Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography
╳Discussions
💬 Home🔎 Search📅 LatestGroups
EducationOpen discussion area.Fakes & FraudsOpen discussion area.Field CollectingOpen discussion area.FossilsOpen discussion area.Gems and GemologyOpen discussion area.GeneralOpen discussion area.How to ContributeOpen discussion area.Identity HelpOpen discussion area.Improving Mindat.orgOpen discussion area.LocalitiesOpen discussion area.Lost and Stolen SpecimensOpen discussion area.MarketplaceOpen discussion area.MeteoritesOpen discussion area.Mindat ProductsOpen discussion area.Mineral ExchangesOpen discussion area.Mineral PhotographyOpen discussion area.Mineral ShowsOpen discussion area.Mineralogical ClassificationOpen discussion area.Mineralogy CourseOpen discussion area.MineralsOpen discussion area.Minerals and MuseumsOpen discussion area.PhotosOpen discussion area.Techniques for CollectorsOpen discussion area.The Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryOpen discussion area.UV MineralsOpen discussion area.Recent Images in Discussions
Identity HelpHelp with synthetic
19th Jun 2012 02:04 UTCJohn Lichtenberger
Hardness is in the 5 to 6 range... (CZ is 8-8.5 Mohs)
Relative Density is 6.22 - 6.24 (no less, multiple measurements) (CZ is 5.6-6.0
Melting point is ~ 1000 C, roughly red heat (melts at the inner cone of butane mini-torch) to a glassy blob
(CZ is much much higher)
Looks alot like CZ but somewhat less dispersive
Stone is transparent yellow-green, with a yellowish orange flourescence from a LW laser pen
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y62/auplater/fluorite.jpg
trying to find something else with these properties is somewhat daunting (don't have a refractometer, although I may buy one, or maybe make one)
...but the RI may be too high for a standard tool...
Doubt that it's something exotic, as we got a bunch of it from an estate... but who knows?? maybe one of the syn garnets??
any help appreciated..
John L.
19th Jun 2012 02:46 UTCRonald John Gyllenhammer Expert
Not to many possibilities here I think. Wild guesses would include some synthetic similar to Scheelite or maybe some Microlite group species. When you find out for sure, let us know. Interesting.
Ron
19th Jun 2012 02:56 UTCRonald John Gyllenhammer Expert
I forgot to ask if you're confident that it is a synthetic for sure.
Ron
19th Jun 2012 04:43 UTCSteve Hardinger 🌟 Expert
19th Jun 2012 05:28 UTCStephanie Martin
edit - RI of leaded glass approx 1.7, less than cz
density can be as high as approx 6, a little under what your calc obtained but close
hardness around 6
working temp up to 1100
Interesting mystery!
regards,
stephanie :-)
19th Jun 2012 08:44 UTCRock Currier Expert
Do you have a polariscope? Is it isotropic or not. If not, can you resolve a uniaxial or biaxial figure?
19th Jun 2012 09:17 UTCBart Cannon
Rather than continuing the cogitation on this matter, please just send me one that I can keep, and I will provide an x-ray spectrum at no cost other than the stone..
I collect synthetic minerals and sometimes use them in my electron probe reference standard business.
Bart Cannon'
Cannon Microprobe
1041 NE 100th Street
Seattle, WA 98125
19th Jun 2012 14:12 UTCOwen Lewis
GGG is cubic and there is no other cubic and transparent gem crystal anywhere near John's SG. GGG will test as such using just a laptop screen and a pair of Polaroid specs, if John does not have a polariscope.
Scheelite is tetragonal and thus doubly refractive. There is sufficient birefringence for John to see doubling of the back facets under a loupe and with the cut specimen he has. Scheelite A/S in a synthetic specimen should be diagnostic.
Insh'Allah, that does it.
19th Jun 2012 22:58 UTCJohn Lichtenberger
-------------------------------------------------------
> John,
>
> Rather than continuing the cogitation on this
> matter, please just send me one that I can keep,
> and I will provide an x-ray spectrum at no cost
> other than the stone..
>
> I collect synthetic minerals and sometimes use
> them in my electron probe reference standard
> business.
>
> Bart Cannon'
> Cannon Microprobe
> 1041 NE 100th Street
> Seattle, WA 98125
That's generous of you Bart. Is a 4.3 gram chip enough of a sample??
Don't think it's GGG, as the RD is too low (6.21-6.23 vs. 7.02-7.09), as is the melting point...
Just measured a 125 carat CRB doorknob and it too measures 6.23 gm/cc... did a reality check on known CZ... 5.9 gm/cc by same method
John L.
19th Jun 2012 23:04 UTCEvan Johnson
EMJ
19th Jun 2012 23:17 UTCStephanie Martin
20th Jun 2012 00:12 UTCOwen Lewis
-------------------------------------------------------
> Some values also correspond to synthetic strontium
> titanate.
> EMJ
I though about it, but John says that the dispersion (fire) is less than CZ. just in the hand and under a strong light the fire in a cut Strontium Titanate should be seen as much greater than any CZ. Here's an example.
Secondly, the SG of Strontium Titanate is way off from John's measurement and its reported boundaries are tighter then most (+/- 0.02); CZ is closer. Thirdly. if John has been melting bits in a flame, he should have picked up the distinctive Strontrium flame colouration.
Of all the forms of testing, I think that scratch testing against Mohs's scale is the one most likely to give a poor result (assuming a good balance and hydrostatic weighing rig were used).
Do you have a pic of the rough, John?
20th Jun 2012 01:15 UTCBart Cannon
A 4.3 gram sample is adequate.
Typical Strontium Titanate is colorless.
Bart
20th Jun 2012 01:38 UTCJohn Lichtenberger
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y62/auplater/unk01.jpg
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y62/auplater/unk02.jpg
Large faceted doorknob at 12 o'clock is 125 carats, partially cut at 9 o'clock... just another BIG doorknob partly cut... (greenish hue due to dop wax), piece at lower center maybe 60 carats or so, shaped like a boule...
here is the cut stone and Barts chip in natural and fluorescent (LW) (bluish color in chip due to lighting, not fluorescence... cut stone shows orang-ish fluorescence due to internal reflections)
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y62/auplater/IMG_0968.jpg
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y62/auplater/IMG_0967.jpg
Strontium Titanate it isn't... the whole purpose of the flame was to test for strontium, no flame colors at all, but then I said, what the heck, let's see if it melts or decrepitates....melted like glass at red-orange heat...probably in the 1000C to 1400C range at most.
20th Jun 2012 03:15 UTCOwen Lewis
But, as we know, guessing from a pic and partial info may be fun but it's still guessing. Viewing in person and testing with calibrated instruments is the one way to certainty.
......I just checked the melting point of GGG. 1725 deg C Too hot for John's hand-held melting :-(
..... And just came across a paper suggesting that the MP for Scheelite mixed crystals with RE, produced for lasering are in the range 690 - 1100 deg C. http://arxiv.org/pdf/0902.1413.pdf
Better! If it is a mixed Scheelite crystal then the other characteristic properties (SG, dispersion etc, may vary substantially from those for pure Scheelite. etc). It begins to sound as though Bart's XRDF may really show us its paces :-)
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: April 26, 2024 03:16:58
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: April 26, 2024 03:16:58