrar July 18, 2012 08:41PMMatt,
Notice that most of my post refers to fossils, which have more restrictive regulations than minerals. Also, please check the CFR's for the federal definition of casual collecting, before doing anything more than overturning a rock. Always check with the local land management offices before you collect, to get an understanding of local policies and procedure. They often can direct you to collecting sites. Regulations governing state lands are often more lenient than federal regulations, but most states, at least out west, have far more federal land than state land. With just a few state land exceptions, fossils for the private sector are collected only from private land.
Collecting crystals from Forest Service land in Idaho may not be a problem, but digging might be, even just with pick and shovel. Check to be sure, before you dig. If you want to open a large scale dig, using powered equipment, there will generally be state permits and federal mine plans required before your claim can be worked.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2018, except where stated. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2018, except where stated. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters.