Log InRegister
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsBooks & Magazines
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice Settings
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryMineral Photography

Marmot upper basin Prospect, Hyder District, Prince of Wales-Outer Ketchikan Borough, Alaska, USA

This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
 
 
The Marmot group of 51 claims that were staked in 1969 covered all or parts of the old Jumbo (Banded Mountain) (BC021), Galena (BC022), and Edelweiss (BC023) prospects, which are described separately in this report. The Marmot upper basin prospect area was only recently exposed by retreat of glacial ice. The prospect was active in 1973. Site is in Misty Fiords National Monument.
Location: The Marmot upper basin prospect (Berg and others, 1977, p. 106) is in Section 26 on the southeast side of Banded Mountain at an elevation of about 4600 to 4750 feet. This location is accurate to within about a quarter of a mile.
Geology: The country rocks in the general area of this prospect (Berg and others, 1977, p. 15-18, 22; Koch, 1996) are banded variegated pelitic hornfels, phyllite, and fine-grained schist of the Jurassic or older Mesozoic Hazelton Group. The metasedimentary rocks are intruded by andesite dikes that may be apophyses of the Triassic Texas Creek Granodiorite, and by aplite dikes that may be apophyses of Eocene Hyder Quartz Monzonite. The mineral deposit (Berg and others, 1977, p. 100, 106, 110, 112; Elliott and Koch, 1981, p. 9, loc. 19) consists of a stockwork(?) of quartz [-calcite] veins up to about 3 feet thick in locally iron-stained dark pelitic hornfels of the Hazelton Group. The veins contain pyrite, chalcopyrite, molybdenite, and galena. The highest assay values reported from vein and hostrock samples collected by the U.S. Bureau of Mines in 1972 were 2000 ppm Mo, 5000 ppm Pb, 3000 ppm Cu, 150 ppm Ag, and 0.1 ppm Au. Lead-isotope studies of the galena at the Marmot upper basin prospect (Maas and others, 1995, p. 229-248) indicate that the deposit is Eocene in age, contemporaneous with emplacement of the Hyder Quartz Monzonite.
Workings: Highest assay values reported from veins and hostrock samples collected by U.S. Bureau of Mines in 1972 were 2000 ppm Mo, 5000 ppm Pb, 3000 ppm Cu, 150 ppm Ag, and 0.1 ppm Au.
Age: Lead-isotope studies of the galena at the Marmot upper basin prospect (Maas and others, 1995, p. 229-248) indicate that the deposit is Eocene in age, contemporaneous with emplacement of the Hyder Quartz Monzonite.
Alteration: Local intense iron staining

Commodities (Major) - Ag, Cu, Mo, Pb; (Minor) - Au, Zn
Development Status: None
Deposit Model: Polymetallic veins

Mineral List



6 entries listed. 6 valid minerals.

The above list contains all mineral locality references listed on mindat.org. This does not claim to be a complete list. If you know of more minerals from this site, please register so you can add to our database. This locality information is for reference purposes only. You should never attempt to visit any sites listed in mindat.org without first ensuring that you have the permission of the land and/or mineral rights holders for access and that you are aware of all safety precautions necessary.

References

Berg, H.C., Elliott, R.L., Smith, J.G., Pittman, T.L., and Kimball, A. L., 1977, Mineral resources of the Granite Fiords Wilderness Study Area, Alaska, with a section on aeromagnetic data by Andrew Griscom: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1403, 151 p. Elliott, R.L., and Koch, R.D., 1981, Mines, prospects, and selected metalliferous mineral occurrences in the Bradfield Canal quadrangle, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 81-728-B, 23 p., 1 sheet, scales 1:250,000 and 1:63,360. Koch, R.D., 1996 [In press), Reconnaissance geologic map of the Bradfield Canal quadrangle, southeastern Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report, 1 sheet, scale 1:250,000. Maas, K.M., Bittenbender, P E., and Still, J.C., 1995, Mineral investigations in the Ketchikan mining district, southeastern Alaska: U.S. Bureau of Mines Open-File Report 11-95, 606 p.

 
Mineral and/or Locality  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Public Relations by Blytheweigh.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2020, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us Current server date and time: February 17, 2020 09:42:42 Page generated: January 26, 2015 16:09:47
Go to top of page