Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Identity HelpMigmatite?

29th Aug 2014 21:54 UTCSteve Federico

02356050016027001067918.jpg
Dear Sir's this is a glacial erratic found in Northwest,Ohio,USA.Thank you Canada.At first I thought it was Gneiss but not now.It look's like pictures of Migmatite in books etc.The rounded bands seem right for it.Please let me know what you think.Thank's for any replies.......Steve

03255610016027001065941.jpg

05680530016027001067646.jpg

30th Aug 2014 00:55 UTCPaul Brandes 🌟 Manager

To me, it doesn't look metamorphosed enough to call it a migmatite. In a migmatite, one would expect to see a very sharp and definite contrast between alternating bands of light coloured (leucosome) and dark coloured (melanosome) rocks; I just don't see it here. I believe it's still a gneiss that was well on its way to becoming a migmatite, but didn't quite make it.

30th Aug 2014 03:41 UTCBill Cordua 🌟 Manager

I agree with Paul, but there is I think somewhat of a gradation between the two. Migmatites are intimate intermixtures of igneous-looking and metamorphic material. (The "looking" refers to an old debate about the origin of granite rocks in these high grade metamorphic rocks) Some would be ok with this as a migmatite.

30th Aug 2014 13:41 UTCHarold Moritz 🌟 Expert

We have plenty of migmatite here in Connecticut and based on outcrops I've seen during a field trip lead by USGS geologist Greg Walsh, yours seems to qualify. But these and other complex metamorphic rock types are best characterized at an outcrop scale due to heterogeneities much bigger than your sample, which of course you don't get in erratics.


Your nice find reminds me of my college days at CWRU in Cleveland, where we would visit stream valleys cutting down to Lake Erie level. Here we'd find all kinds of cool Canadian Shield rocks eroded from till that we would have to characterize in petrology class.
 
and/or  
Mindat Discussions Facebook Logo Instagram Logo Discord Logo
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: May 12, 2024 19:08:15
Go to top of page