Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Improving Mindat.org"Ochre" Mineral Page - photo error

6th Feb 2012 14:44 UTCPeter Cristofono

The mineral page for "Ochre" features a photo of hematite variety "iron rose" - a beautiful specimen, but not ochre.



http://www.mindat.org/min-27440.html

17th Feb 2012 01:26 UTCReiner Mielke Expert

The Ochre page is wrong in many different ways for a good description see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ochre

21st Feb 2012 11:21 UTCRalph S Bottrill 🌟 Manager

More of these infuriating multi synonymns that are not synonymns at all! We should get rid of these for all the Fe, Sb, Mo and Pb ochres too, the pictures are particularly totally misleading. More accurate to call them mixtures.

22nd Feb 2012 18:10 UTCUwe Kolitsch Manager

Or not allow any photos maybe.

26th Feb 2012 06:51 UTCRalph S Bottrill 🌟 Manager

Yes Uwe, unless we are just careful to select very appropriate photos? I have done this with a couple (uglier but more appropriate photos).


But there is still a disturbing issue with having the locations for eg. iron ochres showing every known occurrences of hematite, goethite etc, whether as an ochre or not (26,000). There probably are thousands of occurrences of ochre worldwide, but nobody photographs them, and I could only fine one picture labelled as such, so added that to the iron ochre page. Similarly not every massicot is earthy, so its not an ochre, etc.


Some ochres are already listed as mixtures rather than synonyms. I have tried to edit iron and lead ochres to mixtures, but it does not cooperate!


Until we get rid of multi-synonyms we keep presenting people with badly misleading images and data!

26th Feb 2012 08:52 UTCJolyon Ralph Founder

These are not multi-synonyms. They need to be changed.


They can be set as mixtures, or simply a plain mineral with the list of possible identities in the description.


As we remember from basic Mindat Lesson number 1.


A synonym is only the case where A = B (or A = B, C and D) and B is also always = A (or B, C and D are always = A)


So this is simply a matter of something that has not been categorized correctly.


Edit it (as I have for 'ochre' and 'antimony ochre', both in different ways to show what I mean) and problem will go away.


Jolyon

27th Feb 2012 12:27 UTCRalph S Bottrill 🌟 Manager

Jolyon, it probably best to call them mixtures rather than minerals, but the problem is the system wont let me change the classification once they are listed as synonyms.

27th Feb 2012 13:21 UTCAlfredo Petrov Manager

Now Ochre is listed as a mixture of a long list of things. Such a witches' recipe has probably never existed in nature at all. I think terms with as much vagueness and as many different uses as "ochre" are best not linked to anything else, neither "varieties", nor "synonyms", nor "mixtures", just an isolated page with no links to anything else and a descriptive paragraph on the historical uses of the word. (Individual varieties mentioned in the description can be linked to their respective pages, but not the "Ochre" itself.)

28th Feb 2012 12:01 UTCRalph S Bottrill 🌟 Manager

Alfredo, that's true, though unprefixed "ochre " is generally considered to be mostly iron oxides, and all the other ochres are usually prefixed, it could be confusing to call it a synonym still. You could not consider it a mineral or compound, Maybe we need a different classification for such things? (or is it a rock?).

28th Feb 2012 13:26 UTCAlfredo Petrov Manager

Yes, Ralph, it doesn't fit any of our classifications. It's more of a textural term than anything synonymous with any particular mineral, variety, group of minerals or mixtures. I think calling it a mixture is wrong, because some ochres may be pure. That's why I think the page should just stand alone, with its written description, and not get linked to anything.

29th Feb 2012 13:12 UTCRalph S Bottrill 🌟 Manager

Fair enough, I quite agree but how can you have an unclassified page?

29th Feb 2012 13:18 UTCJolyon Ralph Founder

The "Mineral" option is what Alfredo is talking about - this is simply an entry that does not need to link directly or refer to others (as variety and synonyms do, for example).


Jolyon

1st Mar 2012 13:18 UTCRalph S Bottrill 🌟 Manager

I could be pedantic and say it cannot be a mineral if its not of fixed chemical composition etc, but maybe I should just let it go as at least it looks Ok now.;-)
 
Mineral and/or Locality  
Mindat Discussions Facebook Logo Instagram Logo Discord Logo
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: March 28, 2024 15:59:15
Go to top of page