Home PageMindat NewsThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusManagement TeamContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatSponsor a PageSponsored PagesTop Available PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
What is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthMineral PhotographyThe Elements and their MineralsGeological TimeMineral Evolution
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
StatisticsThe ElementsMember ListBooks & MagazinesMineral MuseumsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice Settings
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day Gallery
Agate formation theory
Posted by Larry Maltby
Larry Maltby April 26, 2017 11:54AMDuring September 10 – 13, 2005 a Symposium on Agate and Cryptocrystalline Quartz was held at the Green Center, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado.
The symposium was sponsored by Friends of Mineralogy, Colorado Chapter; Colorado School of Mines Geology Museum; and U.S. Geological Survey.
There were 33 professional papers presented by well-known researchers on various subjects related to theories on agate formation. Each of the presentations were summarized and compiled into a 144 page report providing a very readable account of agate formation theories currently under investigation.
Rock Currier was one of the presenters. Here is the link: http://friendsofmineralogycolorado.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/2005_FMCC_Agate_Symposium.pdf
Alfredo Petrov April 26, 2017 12:55PMI was at that symposium, Larry; it was most interesting. One researcher from Spain, Dr Enrique Merino, proposed that agates (at least those he'd studied from Rio Grande do Sul) had formed at red-hot temperatures when hot basalt flowed over mud puddles and incorporated them as steam-bubble-derived silica gel pods (at those high temperatures). So there was someone providing evidence that agate formed at temperatures around the melting point of basalt, and other researchers who showed evidence that agates essentially formed at room temperature. And I thought at the time, after 150 years of studying them, we still don't know for certain how they form. (Well, there are people who claim they know, but the evidence presented so far is not yet entirely convincing.)
Larry Maltby April 26, 2017 04:45PMThat must have been an interesting couple of days, Alfredo, having all of those guy’s in one room at the same time. I wonder if any arguments broke out. It seems sometimes that there is a competition to finally solve the problem. I started looking at Merino”s (Professor Emeritus, Geochemistry, Indiana University Bloomington) theories a couple of years ago and I have to admit that I struggle. As you point out he focuses on the amethyst geodes that are found on the Rio Grande do Sul border with Uruguay. These geodes are huge and represent a unique occurrence in the world yet he states in one of his papers “Both requirements point toward agate crystallization from a blob of silica gel (Wang & Merino, GCA 1990, AJS 1995), and precludes crystallization of agate (one with repetitive textures) from aqueous silica solutions at any T,P.” It is the word preclude that causes me to struggle.
I recently came across another professional paper “The genesis of the amethyst geodes at Artigas (Uruguay) and the paleohydrology of the Guaraní aquifer: structural, geochemical, oxygen, carbon, strontium isotope and fluid inclusion study, June 2010”.
The first time I accessed this paper I was able to read the entire work. Now I can only access the abstract. (see below)
“The amethyst-bearing geodes found in the flood basalts of the Arapey formation at Artigas (Uruguay) were formed as protogeodes by bubbles of CO2-rich basalt-derived fluids. The formation of the celadonite rim and the lining of the geodes by agate followed by quartz and amethyst were driven by the artesian water of the Guaraní aquifer percolating the basalts from below. The temperature of the amethyst formation is estimated from fluid inclusion data to be between 50° and 120°C. Oxygen stable isotope data suggest a crystallization temperature of calcite of about only 24°C. The actual wellhead temperature of the water produced from the Guaraní aquifer in the study area is around 29°C.”
Significantly different than Merino”s theory.
Coincidently Bill Coruda wrote a summary of this theory. I lean heavily toward Bill’s version.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/28/2017 10:43AM by Larry Maltby.
Larry Maltby April 27, 2017 04:21AMThanks Wayne,
Bill's summary can be down loaded from this site.
This provides an alternative to Merino”s theory that makes a lot more sense to me.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/27/2017 04:27AM by Larry Maltby.
Larry Maltby May 15, 2017 02:39PMThe hydrodynamics of bubble shape in viscous liquids reveals an important feature of the shape of amethyst cathedrals. As a gas bubble rises in a viscous liquid it assumes a bullet like shape with a concave bottom. As more gas bubbles coalesce the bubble increases in size and significantly grows in vertical length.
If you do a Google search on “amethyst cathedrals” and then click on images you will see many photos that show some version of the classic bullet shape.
The photo below shows an agate (5.0 x 3.8 cm) that I collected In-situ from the basalt of the Lake Shore Traps of Keweenaw County, Michigan. If you imagine the “bubble” prior to the deposition of the microcrystalline quartz, the vesicle has a classic bullet shape. From below another “bubble” is starting to coalesce and a connection to the larger bubble above had been established at the time that the lava froze sufficiently to stop the action. This does not appear to be the result of a steam explosion caused by the lava flowing over a puddle of water.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 06/02/2017 01:59PM by Larry Maltby.
Michael Harwell May 16, 2017 12:26AMgreat timing. I was pondering this yesterday. Perhaps this is an example. I found this at the beach. Nothing special. But, I Like to collect the ugly ones so I can compare and learn...maybe cut later down the road or make a stream? Anyway, I was pondering this last night. Was the banding vertical when in a liquid state? Making its way up? When I find them they usually lay flat or horizontal.
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 05/16/2017 12:58PM by Michael Harwell.
Daniel Bennett May 16, 2017 04:48PM"If you imagine the “bubble” prior to the deposition of the microcrystalline quartz, the vesicle has a classic bullet shape." is the bullet shape not proof that they occur together? how could there be a bubble prior to deposition of quartz? the silica gel must have been there to help create that bubble.
Larry Maltby May 17, 2017 01:50PM“how could there be a bubble prior to deposition of quartz? the silica gel must have been there to help create that bubble.”
Daniel, vesicles in basalt are caused by gases that are released in molten lava as the result of a significant reduction in pressure due to a volcanic eruption. If you do a Google search on the key words “vesicular basalt” and then click on images at the top of the page you will see many photos of basalt with empty vesicles. The presence of a silica gel is not required to produce a “bullet shaped” vesicle. The mineralization within these empty vesicles usually occurs after the lava solidifies including the deposition of quartz in the form of agate. The agate that you now see in a sample of basalt is the end result of a long sequence of processes occurring over geological time. They may include the crystallization of both macro quartz and micro quartz, color changes due to natural dying processes, the dissolution and recrystallization of the quartz, and the crystallization of various mineral inclusions.
See here for the variety of mineralization in vesicles all from a single locality.
Remember the statement that Alfredo made at the beginning of this thread. “And I thought at the time, after 150 years of studying them (agates), we still don't know for certain how they form.”
Daniel Bennett May 17, 2017 04:45PMthank you Larry. I realize theres no certainty about it which makes it fun to ponder...I didn't think we were looking at a bullet shaped vesicle in basalt I thought we were looking at a bullet shaped vesicle in agate...if so that should prove that the silica gel was present and viscous when that bullet shaped vesicle occurred. right?
Gregg Little May 17, 2017 07:15PMTo follow Larry's thread and his quote of Alfredo's, I'll add the following.
Often somewhat simple or "straight line" arguments are used for the geological processes based on the final form observed in a specimen, say an agate nodule. Agate, chalcedony or quartz is particularly complex as its formation can occur 1) in a wide range of temperatures, 2) at various pressures deep in a rock succession to as little as one atmosphere in surface deposits, 3) in most geological settings and, 4) over geologically instantaneous events to almost unfathomable long time periods. Other debates surround silica sources, crystallization sequences, closed and open systems, hydrothermal verses silica gel, episodic events, etc.
Although researchers are usually able to tease out most details on the first three points, they will grudgingly admit that inconclusive studies can suffer due to the time component. Both money and human resources are not able to duplicate this most critical element. Not often is it easy to demonstrate the sequence from extrusive event to the final specimen in hand as often intermediate steps of deposition, solution, replacement and re-crystallization, to name a few, occur.
Daniel Bennett May 17, 2017 08:39PMwell I reread Larry`s post from may 15. now I realize that he is talking the shape of the entire agate. but when I read it then I thought he was describing the vesicle inside the agate. which also has the same bullet shape.with that little tail pointing down...the vesicle in the agate has its own bullet shape in stead of really following the outermost banding of the agate itself which isn't really all that bullet shaped but the original vesicle may have been...I guess theres always at least two ways of interpreting things. Its a good picture for contemplating.
Gregg Little May 18, 2017 12:13AMThere is an very interesting aspect to the agate's void that Daniel is referring to in the picture seen in Larry's entry (Publication1.jpg). The silica gel deposition theory by Moxon has to account for an approximate volume loss of about 20% upon crystallization. The void plus the macro-crystalline clear quartz could be evidence of the 20% volume loss thus supporting the silica gel hypothesis of deposition.
Larry Maltby May 19, 2017 12:31PM“Was the banding vertical when in a liquid state?”
Michael, I assume that you are talking about the “chevron” pattern in the banding. Your sample looks like a vein deposit of high quality chalcedony. I don’t think that the pattern necessarily points upward. It is most likely just the pinching off of the pattern due to running out of space to form.
Larry Maltby May 19, 2017 04:35PM“That's also an interesting idea of geodes forming from puddles being covered with lava.”
Geologists have studied this subject and have provided some interesting information. Based on a wide variety of conditions the hot lava reacts with the water and a steam explosion occurs at the contact with the wet substrate at the bottom of the flow. Evidence of the explosion into the lava can be seen in the basalt after the lava solidifies. The formations are called “spiracles”.
In the U.S. one of the best places to see spiracles in basalt is in the massive flows of the Columbia River Basalt Group in Washington State. Here is a photo from a paper on hydrology produced by the State of Washington.
Ref, T. Tolan et-al, 2009, Hydrology of the Columbia River Basalt Aquifer System, Columbia Basin Ground Water Management, State of Washington.
The spiracle is full of explosive debris including Hyaloclastite, a tuff like breccia rich in black volcanic glass. In this case there are no open vugs or vesicles.
Below is a drawing shown in another professional paper.
Ref, A. C. Waters, 1960, Determining Direction of Flow in Basalts, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
The top drawing (a.) shows a large open spiracle with corrugations caused by the molten lave trying to collapse into the space but being held back by the pressure of the steam in the vug. The lower drawing (c.) shows a large spiracle filled with pillow basalt due to a larger amount of available water.
None of these examples indicate the presence of silica gel, agate or any other secondary deposits.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/19/2017 04:50PM by Larry Maltby.
Gregg Little May 20, 2017 07:35PMOne of the more bizarre examples of this spiracle formation, along with associated pillow lava and vessicle tubes is found at the Blue Lake Rhino site in Washington State. Here the water supply was the rhino's body as well as the surrounding environment.
Ralph Bottrill May 20, 2017 10:46PMI have seen these spiracles filled with zeolites and calcite, along with amygdules of the same. Another argument against agates forming as molten silica balls, it's hard to do that with calcite and zeolites.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/20/2017 11:02PM by Ralph Bottrill.
Gregg Little May 21, 2017 05:41PMI am not one to accept a blanket theory of formation, especially for as complex a mineral as quartz. The theory of hydrated hot silica gel balls are conceivably quartz formation under a very specific set of conditions; confining pressure, temperature, amount of available water, rate of cooling, localized relatively open or closed system for the amygdule, etc. The examples in this thread support the possibility of both theories existing without contradictions.
Larry Maltby May 22, 2017 06:36PMI agree, Gregg, it is always a good idea to keep an open mind. As we have said before, just about the time that we think that we understand a mineralogical or geological principal, a specimen shows up that blows the idea out of the water. However, regarding the comparison of two diverse agate formation theories, I have in the past made judgments based on probability.
One theory is based on the idea that agate forms as a secondary deposit. This is the conventional theory and is based on a large body of evidence and also fits the observations that I have personally made during field collecting. If you consider that agate forms in vesicles in basalt, in sediments, in veins, in wood, in bone, in casts of wood, in casts of fossils, as replacements in other minerals, this theory is highly probable.
The other theory put forth by Merino is that agate forms as a primary constituent of basalt crystalizing in unison with the basalt. Below is a brief quote from his paper.
“The basalt flow stops moving and starts cooling down. As the 1000-degree isotherm sweeps inward through the flow, the basalt crystallizes fast. Each glob of silica gel, as a closed system, quickly crystallizes into an agate too, just as fast as the surrounding basalt, and at a similar, very high temperature.”
This would be a very easy theory to prove but I have spent many hours looking for verification to no avail. It seems to me that all that would be required, would be for a researcher to go to a recent flow less than a year old and find fully developed agates in recent basalt. I have never found a reference like this. For this reason it seems to me that Merino’s theory has very low probability to have occurred in nature. On the other hand if fully developed agates were found in year old (or less) basalt the theory would have more credibility.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 05/23/2017 03:27AM by Larry Maltby.
Uwe Kolitsch May 23, 2017 07:58AMRecommended reading:
Numerical simulations of amethyst geode cavity formation by ballooning of altered Paraná volcanic rocks, South America
L. A. HARTMANN, J. T. N. MEDEIROS and L. T. PETRUZZELLIS
Journal: Geofluids, 2012, Volume 12, Number 2, Page 133
Numerical modelling by finite element methods provides two significant insights into the formation of the giant amethyst geodes of the Paraná volcanic province: the conditions needed to open the cavities and the conditions that control their size and shape. Giant amethyst geodes were formed in the Cretaceous (135 Ma) in altered volcanic rocks by water vapour pressure (Δp) at about 0.5 MPa under an altered basalt cover of 5–20 m. Only rocks with Young’s modulus values (E) in the range 1–2 GPa can sustain ballooning, which is the growth of a cavity in a ductile medium by the pressure of water and its vapour. The size of the proto-geode is dependent on the water vapour pressure, which is directly related to thickness of the overlying basalt. Varying the yield points causes the formation of either prolate or oblate cavities. A low transition point (smaller than 0.18 MPa) generates a prolate-shaped cavity, whereas a high transition point (larger than 0.18 MPa) generates oblate proto-geodes. Proto-geodes are smaller when Young’s modulus is higher (rock is less altered) or when water vapour pressure is lower (because of thinner overburden of basalt). The calculations are an indication that the processes operative in the altered basalts led to the opening of giant cavities by ballooning.
Stable isotope and mineralogical investigation of the genesis of amethyst geodes in the Los Catalanes gemological district, Uruguay, southernmost Paraná volcanic province
Lauren C. Duarte, Leo A. Hartmann, Luiz H. Ronchi, Zsolt Berner, Thomas Theye and Hans J. Massonne
Journal: Mineralium Deposita, 2011, Volume 46, Number 3, Page 239
Stable isotopes (C, O, S) and mineralogical studies of the world-class amethyst-geode deposits of the Los Catalanes gemological district, Uruguay, constrain processes operative during mineral deposition. The mineralized basaltic andesites from the Cretaceous Paraná volcanic province are intensely altered to zeolites (clinoptilolite) and clay minerals. Variations in the δ18O values of silica minerals in geodes (chalcedony, quartz, and amethyst) are much larger and the values generally somewhat lower (21.2–31.5‰) in the Uruguayan deposits than in the Ametista do Sul area of southern Brazil. The range of δ34S values (−15.0 to −0.3‰) of altered basaltic rocks requires (in addition to sulfur of magmatic origin) the involvement of 34S-depleted sedimentary sulfur from bacterial sulfate reduction. The results delimit the mineralizing processes to a post-eruption environment characterized by low temperature and strong interaction of the lava flows with meteoric water.
Sequential opening and filling of cavities forming vesicles, amygdales and giant amethyst geodes in lavas from the southern Paraná volcanic province, Brazil and Uruguay
Léo Afraneo Hartmann, Lauren da Cunha Duarte, Hans-Joachim Massonne, Cassiana Michelin, Leonardo Manara Rosenstengel, Magda Bergmann, Thomas Theye, Juliana Pertille, Karine Rosa Arena, Sandro Kucera Duarte, Viter Magalhães Pinto, Eduardo Guimarães Barboza, Maria Luiza C.C. Rosa and Wilson Wildner
Journal: International Geology Review, 2012, Volume 54, Number 1, Page 1
The opening and filling of cavities in rocks are the major processes related to the generation and sealing of porosity in ore deposits. This study documents three stages of opening and filling of vesicles and geodes in the basalts and rhyodacites of the southern Paraná volcanic province. Each step detailed here is actually part of a sequence of minor hydrothermal events. First, lava degassing at high temperature (1150°C) formed small (<4 cm) vesicles in the crusts of flow units. In sequence, these vesicles were partly to fully filled at low temperature (30–150°C) by hydrothermal minerals, particularly clays and zeolites; this process also sealed the porosity of the lava. Second, the injection of fluidized sand generated new cavities, which were partly filled with sand; the newly formed porosity was sealed by the low-temperature fluid. Third, intense alteration of the basalt or rhyodacite core into a claystone favoured the opening of small to giant protogeodes (0.1 mm to 4 m) by dissolution; cooling of the fluid led to the precipitation of hydrothermal minerals, particularly the spectacular amethyst, calcite, and gypsum-bearing geodes.
Controls on prolate and oblate geode geometries in the Veia Alta basalt flow, largest world producer of amethyst, Paraná volcanic province, Brazil
L.A. Hartmann, J.T.N. Medeiros, S.B. Baggio and L.M. Antunes
Journal: Ore Geology Reviews, 2015, Volume 66, Page 243
Variable intensity of hydrothermal alteration of the Veia Alta basalt flow, Ametista do Sul, Brazil, exerted the fundamental control on the shape and size of the amethyst geodes. The loss on ignition (LOI) of the host basalt is used as a proxy for intensity of alteration and has direct relationship with the height of the geodes (up to 150 cm in the three study mines) and with the prolaticity of geodes. All rocks with LOI > 5 wt.% host prolate geodes and all oblate geodes are hosted in rocks with LOI < 5 wt.%. An additional observation is the extensive mobility of several elements during hydrothermal alteration (variable LOI), including SiO2, K2O and Rb. The hydrothermal origin of the geodic cavities is thus established and their shapes explained by the empirical observation of the results from a previous numerical simulation experiment.
Gregg Little May 23, 2017 05:35PMGreetings Larry and Uwe;
Much as yourselves, I favour the hydrothermal theory of the formation of agate, chalcedony and quartz associated with volcanogenic terrain but research argues that it is far from established as the only theory. I would recommend reviewing an excellent summary which for even the less scientifically incline who follow this blog would find informative; Agates: a literature review and Electron Backscatter Diffraction study of Lake Superior agates, Timothy J. Beaster Senior Integrative Exercise March 9, 2005, Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Bachelor of Arts degree from Carleton College, Northfield, Minnesota.
A brief of the Summary section is that there is much research supporting multiple theories. This situation has resulted from many authors' research into the various silica sources, the methods of agate deposition in the amygdule, the range of formation temperatures and the significance of age on agates. Although the structure of agate has been well researched, as of this 2005 review, the replication of agate-like pattern generation in the laboratory has eluded researchers resulting in further inconclusiveness.
The amethyst geode cavity formation by ballooning of altered Paraná volcanic rocks, in South America is a very interesting and specific case that supports the hydrothermal depositional theory. Although impressive, this unique deposit should not be extrapolated to explaining all agate deposition but rather clearly demonstrating a hydrothermal mechanism in this setting.
Larry Maltby May 24, 2017 03:25PMUwe,
Thanks for the information. I was able to obtain the complete paper on your first reference about the ballooning of vesicles in altered basalt. It is especially interesting to me because I have collected extensively in soft, altered or decomposing basalt containing agate nodules up to 20 cm in length and this paper gives me some insight into the possible physical properties of the matrix. I am just starting to dig into this and will likely have more comments later.
Another point of interest is that I worked for about 40 years designing sheet metal panels and structures in the auto industry. We used finite element analysis extensively in this process and now I find out that this science was also used to investigate the ballooning of vesicles in basalt.
Alfred L. Ostrander May 24, 2017 07:18PMUwe, thanks for the references.
Several recent articles I have found on the amethyst geodes in the Serra Geral flood basalts near Ametista do Sul present a two stage process for the geodes. The proto-geode cavities formed during cooling with dates averaging out to about 135 Ma. This would include the ballooning mentioned previously.
The second stage was the formation of the geodes themselves. That is considered to be from mineralized meteoric waters. The sources for the mineralization are considered to be the interstitial glass fractions of the basalts and possibly also from the underlying arenaceous Botucato sandstones. It seems this is mostly hydrothermal waters rising from an aquifer in the Botucato sandstones. Formation of the geodes appears to be dated from 65 Ma to about 80 Ma. That is quite a gap in time from the original basalt flows but those are the figures presented. Keeping track of hydrothermal events through this extended period of time has been a bit of a problem only in that I am trying to put together as coherent a time line as I can.
I found a lot of this information just googling Brazilian agate formation. Still lots of reading to do especially in regards to the tectonic movement and shifting environmental factors up to the period of time about 70Ma when the geodes were forming.
Just an interesting note: These flood basalts are considered to be related to the Walvis hot spot appearing about 135 Ma. Of course, this was the beginning of rifting between Africa and South America. Part of the Serra Geral lavas are still sitting along the African margin. In Namibia they are referred to as the Etendeka flood basalts. The combined basalts of the Parana Flood Basalt Province are thought to be the largest in the world.
Gregg Little May 26, 2017 01:25PMAlfred; You wrote "That is quite a gap in time from the original basalt flows but those are the figures presented. Keeping track of hydrothermal events through this extended period of time has been a bit of a problem only in that I am trying to put together as coherent a time line as I can."
Are you trying to equate tectonic events to the periods of hydrothermal activity for the quartz mineralization? I was poking around the literature and the opening of the South Atlantic was episodic both in time and spatially (fixed North African block causing opening from both the north and south ends of the South Atlantic rift zone). I am not sure if there were "failed" subduction zones during early rifting adjacent to the Parana Basin as this could be a possible heat source to drive the hydrothermal plumbing that caused the later mineralization. Early rifting predates the mineralization but much tectonic activity and vulcanism extends well into the late Cretaceous (100 to 65.5 mya).
Daniel Bennett July 23, 2017 05:50PMi had brought this up in an earlier less appropriate topic. but I still am not sure what to make of it. this time I cut an amygdaloidal piece of basalt for a better picture. its puzzling to me why some vesicles are empty some are partially filled and some are completely filled. when I look at it and imagine that its still liquid it looks like gas bubbles and water drops side by side and in some cases they have merged together causing partial fillings. I want to acknowledge the dubious none scientific nature of this inquiry. I know its debatable and I don't want to start a major debate.im just curious what the other explanations might be.
Ralph Bottrill July 24, 2017 12:13PMIn zeolitised vesicular basalts, it's quite typical to get highly varied mineral assemblages in adjacent vesicles. Some I have seen have vesicles that can contain just natrolite, others only analcime, some filled with smectite and some have calcite, all within a few square cm. l presume it must have something to do with changes in the fluid chemistry and temperature over time, with the permeability also varying with micro cracks constantly forming and revealing by filling with secondary minerals. The second image suggests the previous presence of a calcite botryoid, not uncommon in these assemblages.
Daniel Bennett July 24, 2017 09:39PMRalph I appreciate your feedback. I suppose a microscope would be necessary to see these micro cracks. have you ever seen these kind of cracks in a thin slice? is it obvious that filled vesicles have cracks leading to them and the empty ones don't?
Paul Brandes July 25, 2017 12:55AMAgree Ralph.
The vesicular basalts of the Keweenaw Peninsula in Michigan are an education in paragenetic sequences when it comes to mineral assemblages. In the Keweenaw, there were at least three different stages of mineralisation, each with their own chemistry which produced many different minerals, including the famous native copper deposits we see today.
David Baldwin July 26, 2017 08:00PMInteresting reading. I picked this up on my local beach, and it originates from a Cretaceous chert formation. The void in the chert was most likely there due to a fossilised echinoid. I have found quartz crystals up to 1cm and botryoidal chalcedony before in chert but never anything resembling agate.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2018, except where stated. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2018, except where stated. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters.