SUPPORT US. Covid-19 has significantly affected our fundraising. Please help!
Log InRegister
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsBooks & Magazines
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice Settings
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryMineral Photography

Bessie-Maple Prospect, Port Clarence District, Nome Borough, Alaska, USA

This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Location: The Bessie-Maple prospect is located along the Rapid River fault where it crosses a north-south ridge that separates Lost River valley from the Curve Creek drainage. This is on the west side of Lost River valley (elevation 500 to 570 feet) just across and upstream from the mouth of Tin Creek. The Bessie-Maple prospect merges to the east with the Lost River Valley prospect (TE041). This is locality 6 of Cobb and Sainsbury (1972). Cobb (1975) summarized rlevant references under the name 'Bessie & Maple'.
Geology: Polymetallic, sulfide-bearing veins, veinlets, replacements, and fracture fillings in Ordovician limestone are locally present over about 1,200 feet of the east-west trending Rapid River fault zone. Sainsbury (1969, 1972) maps the Rapid River fault as a 12-mile long, east-west trending thrust fault in the southern part of the York Mountains although stratigraphic relations across the fault suggest normal displacement. Fluorite and beryllium-bearing mineralization has apparently developed peripheral to the sulfide veins. Lamprophyre dikes and a small plug are present in the mineralized area. Sulfide vein mineralogy is complex. Knopf (1908, p. 57-58) described a 1-foot wide zone of stringer veinlets containing wolframite, stannite, and galena with topaz and fluorite. Steidtmann and Cathcart (1922) described fractured and kaolinized dike rocks, some with disseminated tourmaline and fluorite, cemented with thin seams of galena, pyrite, and chalcopyrite and in places with 3-inch wide vertical stibnite-bearing veins. Sainsbury (1965; 1969, p. 64) described a 1-foot wide diamond drill intercept of semi-massive sulfides containing stannite, pyrite, arsenopyrite, and galena. Grades reported for sulfide-rich samples include trace to 0.03 opt gold, 4.2 to 25.6 opt silver, 0.5 to 9.1 % Pb, 0.48 to 1.53% Cu, about 3% Zn, 0.3 to 1.6% Sn, up to 3.2% WO3 and 3% Sb (Berg and Cobb, 1967, p. 132). Fluorite, chrysoberyl, white mica, and tourmaline are present in replacements of limestone and dolomite peripheral to the sulfide-bearing veins. One sample from the Bessie-Maple adit dump contained 0.39% BeO and 59% fluorite (Sainsbury, 1963, p. 8). Samples from three short USBM diamond drill holes had up to 0.79% BeO and 75% fluorite (Mulligan, 1965). Five inclined diamond drill holes completed by Lost River Mining Corporation through the near vertical fluorite mineralization had average intersections of 60 feet grading 34% fluorite (WGM, 1972, p. 54). Three of these five holes also intersected sulfide mineralization. These intersections were: (1) 10 feet of 0.18% Sn, 0.11% Pb, 4.9% Zn, 0.15% Cu, and 1.34 opt Ag; (2) 4.5 feet of 0.22 % lead, 1.89 % Zn, and 1 opt Ag; and (3) 2 feet of 0.27% Pb and 2.17% Zn (WGM, 1972, p. 72). Another diamond drill hole drilled vertically at a location north of the main Bessie-Maple prospect encountered 46 feet of 21.2 % fluorite, 0.23% Pb, 0.38 % Cu, and 1.3 opt Ag in the uppermost part of the hole (WGM, 1972, p. 72-73).
Workings: Older workings are a 150-foot adit and various suface pits and trenches. The USBM completed three short diamond drill holes totalling 399 feet on the eastern part of the mineralized area near where it merges with the Lost River valley prospect. Lost River Mining Corporation drilled 8 diamond drill holes totalling 1,905 feet in the prospect area (WGM, 1972, p. 63).
Age: The mineralization is assumed to be related to the development of tin systems in the Lost River area and therefore Late Cretaceous, the age of the tin-mineralizing granites there (Hudson and Arth, 1983).
Alteration: The limestone is commonly dolomitized but the relation of this alteration to sulfide and fluorite mineralization is not clear. Lamprophere dikes are kaolinized and locally contain disseminated tourmaline and fluorite. Fluorite veining and replacement is in effect a type of alteration here that can be thought of as distal alteration to more intense, tin metallization at depth. Mass balance calculations show significant SiO2, Al22O3, alkali, and fluorine enrichment with this type of alteration (Sainsbury, 1968, p. 1567).
Reserves: Not defined

Commodities (Major) - Ag, Cu, Pb, Sn, W., Zn; (Minor) - Au, Be, fluorite
Development Status: None
Deposit Model: Fluorite-, beryllium-, and sulfide-bearing veins, veinlets, and replacements in

Mineral List

11 entries listed. 9 valid minerals.

The above list contains all mineral locality references listed on This does not claim to be a complete list. If you know of more minerals from this site, please register so you can add to our database. This locality information is for reference purposes only. You should never attempt to visit any sites listed in without first ensuring that you have the permission of the land and/or mineral rights holders for access and that you are aware of all safety precautions necessary.


Cobb, E.H., 1975, Summary of references to mineral occurrences (other than mineral fuels and construction materials) in the Teller quadrangle, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 75-587, 130 p. Cobb, E.H., and Sainsbury, C.L., 1972, Metallic mineral resources map of the Teller quadrangle, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-426, 1 sheet, scale 1:250,000. Hudson, T.L., and Arth, J. G., 1983, Tin granites of Seward Peninsula, Alaska: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 94, p. 768-790. Knopf, Adolph, 1908, Geology of the Seward Peninsula tin deposits, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 358, 71 p. Mulligan, J.J., 1965, Diamond drill sampling data, fluorite-beryllium deposits, Lost River valley, Seward Peninsula, Alaska, 1964, with a section on petrography by Walter L. Gnagy, and a section on laboratory concentration tests by Richard Havens: U.S. Bureau of Mines Open-File Report 7-65, 94 p., 1 sheet. Sainsbury, C.L., 1963, Beryllium deposits of the western Seward Peninsula, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 479, 18 p. Sainsbury, C.L., 1968, Tin and beryllium deposits of the central York Mountains, Alaska, in Ridge, J. D., ed., Ore deposits in the United States, 1933-67: American Institute of Mining, Metallurgy, and Petroleum Engineers, v. 2, p. 1555-1572. Sainsbury, C.L., 1969, Geology and ore deposits of the central York Mountains, western Seward Peninsula, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1287, 101 p. Sainsbury, C.L., 1972, Geologic map of the Teller quadrangle, Seward Peninsula, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Map I-685, 4 p., 1 sheet, scale 1:250,000. Steidtmann, Edward, and Cathcart, S. H., 1922, Geology of the York tin deposits, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 733, 130 p. WGM Ltd., 1972, Preliminary feasibility report on the Lost River fluorite-tin-tungsten: Toronto, Canada, Lost River Mining Company, Limited, unpublished report, 291 p.

Mineral and/or Locality is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Public Relations by Blytheweigh.
Copyright © and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2020, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us Current server date and time: August 10, 2020 17:38:22 Page generated: January 20, 2015 10:44:14
Go to top of page