Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography
╳Discussions
💬 Home🔎 Search📅 LatestGroups
EducationOpen discussion area.Fakes & FraudsOpen discussion area.Field CollectingOpen discussion area.FossilsOpen discussion area.Gems and GemologyOpen discussion area.GeneralOpen discussion area.How to ContributeOpen discussion area.Identity HelpOpen discussion area.Improving Mindat.orgOpen discussion area.LocalitiesOpen discussion area.Lost and Stolen SpecimensOpen discussion area.MarketplaceOpen discussion area.MeteoritesOpen discussion area.Mindat ProductsOpen discussion area.Mineral ExchangesOpen discussion area.Mineral PhotographyOpen discussion area.Mineral ShowsOpen discussion area.Mineralogical ClassificationOpen discussion area.Mineralogy CourseOpen discussion area.MineralsOpen discussion area.Minerals and MuseumsOpen discussion area.PhotosOpen discussion area.Techniques for CollectorsOpen discussion area.The Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryOpen discussion area.UV MineralsOpen discussion area.Recent Images in Discussions
GeneralPOTD: Clara Predominance, Micromount Supremacy
1st Dec 2017 21:12 UTCOlivier Mével Expert
Congratulations for the talent of the photographers who bring us such nice shots.
There are more than 297300 localities listed in Mindat database (Clara mine represents 0,00033% of those localities) and this year "Clara" was rewarded with 8,9 % of the Photo of the Day. What a feat! Are the minerals there more peculiar ? Is it the conjunction between talented photographers and special minerals? Or else?
Anyway, congratulations to Michael and Edgar for their pictures. However i'm struck with the contrast between such nice micromount shots and the poor photogenic locality photos chosen to illustrate the Clara mine page!! One can not have everything! Can it be improved?
More nice photos from "Clara" are expected in the following weeks and sure the Black Forest will never be blacklisted!!
Those Clara mine photos also show the micromount photography supremacy in the POTD. It deserves such honour as the work to capture such nice shots is hard and everyone knows that this tiny mineral planet reveals so many treasures... This year, micromount photos have represented 64% of the POTD (215), macromineral (> 1 cm) pictures 24% (81) and locality or other photos 12% (39). Are macrominerals less "sexy" ? Beautiful locality picture aren't they worth? Have managers a weakness for micromount photos when they select the pictures for the POTD lottery?
A suggestion for a fair competition would be to create a POTD TRIPTYCH with a micromount photo, a macro mineral shot and a locality (or other) picture, every day. It would have the merit of sharing more beautiful pictures with the Mindat community and encourage those who do not have the opportunity to devote time and resources to micromineral photography.
Olivier.
2nd Dec 2017 22:02 UTCRalph S Bottrill 🌟 Manager
2nd Dec 2017 22:40 UTCRalph S Bottrill 🌟 Manager
3rd Dec 2017 03:16 UTCNorman King 🌟 Expert
Here’s another one: I took this photo of Sweet Home mine in September of 2015, and suggested in my original comments that the activity revealed here could indicate that the mine wasn’t closed for good after all. On November 27, 2017, The Collector’s Edge announced on their “blogs” that a new adit was being prepared to allow continued mining for rhodochrosite at the Sweet Home site. The new operations are to be called ”Detroit City mine” because they will not connect with any of the Sweet Home diggings. Nevertheless, you heard about the renewed operations here on Mindat first through this photo I uploaded.
3rd Dec 2017 05:51 UTCChristian Auer 🌟 Expert
In my opinion the only reason of it should be to support beginners and nothing more.
As we have a debate about it almost every week I would suggest to stop with it.
3rd Dec 2017 09:18 UTCOlivier Mével Expert
Debate is the essence of this messageboard.
If there is an iterative debate maybe it is because there is matter of question concerning the POTD and that some members feel concerned.
The POTD exists, that's a fact.
Mineral photography is the beating heart of Mindat.org and the POTD is supposed to be a daily expression of mineral photography quintessence (extreme quality pictures or original breathtaking shots).
For a majority of members photography can't be separated to their mineral passion and that thanks to Mindat.
A large amount of members love sharing their pictures and spend time, accuracy (and money) before uploading what they feel their best shots to be worth entering the database.
An immediate expression of this proof is the "Best photographs of specimens larger than 1cm" thread following this present one on the messageboard today. Rudolf, who created this fantastic thread said in 2013: "I can see lots of excellent photographs of micro mounts but not very many of larger specimens". So many of those photos in this thread are potential POTD and few of them have been.
What i mean, and that's a straight interest of the POTD, is that we have a direct access on the front page to "special" quality photos with the POTD and, what i also meant, as Ralph said, "we should aim for more diversity". And a triptych POTD could be a solution...
Kind regards. Olivier
3rd Dec 2017 14:23 UTCEd Clopton 🌟 Expert
I don't know about a POTD triptych--the home page is pretty full as it is, and three little POTDs would end up being less effective than the current one POTD.
3rd Dec 2017 14:41 UTCNorman King 🌟 Expert
So, many people want more variety in POTD’s. So do I. An issue for some of mine is that they are more “rocky,” rather than focusing on minerals. OK, here are some of mine that discuss the minerals more. But. of course, those minerals all form rocks, don't they?
This one shows dark green phenocrysts in metamorphosed mafic igneous rock. The phenocrysts are surrounded by thin whitish reaction rims. Their blocky shapes suggest a pyroxene group mineral, but close inspection shows they are intergrown amphibole and biotite group minerals, apparently formed during the metamorphism. Exposed along Canada Hwy 17 between Hemlo and White River.
This one shows a complex fabric in blueschist suggesting pillow lava, with glaucophane-dominated “pillows” separated by apparent hyaloclastic matrix now altered to muscovite and/or actinolite-tremolite series amphiboles. Exposed at the Bandon Jetty near Coos Bay, Oregon.
Blueschist with possible remnant lava pillows, Coquille River Jetty
Tupper Rock, Bandon, Coos County, Oregon, USA
Tupper Rock, Bandon, Coos County, Oregon, USA
Quite a few of my field photos (probably a better term than "locality photos") have plenty of geological impact. In fact, that is why I took the photos, in the first place. Of course, especially for our group, photos of important mineral collecting sites (or just run-of-the-mill sites) for minerals are also important. In my lectures I tried to show people how the Earth talks to me, and what it says. That shows in the often lengthy stories I tell to accompany photos of outcrops and even for the specimens in my collection at the house.
4th Dec 2017 00:20 UTCHarjo Neutkens Manager
The last 20 days saw 5 photos of full view photos of specimens, 9 photomicrographs, 5 locality photos (of which one was a LIDAR scan) and 1 SEM photo.
I think that this is not a bad score regarding diversity. The reason why photomicrographs usually score a bit higher in the count is that the pool with excellent photos is much bigger than, for instance, the pool with excellent full view photos of specimens. This in turn can be explained by the fact that making microphotographs is a specific hobby where people tend to go through great lengths to create an aesthetic and technically good photo of highly photogenic objects. Some people do the same when taking full view photographs from specimens but the amount of 'snapshots' is far greater in this category.
The fact that there have been a good deal of Clara photos can be explained by the fact that the Clara mine happens to produce an enormous amount of very beautiful (micro)minerals, in many cases the most beautiful examples of some mineral species in the world. This combined with the fact that a few very talented photographers show an interest in photographing these specimens results in outstanding mineral photos.
I'd like to encourage everyone who would like their photos, whether they be photomicrographs, full view photos, locality photos or whatever, of minerals from localities they favour to go the extra mile and invest time, study, creativity and, how mundane it may sound, money (some photographers have invested tens of thousand dollars in their equipment, although I'm not saying money can or should buy excellence, excellent photos can be made on a shoestring budget as well!!) in making great photos. If a photo stands out (and this does not at all mean that it should be a 'sexy' photo) it will be selected for POTD.
Cheers,
Harjo
4th Dec 2017 02:03 UTCAlfredo Petrov Manager
4th Dec 2017 03:20 UTCTony Peterson Expert
Cabinet specimens of comparable scaled-up quality are much rarer and would drain most bank accounts quickly! Sadly, only dealers* and itinerant professional photographers get to work with many of those. The former are mostly too busy to help us and the latter need to sell their images.
Jolyon is trying to move Mindat into petrological images (i.e., specific rock types) and I think this should work well. And mines are so vital to our hobby that site pictures are important. But pushing further into tectonics, structural geology, etc. I would judge to be a mistake, unless it is relevant to mineral assemblages or features. There are other sites for this, e.g.
Tony
* Which leads me into another of my pet peeves, the zillions of dealer-generated poor quality, low-resolution images of terrific cabinet specimens on this site. I realize many of these are essentially "historical" (many were probably originally analog photographs! quelle horreur!!) and were vital to get the site started.......but it always frustrates me when I try to zoom in on one to see details, and all I get are fat pixels. I do note with satisfaction that the recent work of some dealers, such as Fabre and Quebel, is much better in that regard and I for one thank them for uploading their images. I even manage to own one or two of them :)
4th Dec 2017 16:08 UTCDonald B Peck Expert
4th Dec 2017 20:03 UTCJeff Weissman Expert
4th Dec 2017 21:13 UTCHarjo Neutkens Manager
The choice which photo gets selected from the pool of POTD candidates is a random one, and we like to keep the random aspect because we think that's the most democratic process. We do however try to catch the instances where the random program selects two consecutive photos from either the same photographer, mineral or locality, but every now and then one or two might escape our attention.
5th Dec 2017 00:45 UTCTony Peterson Expert
5th Dec 2017 06:56 UTCDavid Von Bargen Manager
Mindat.org Photo of the Day - 22nd Jan 2015
Mindat.org Photo of the Day - 23rd Jan 2016
https://www.mindat.org/gallery.php?frm_id=pager&cform_is_valid=1&min=&loc=&u=&potd=1&pco=&d=&showtype=1&photoclass=1&phototype=31&checkall=&rockmin=&filtmin=0&filtcountry=0&loctxt=&keywords=&orderxby=1&submit_pager=Filter+Search
5th Dec 2017 07:40 UTCPaul De Bondt Manager
If we put 3 POTD's on the front page, we have only one week to go.
Or do we need to select some pics who are not good enough to satisfie the demand.
Not a good idea I think.
5th Dec 2017 13:29 UTCOlivier Mével Expert
5th Dec 2017 13:46 UTCJohn Collins
I love this discussion/debate!
In my opinion, there are only a handful of sites that fall into the category of having a diverse list of different minerals: Clara Mine, Tsumeb Mine, Poudrette Quarry, etc. Many of their mineral members only occur in tiny quantities. (Cudos to Clara for making "wild" specimens available to collectors).
When viewing fist sized specimens from these or any other mine site, the possibility of seeing the magnificent fine crystal structures as seen in micromount photos is fleetingly remote due to extraction breakage etc.
As well, due to the formation processes, many of the delicate and beautiful fine crystal growths seen in these photos are microscopic in size with few exceptions.
I love showing my (macro) collection to my curious friends (there are not enough of them it seems
5th Dec 2017 20:37 UTCRalph S Bottrill 🌟 Manager
6th Dec 2017 06:20 UTCGeoff Van Horn Expert
6th Dec 2017 08:41 UTCHarjo Neutkens Manager
There is no bias whatsoever and the diversity of tastes represented within the management group warrants a diverse offer of POTDs as far as I'm concerned.
One important thing I would like to say about the POTD discussion: Come on folks, it's just a daily fun photo.
6th Dec 2017 09:26 UTCMario Pauwels
Best regards,
Mario Pauwels
6th Dec 2017 09:48 UTCAlfredo Petrov Manager
So, with 859,500 photos, and tens of thousands more coming every year, and the number of days in a year remaining (almost) constant, the vast vast majority of photos can never be POTD, regardless of how great they are. It's time for people to stop worrying about it. Or should Mindat perhaps have a "Photo of the Hour", so more of them get a chance?
6th Dec 2017 10:04 UTCPaul De Bondt Manager
So I think our estimated members don't upload the wrong pics.
6th Dec 2017 10:05 UTCMario Pauwels
Best regards,
Mario Pauwels
6th Dec 2017 10:18 UTCTimothy Greenland
I just enjoy looking at them. I sometimes learn things, and I am sometimes frustrated by the paucity of the mineralogical information given, but I enjoy the daily surprise...
Cheers
Tim
6th Dec 2017 12:54 UTCHarjo Neutkens Manager
Apart from that my friends, rest assure, I added a couple more to the POTD pool :-)
6th Dec 2017 13:43 UTCJohn Collins
I want to know about the geological processes that formed the specimen. I know others feel this way as well. Perhaps one of the selection criteria for the POTD might be the length of the text included with the mineral description followed by a visual check by a member of the selection committee.
Regards,
John
6th Dec 2017 15:27 UTCUwe Kolitsch Manager
> A suggestion for a fair competition ...
REMEMBER: This was never a competition and never intended so. Enjoy it and feel free to suggest POTD candidates (not your own, if possible).
6th Dec 2017 16:01 UTCOlivier Mével Expert
6th Dec 2017 21:21 UTCKevin Conroy Manager
It's interesting, rare (on Earth found only at the type locality), and ugly (for those who like such minerals...).
6th Dec 2017 22:36 UTCPavel Kartashov Manager
When I was a beginner on mindat, I was very surprised at the choice of my photos for POTD - they were not the best from simultaneusly uploaded photos of the same material. Compare for example https://www.mindat.org/photo-70974.html with https://www.mindat.org/photo-70975.html and https://www.mindat.org/photo-116677.html with https://www.mindat.org/photo-116676.html. It is quite clear which photos are better.
Now I am the editor myself and understand, that the editors are also people. Moreover, they are people so much, that I must repent - I removed from POTD queue by my own hand tens of microphotographs of the Italian anatases. Each of them was beautiful individually. But their total number exceeded all the limits of decency and common sense.
Therefore, I repeat, you should understand that the formation of a POTD queue is a dynamic process that comes from the interaction of the tastes and preferences of many people. The excesses of some editors are leveled by the activities of others. And the result is generally not so bad.
My advice to you, think less about this subject and happiness will be to you. As an editor, for example, I have the opportunity to know which photo will be tomorrow's POTD. But I very rarely take this opportunity. It is much more pleasant for me to receive every morning a small surprise. Sometimes I see my pictures as POTD. This is pleasant, because I am not photographer, and aesthetics with photo-skills aren't the main things in my pictures. I can only hope that people reading and my captions to them also. (What I do not see, unfortunately, in the views statistics of the most wiewed my picture - which was shown 8680 times, while key-sketch of phases position was only 722 times opened. :-( )
7th Dec 2017 01:01 UTCNorman King 🌟 Expert
So I won’t post any other photos that I took.
But I wanted to show that there should be plenty of photos that aren’t run-of-the-mill micros from Clara or anywhere else. Below is one more of mine, just because I think it is fun. I don’t know what the conversation was between these two people before I documented their activity, and that’s probably best. Yes, I did manage to sneak this into my gallery! It's the child of a serious photo, showing the local setting which cannot be determined from the parent. Sometimes you gotta lighten up.
7th Dec 2017 11:45 UTCHarjo Neutkens Manager
The choice of POTD can never be an exact science because taste just can't be measured and can't be quantified. Nor can it ever be a completely democratic process because we'd discuss for a year which photo should be the best choice for one day.
In this case there's an analogy with my job. I'm a classical musician and a professional artist by trade. As a musician I'm part of an orchestra under the baton of a conductor. The conductor makes choices and we as orchestral musicians make our own choices as well and by doing so we try to create music that the audience will appreciate. As a professional artist I make my choices in my studio and show my work in galleries and museums.
Every single visitor to the concerts where I play is entitled to their own judgement. One may or may not like the concert. The same goes for visitors in galleries or museums where I exhibit, one might like it or not.
In both cases there can be endless discussions about individual tastes but it'll only serve it's own purpose, the discussion, and nothing else.
Exactly the same applies to the choice of POTDs on Mindat. One might like the choice or not and that, well, is basically it.
Of course, one can discuss like we do here, but in my view such a discussion is quite pointless.
7th Dec 2017 17:19 UTCNorman King 🌟 Expert
Your analogy is a good one. Thanks to you folks at Mindat for doing that job. POTD may be the main attention-getter on the Mindat home page.
18th Jan 2018 13:40 UTCEddy Vervloet Manager
Can someone lift the ban on Clara please?
Just my two cents of course...
18th Jan 2018 13:55 UTCDebbie Woolf Manager
18th Jan 2018 15:11 UTCOlivier Mével Expert
18th Jan 2018 15:42 UTCDonald B Peck Expert
18th Jan 2018 16:05 UTCMatt Neuzil Expert
POTD are likely to interest some but not always everybody.
Sometimes I feel almost as those that take offense are those that do have some great photography. I'm sure there is no offense or nothing personal that more of those persons pictures are not featured. We still do appreciate those contributions very much!
18th Jan 2018 18:53 UTCEddy Vervloet Manager
18th Jan 2018 21:27 UTCDonald B Peck Expert
24th Feb 2018 14:44 UTCEddy Vervloet Manager
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: April 20, 2024 00:25:23
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: April 20, 2024 00:25:23
Sweet Home Mine, Mount Bross, Alma Mining District, Park County, Colorado, USA