Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography
╳Discussions
💬 Home🔎 Search📅 LatestGroups
EducationOpen discussion area.Fakes & FraudsOpen discussion area.Field CollectingOpen discussion area.FossilsOpen discussion area.Gems and GemologyOpen discussion area.GeneralOpen discussion area.How to ContributeOpen discussion area.Identity HelpOpen discussion area.Improving Mindat.orgOpen discussion area.LocalitiesOpen discussion area.Lost and Stolen SpecimensOpen discussion area.MarketplaceOpen discussion area.MeteoritesOpen discussion area.Mindat ProductsOpen discussion area.Mineral ExchangesOpen discussion area.Mineral PhotographyOpen discussion area.Mineral ShowsOpen discussion area.Mineralogical ClassificationOpen discussion area.Mineralogy CourseOpen discussion area.MineralsOpen discussion area.Minerals and MuseumsOpen discussion area.PhotosOpen discussion area.Techniques for CollectorsOpen discussion area.The Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryOpen discussion area.UV MineralsOpen discussion area.Recent Images in Discussions
Techniques for CollectorsA Challenge for the Chemists: removing fluorite as a soluble
22nd Feb 2008 20:32 UTCMorion
Physical removel of this coating is not a solution; maintaining the quality of the specimens is the objective.
Anyone with a sound understanding of this issue have a soloution to propose that can be implemented without lab?
I understand that there may not be a solution without an adequate and safe lab, but expendable specimens can be provided to a lab for any chemist with sincere interest.
Thank you in adavance,
Morion
23rd Feb 2008 20:29 UTCGeorg Graf
one can solute the fluorite with sulfuric acid, 50 %. But the generated HF can attac the Quartz. Because of this it is necessary to let always fresh sulfuric acid run over Your specimen. So You need much sulfuric acid. - That this treatment is quite dangerous I think I have not to state.
Greetings from Goslar
Georg
23rd Feb 2008 22:08 UTCChris Stefano Expert
23rd Feb 2008 23:00 UTCAlbert Mura
25th Feb 2008 18:26 UTCMorion
In response to Georg and Chris,
I will experiment with sulfuric and hydrochloric acids. I have used these in the past, and so apt to use them again. Thank you.
In response to Alberta,
There has been no definitive confirmation that it's fluorite. This has simply been the conclusion when discussing this issue several months ago on this site with a chemist. Do you suspect something other?
25th Feb 2008 20:24 UTCAlbert Mura
26th Feb 2008 00:58 UTCMorion
For your interest,
The clay coatings originally on the specimens when collected were successfully removed using ammonium fluoride. The two locations that formed this white precipitant when treating the specimens originate from what i suspect is an alkaline pegmatite. Visibly you cannot see anything other than quartz, but variably when treated the precipitant forms. Very interestingly the precipitants forms on select faces.
Maybe there are surficial traces of Ca on select faces due to the originating environment causing precipitation of fluorite (or something)?
Thanks again,
Morion
26th Feb 2008 01:25 UTCDon Saathoff Expert
I can't know if this is your problem or not, but something to consider as opposed to a precipitant from the bifluoride.
Don S.
27th Feb 2008 00:28 UTCMorion
To answer your inquiry, it is a precipitant (see attached).
I am surprised you are not having much luck treating your SB specimens with bifluoride. When you say bifluoride do you mean the crystalline ammoniun bifluoride (lets call it CAB for now)? I have intentionally etched specimens (scrap pieces) before to learn my boundaries, but for the most part i have had much success using CAB with little monitoring. What i can say is that when CAB dissolves it appears to become "layered" at different concentrations in the solution with the most concentrated layer at the bottom. Unnoticed (and unstirred) this will begin etching specimens. Of course this condition is dependent upon concentration and temperature and can be avoided if appropriately adjusted.
You may want to reconsider using CAB to minimize your treatment hazards (and the nuisance of monitoring:)).
AZ Rockhound,
Morion
27th Feb 2008 00:31 UTCMorion
Its precipitant on left and etching on right.
28th Feb 2008 01:04 UTCDon Saathoff Expert
BTW, the white coating looks very similar to the coatings on the Sierra Blanca Smokey....
Don S.
28th Feb 2008 16:44 UTCMorion
Yes the coating looks very similar to the coatings on the Sierra Blanca Smokies (when partially treated), but this coating was non-existent before the treatment and becomes thicker with further treatment. I have had the same issue when treating pegmatite amethyst scepters from Santo Nino Mine, Santa Cruz Co., AZ.
Thanks again for your input.
28th Mar 2008 11:27 UTCRock Currier Expert
Why is physical removal of the coating not an option? Can you scratch it of with the point of a knife blade?
Rock
28th Mar 2008 22:50 UTCMorion
My hopeful approach, if it can be chemically added then it can be chemically removed (with exceptions). Just waiting to acquire new acid solutions to test, so i might be back if unsuccessful.
29th Mar 2008 11:46 UTCRock Currier Expert
Rock
29th Mar 2008 14:00 UTCDonald Peck
George is correct that sulfuric acid will remove the fluorite. He is also correct that the generated H2F2 most probably will attack the quartz, probably etching the crystal faces. If you use sulfuric acid, be sure to take safety precautions and work out-of-doors where the generated hydrogen fluoride can escape . . . and stay up-wind of it.
Don
2nd Apr 2008 03:39 UTCHoward Heitner
2nd Apr 2008 12:58 UTCAlfredo Petrov Manager
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: April 26, 2024 17:06:30
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: April 26, 2024 17:06:30