Donate now to keep mindat.org alive!Help mindat.org|Log In|Register|
Home PageMindat NewsThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusManagement TeamContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatSponsor a PageSponsored PagesTop Available PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
The most common minerals on earthMineral PhotographyThe Elements and their Minerals
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralSearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
StatisticsThe ElementsMember ListBooks & MagazinesMineral MuseumsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice Settings
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day Gallery
bannerbannerbannerbannerbannerbanner

Pending approval

Posted by Cindy Hasler  
avatar
Cindy Hasler August 10, 2017 03:25AM
Hello
Just wondering how long does it take to get a picture approved
avatar
Don Windeler August 10, 2017 07:01AM
Cindy:

I am a regular, non-manager user. My experience is that the vast majority of my photos have been approved between crazy quick (a few hours) out to a week, with the norm being a day or two. As I understand it, different managers have varying geographic remits, so you can periodically get a longer delay if the main approver for your region is off duty away from MinDat for a bit. Sometimes things may also take longer if you have something potentially controversial or of uncertain ID.

And one should always expect a delay after major shows like Tucson, as everyone and their brother is heaving photos of their new favorite children into an approval traffic jam.

All of this is done by volunteers, so I try stay mellow when I upload something -- though I'll confess to to checking my "newest photos" way more than I should once I've crammed it all into the system! (And a big thanks to all those taking care of the approval process.)

Cheers,
D.
avatar
Keith Compton August 10, 2017 07:08AM
Hi Cindy

I note that someone (not me) has questioned the identity of your three prasiolite photos, hence the delay.

Certainly from my perspective they just look like quartz.

Cheers

Keith
avatar
Paul De Bondt August 10, 2017 10:10AM
Cindy, your specimens are not prasiolite.
This is prasiolite : https://www.mindat.org/gallery.php?min=40112 and is way from what you have uploaded.
Please change the " prasiolite " in quartz and they will get through.

Cheers.

Paul.
avatar
Cindy Hasler August 10, 2017 10:32AM



Good morning, I read the description of prasiolite and it said green Quartz. Isn't this green?
Thanks
avatar
Wayne Corwin August 10, 2017 11:00AM
why is the photo labled amethyst_6310.jpg ?
that may cause confusion, if it's supposed to be prasiolite.
avatar
Cindy Hasler August 10, 2017 11:06AM
Hi
Just a file name
The specimens are from a amethyst deposit
avatar
Jolyon & Katya Ralph August 10, 2017 11:07AM
I personally don't see any problem with this being labelled 'prasiolite'. As Cindy states this is green (nice association with the amethystine colours too).


Yes, it's quartz. But if we're going to allow varietal names such as 'amethyst', 'smoky quartz' etc on mindat then I see no reason to prevent this being called 'prasiolite'.

If this isn't prasiolite then we need a much clearer definition of what prasiolite is on the prasiolite page.
avatar
Jolyon & Katya Ralph August 10, 2017 11:10AM
Note that this one https://www.mindat.org/photo-836353.html can't be described as 'prasiolite', but the other two photos can.
avatar
Peter Nancarrow August 10, 2017 11:48AM
It isn't clear in the photo above [https://www.mindat.org/forum.php?addon,6,module=embed_images,file_id=71551] whether the specimen is really green coloured quartz (i.e. can therfore be called 'prasiolite'), or is simply quartz which appears coloured in part due to having green inclusions or some green mineral showing through from behind it. If it is the latter it should not be termed prasiolite.

Pete N.
avatar
Paul De Bondt August 10, 2017 11:49AM
Dangerous statement Jolyon.
What if somebody call a chlorite or hedenbergite included quartz, prasiolite ?
avatar
Jolyon & Katya Ralph August 10, 2017 11:58AM
As I said before

> If this isn't prasiolite then we need a much clearer definition of what prasiolite is on the prasiolite page.


And this is associated with amethyst, which gives some good confidence that it is a true 'prasiolite' and not included with chlorite or whatever
avatar
Keith Compton August 10, 2017 12:00PM
Hi

I note that in the Canadian Mineralogist (46, 111-124) "An Investigation of Greenish Quartz found at the Thunder Bay Amethyst Mine Panorama, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada, and Similar Localities" by Laura B, HEBERT and George R. ROSSMAN that they discuss the occurrence of greenish Quartz. They don't call it Prasiolite.

However, given that Prasiolite is a term for green quartz, I guess the two specimens qualify.

I note also that according to the geology.com website Prasiolite is heat treated Amethyst.
"A small number of amethyst deposits contain material that turns a yellowish green to green color at about 500 degrees Celsius."

I'm forever learning !!

Cheers

Keith
avatar
Cindy Hasler August 10, 2017 12:16PM


Hi
Here is another photo of the one that is not approved. Looks green but with a coating
avatar
Alfredo Petrov August 10, 2017 12:39PM
The classic "Prasiolite" from the Kaczawskie mountains, Poland, is more of a "greenish brown" than a "green".
avatar
Jolyon & Katya Ralph August 10, 2017 12:41PM
That's indeed true. But what is the coloring agent in that, and how does that compare to this green quartz? I believe it's the same, ie Fe2+ from the sequence Fe2+ = prasiolite, Fe3+ = citrine, Fe4+ = amethyst

very very simplified of course.
avatar
Uwe Kolitsch August 10, 2017 12:50PM
"Looks green but with a coating"
Green??
avatar
Jolyon & Katya Ralph August 10, 2017 12:54PM
Yes, if it is green then the photos don't do it justice, and would therefore be miseading to post the photo as an example of prasiolite here, which is why it will not get approved under that name.

The other two were much clearer
avatar
David Von Bargen August 10, 2017 12:58PM
If you read the two articles (by Nassau and Lameiras) , it appears that the green color is caused by unpaired free electrons and not Fe (although the Fe has an effect on creating the free electrons).
https://www.mindat.org/min-40112.html
Nassau seems to think that green quartz (at least from Brazil) is distinct from the "greened" amethyst.
avatar
Cindy Hasler August 10, 2017 05:33PM
Hello
Just wondering why the 2 specimens that were approved as prasiolite have been removed from the prasiolite page
avatar
Amir C. Akhavan August 12, 2017 08:56AM
Removal reverted. One photo now featured on prasiolite page.
avatar
Cindy Hasler August 12, 2017 09:59PM
Thank you
avatar
Cindy Hasler August 12, 2017 10:18PM


Crown jewel mine
Thunder Bay, Ontario
avatar
John Montgomery August 12, 2017 11:32PM
Wow Cindy... that's cool and sure looks green!
Regards to Bram
avatar
Costas Constantinides August 13, 2017 12:15AM
Have dug for quartz in the N.T. Australia .The surface material was a light sea green.A little deeper it was dual coloured ie green and purple..Deeper still it was the amethyst colour. Where does this fit into the Fe2/Fe3 scheme. It seems in this case the sun/heat exposure had an effect on the colour. The green colour is the same as most of the material photographed and called prasiolite in this discussion.?????




Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/13/2017 12:26AM by Costas Constantinides.
avatar
Ralph Bottrill August 14, 2017 02:15AM
Hi Costas
I have seen a similar effect in amethyst from near Broken Hill, but a thin section suggested the green colour of bleached material may be due to numerous extremely fine inclusions of micaceous minerals.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login



bannerbannerbannerbannerbannerbanner
Mineral and/or Locality  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2017, except where stated. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us Current server date and time: December 12, 2017 00:35:12
Go to top of page