UM1991-04-AsS:CoFeNi
A material that is NOT an approved mineral species
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Formula:
(Co,Ni,Fe,Cu)AsS
Probably the Co analogue of UM1989-01-AsS:CoFeNi.
Occurs as tabular and xenomorphic grains, 1-6 microns in diameter, within chalcopyrite, intergrown with tennantite.
Chemically distinct from gersdorffite, but it's not sure if it is also distinct from cobaltite, alloclasite, and glaucodot.
Occurs as tabular and xenomorphic grains, 1-6 microns in diameter, within chalcopyrite, intergrown with tennantite.
Chemically distinct from gersdorffite, but it's not sure if it is also distinct from cobaltite, alloclasite, and glaucodot.
Unique Identifiers
Mindat ID:
52050
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:52050:0
GUID
(UUID V4):
(UUID V4):
269a2e2c-99e2-4552-bae3-6e90db99218f
Chemistry of UM1991-04-AsS:CoFeNi
Mindat Formula:
(Co,Ni,Fe,Cu)AsS
Other Information
Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.
Internet Links for UM1991-04-AsS:CoFeNi
mindat.org URL:
https://www.mindat.org/min-52050.html
Please feel free to link to this page.
Please feel free to link to this page.
Search Engines:
Mineral Dealers:
References for UM1991-04-AsS:CoFeNi
Reference List:
Localities for UM1991-04-AsS:CoFeNi
Locality List
- This locality has map coordinates listed.
- This locality has estimated coordinates.
ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence.
? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality.
- Good crystals or important locality for species.
- World class for species or very significant.
(TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species.
(FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties).
Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality.
Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).
All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
Kazakhstan | |
| Gertsen et al. (1991) +1 other reference |