Donate now to keep alive!Help|Log In|Register|
Home PageMindat NewsThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusManagement TeamContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatSponsor a PageSponsored PagesTop Available PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
What is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthMineral PhotographyThe Elements and their MineralsGeological TimeMineral Evolution
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
StatisticsThe ElementsMember ListBooks & MagazinesMineral MuseumsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice Settings
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day Gallery

Mindat mineral database: some questions

Posted by Reynaldo Contreira  
Reynaldo Contreira February 28, 2012 02:36AM
Dear all,

Could you please help a poor mineral collector to understand some status shown in the mindat database?
I compared some of them with the IMA/CNMNC list of mineral names (2009) or follow the new messages at IMA status forum and I got a little confused.

Minerals shown as Grandfathered:
ANORTHOCLASE: should not be considered as “intermediate member”?
SCHIRMERITE: was not discredited (IMA/CNMNC list of mineral names from 2009)?
MAGNESIOASTROPHYLLITE: should not be considered as “published without approval”?

Minerals shown as approved:
HYDROXYLBASTNÄSITE-(Ce): should not be considered as “published without approval” like -(La)?
NATROKOMAROVITE: should not be considered as “published without approval”?
VEATCHITE-A: should not be considered as polymorph of VEATCHITE?
IVANYUKITE-Na-T and IVANYUKITE-Na-C are not polymorphs of IVANYUKITE-Na?

Other cases:
FERRIPEDRIZITE was discredited?
UVITE, “Hydroxyuvite”, IMA 2000-030: very confusing for me
Synonyms for GITTINSITE: IMA 1979-034 seems to be ok, but not IMA 1970-034 (refers to TAKANELITE ?)
SARRABUSITE should not be included in the database?

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Mineral and/or Locality is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2018, except where stated. relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us Current server date and time: January 20, 2018 07:33:16
Go to top of page