SUPPORT US. If mindat.org is important to you, click here to donate to our Fall 2019 fundraiser!
Log InRegister
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsBooks & Magazines
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice Settings
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryMineral Photography

Mineral PhotographySharpening photos

22nd Jun 2011 07:26 BSTHarjo Neutkens Manager

Sharpening photographs.

Many people do, the only problem is that most sharpening tools do not deliver very good results, the other problems being the fact that you often loose a considerable amount of resolution (for instance; sharpen a pic of 2.8Mb, with some sharpening tools you end up with only 1.5Mb) or end up with a very grainy photograph.

For anyone wanting to sharpen their pics there is an alternative way, where you don't have to use the obvious sharpening software, but will render very good results.

What you do is very simple: you stack (for instance with CombineZ) two frames of exactly the same photograph (the one that you want to sharpen). The result will be much sharper then the two identical initial frames. Afterwards crop the photo to get rid of the edges produced by the stacking sequence.

It beats most, if not all, sharpening tools.

Of course, a good photographer using the proper gear doesn't need to do any sharpening, but I'm afraid I do......


Cheers,


Harjo

22nd Jun 2011 09:57 BSTJolyon Ralph Founder

Sharpening tricks and techniques vary significantly depending on your camera, and of course software available to you.


First of all, always shoot images from your camera in RAW format, otherwise sharpening is just going to emphasise the jpeg compression artefacts.


Using photoshop raw converter to load and process your raw images is a good idea. Read up online about the best settings for your raw images - this will depend on your camera.


This is also one area where the free 'gimp' software simply is no match for photoshop.


Jolyon

22nd Jun 2011 10:55 BSTVolker Betz Expert

Hello Harjo,


I confess that I always check how shapening can improve my pictures. I use Helicon filter after stacking with Helicon Focus or Zerene stacker. Zerene stacker is an alternative with difficult stacks in pyramid modus but slow with 40 or so layers while Helicon focus is very fast now, with Version 5.2.4. Pro. I stack mostly with method B with JPG files. Stacks of 40 pics in raw .... ?.


Because I am used to it, I finish my pictures (resize and label) with Irfan View 4.2.8. I check sharpening if I have resized to my personal Website resolution (722 pixel hight) but it is mostly no improvement if I have used sharpening in Helicon Filter.


Cheers


Volker

22nd Jun 2011 14:37 BSTJeff Weissman Expert

You can do some fancy work in Photoshop with unsharp mask and high-pass filtering. Usually you only need to sharpen when there is a significant change in pixel size of the image, going from 3000 pixels to what Mindat asks for, 1024 pixels max, for example. I would not sharpen an image at its native (camera-produced) resolution. If and when I sharpen, it is the very last step, when I am ready to save the image as a jpg file type. I usually work in photoshop format, as I can save image layers.

4th Oct 2011 07:11 BSTJamey Swisher

Actually when resizing it is not actually sharpness you are losing so much as local contrast, which is perceived by the human eye as a lack of sharpness. A simple use of curves and USM to do local contrast enhancement is typically more then enough. One should seldom ever use the "sharpening" tool in any editing program! You are always better off using the unsharp mask. But the settings for it are dependent on the shot, equipment used, etc., as Jolyon stated, there is no real magic setting. Although if you use Adobe Photoshop I do have an action set I wrote for sharpening that works fairly well universally, drop me a message if interested and I will email it to you.


Also, by sharpening an image you would NOT drop in image size. If you are dropping in image size you are resizing not just sharpening. Graininess is because you are either over sharpening or using the improper method of sharpening. Most often a curves adjustment is more useful then sharpening is.

10th Feb 2012 13:19 GMTZbynek Burival Expert

I do it this way http://photographingminerals.com/picture_downsizing.php - Unsharp mask is best tool for me. You can use some other sharpening techniques with layers and so but you can not use that for every photo, it is too time consuming.


With unsharp mask is very wise to set treshold to 1, otherwise you "sharpen" also noise. If there is excessive noise better first denoise, then use brutal sharpening and downsize and sharpen again.


For resizing is good to use bicubic or bicubic sharper methods to keep maximum sharpness. And of course save as high quality JPEG, or you will loose details with compression.


RAW is great but most P&S cameras do not have it and even most enthusiast folks with DSLR do not use it. If you can use it, it helps a lot. But mostly with exposure, white balance and such things.

10th Feb 2012 15:54 GMTHarald Schillhammer Expert

I have tried so many sharpening methods in my life that I lost count - edge sharpening, high pass sharpening, mid tone sharpening, etc..


Nowadays I solely use USM (radius 0.5, threshhold 0) on two separate layers (one set to "darken", the other to "lighten" with different opacities). I have recorded this as a PS action with a Stop to adjust the USM setting (because this depends on the image size). So, no time loss at all.


cheers
 
Mineral and/or Locality  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. Public Relations by Blytheweigh.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2019, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us Current server date and time: August 25, 2019 06:15:42
Go to top of page