Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Predictive Mineralogy

Possible unrecorded species at Dean Mine (Cumberland mine), Lewis Mining District, Lander County, Nevada, USA

This table is based on statistical analysis of other localities containing similar species to the ones found at this locality.

Possible missing speciesFormulaMatch %Due to recorded presence of
AcanthiteAg2S99.99%Aguilarite (68.81 %), Canfieldite (64.76 %), Freieslebenite (53.66 %), Hocartite (51.43 %), Miargyrite (53.30 %), Polybasite (60.65 %), Pyrargyrite (50.61 %), Pyrostilpnite (64.58 %), Stephanite (58.82 %), Uytenbogaardtite (71.21 %)
StanniteCu2FeSnS496.40%Canfieldite (58.10 %), Hocartite (74.29 %), Rhodostannite (66.67 %)
PyrrhotiteFe1-xS85.14%Canfieldite (62.86 %), Hocartite (60.00 %)
MarcasiteFeS282.85%Hocartite (57.14 %), Rhodostannite (60.00 %)
MuscoviteKAl2(AlSi3O10)(OH)278.08%Canfieldite (53.33 %), Uytenbogaardtite (53.03 %)
GypsumCaSO4 Β· 2H2O64.17%Rhomboclase (64.18 %)
CoquimbiteAlFe3(SO4)6(H2O)12 Β· 6H2O56.71%Rhomboclase (56.72 %)
FranckeiteFe2+(Pb,Sn2+)6Sn4+2Sb2S1453.33%Rhodostannite (53.33 %)
SideriteFeCO351.42%Hocartite (51.43 %)
JarositeKFe3+3(SO4)2(OH)650.74%Rhomboclase (50.75 %)

Key: Mineral matches key element mineralogy of deposit Key element(s) in mineral not listed for deposit (-20% score)


Predicting paragenetic modes of deposit

Green indicates almost certain match based on minerals unique to a certain deposit type. Yellow indicates a possibly poor match, but should not be entirely discounted. Scores > 100 indicate strong confidence.

Paragenetic ModeScore
33 : Minerals deposited by hydrothermal metal-rich fluids (see also [#12])

Unique: Aguilarite, Boulangerite, Canfieldite, Clausthalite, Miargyrite, Owyheeite, etc.
1,120
12 : Hadean hydrothermal subsurface sulfide deposits (see also #33)

Unique: Hocartite
100
47h : Low-𝑇 subaerial oxidative hydration, weathering (see also #16 and #23) - [Near-surface oxidized, dehydrated minerals]13
26 : Hadean detrital minerals13
14 : Hot springs, geysers, and other subaerial geothermal minerals13
47d : Low-𝑇 subaerial oxidative hydration, weathering (see also #16 and #23) - [Arsenates, antimonates, selenates, bismuthinates]12
37 : Layered igneous intrusions and related PGE minerals2
54 : Coal and other mine fire minerals (see also #51 and #56)2
50 : Coal and/or oil shale minerals2
38 : Ophiolites2
36 : Carbonatites, kimberlites, and related igneous rocks2
7 : Ultramafic igneous rocks1