Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Identity Helpif someone kindly tell me it's Topaz or something else please...

2nd Dec 2014 17:46 UTCAbdulB Sh

04764960016054477399678.jpg
Hello respectable experts,

i have this terminated piece of stone and i guess its topaz i could certainly be wrong, help me please.

sharp crystal of quartz does not scratch it,

thanks

05130880016054477391572.jpg

06686460016054477392369.jpg

2nd Dec 2014 22:23 UTCsteven garza

Dear sh;


Please repost better pictures; if you look at your shots, they all have the fabric background in PERFECT focus, which is why we can't see the specimen clearly. If you have your camera on automatic focus, the focusing sensor tends to use the largest object as the focus point, ESPECIALLY when dealing with small objects. Also, try not to take the shot, with the light going through the piece; that "blinds" us from seeing the external features, which tend to be more important than the specimen's clarity.


From what I do see, in your 3rd shot, there are 3 directions for the growth lines, showing; this would mean topaz is out. Also, 2 of the growth lines meetings seem to be at the wrong angles, pointing to it being something else. In none of the 3 pictures, do I see any sign of a cleavage, which is another negative sign for topaz. The fact that you did a hardness test, helped; however, there are too many other minerals, in pegmatites/granites, that can have a hardness greater than 7.


Better pictures will help.


Your friend, Steve

3rd Dec 2014 05:07 UTCHarald Schillhammer Expert

It would also be helpful to provide a locality.

3rd Dec 2014 05:53 UTCReinhardt van Vuuren

A simple SG test would also help a lot, since one doesn't have much else to work with here.

3rd Dec 2014 13:06 UTCAbdulB Sh

05195380016054477409086.jpg
thanks to Mr Steven Garza, Mr Harald Schillhammer and Mr Reinhardt van Vuuren for replies......i was 'nt around for some time.

sir. this mineral could be either from Pakistan or Afghanistan, it is inert to both LW & SW Lights,

thanks


06242670016054477407970.jpg

06881120016054477402213.jpg

3rd Dec 2014 20:53 UTCsteven garza

Dear Abdul;


Not sure what it could be, BUT, I can tell you that's not topaz. On the plus side, with a hardness of 7+, it's GOT to be something rare & very unusual. The only one I could come up with was chrysoberyl.


Your friend, Steve

3rd Dec 2014 23:09 UTCOwen Melfyn Lewis

Well, I have a short list of five guesses. But off those photos and scant other information, I'm keeping my mouth shut :-)


I'll bet a six-pack that it not chrysoberyl. Make that a half dozen of Pol Roger :)-D


Sorry Abdul. We Nasrani like our grape juice fermented :-)

3rd Dec 2014 23:32 UTCsteven garza

Dear Owen & Abdul;


I have to agree; that can't be chrysoberyl - striations (even for bizarrely twinned xls) are wrong.


Your friend, Steve

4th Dec 2014 06:40 UTCAbdulB Sh

thank you Mr Owen Melfyn Lewis for reply,i've neer been to Kerala :-) and,

thank you very much Steve, for your help and support, i just wanted to know if it was Topaz, as you said its not,am agreed

thanks again,

Sh,

4th Dec 2014 12:11 UTCMichael Wood

Hello AbdulB Sh,


I think your specimen looks like a piece of aquamarine (beryl), going by colour and hardness. It looks like it has formed within other minerals (eg. Microcline feldspar) so it does not show any proper crystal faces, which would explain it's strange shape.


Mike

4th Dec 2014 15:39 UTCAbdulB Sh

ty Mr Michael Wood for your help....i guess it probebly would be some sort of Beryl,
 
and/or  
Mindat Discussions Facebook Logo Instagram Logo Discord Logo
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: May 3, 2024 22:15:20
Go to top of page