IMPORTANT MESSAGE. We need your support now to keep mindat.org running. Click here to find out why.
Log InRegister
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for Educators
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
StatisticsThe ElementsUsersBooks & MagazinesMineral MuseumsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice Settings
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day Gallery
bannerbannerbannerbannerbannerbanner

Refractive index with a laser?

Posted by Mathieu Butler  
avatar
Mathieu Butler October 11, 2018 09:44PM
I've been wondering why we need an expensive (gem) refractometer to get refractive index, why can't a simple laser pointer be used and the deviation from the norm calculated to get the RI?
I think the laser method can be used for liquids - maybe too tough to get the angle right on solid transparent xls with faces?
avatar
Doug Daniels October 11, 2018 10:02PM
Yes, I would think that getting the angle correct using a "simple laser pointer" would be a major problem - even a fraction of a degree off and you get a bogus reading. Also, isn't RI dependent on the color of light used, especially if monochromatic, as a laser pointer would be? (I could be wrong.... never had to determine RI on anything, it's on my bucket list).
avatar
Frank K. Mazdab October 11, 2018 10:25PM
Yes, RI is dependent on the wavelength of light... the greater the difference between the red and violet ends, the greater the dispersion of a material. But dispersion is tabulated for many materials (or at least should be for materials where it isn't), so use of monochromatic light shouldn't be a problem. Food for thought: an instrument that uses a separate red laser, green laser, and blue-violet laser could be made made into a hand-held "disperometer" (lol). Sounds like someone needs to build this better mousetrap, and then we the mice will come...



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/11/2018 10:27PM by Frank K. Mazdab.
avatar
David Von Bargen October 12, 2018 08:42AM
The standard wavelength used to determine RI is the sodium doublet (in the yellow range).
avatar
Kevin Hean October 12, 2018 02:28PM
If they do build the better mouse trap, PLEASE let it be digital and not a blurry shadow :-)
avatar
Doug Daniels October 12, 2018 10:35PM
David -
That's what I thought. Other wavelengths give slightly different results hence why they are used to determine dispersion.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/12/2018 10:36PM by Doug Daniels.
avatar
John Attard October 18, 2018 06:50AM
A gem refractometer is inexpensive, much cheaper than most gems!

It is compact and can handle tiny samples. Instead of a sodium lamp one can buy a special yellow light from Gem-A instruments called a "Sodium Line 590nm Refractometer Lamp".
I have one, you can't borrow it, get your own, you will be happy!
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login



bannerbannerbannerbannerbannerbanner
Mineral and/or Locality  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2018, except where stated. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us Current server date and time: October 22, 2018 03:13:39
Go to top of page