Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Fakes & FraudsHilutite/Hilutit

21st May 2014 19:22 UTCKristi Hugs

Someone asked me about this today and I had never heard of it, so of course, I am coming to the experts. One site says it was found in 2009, another says 2004. It is supposedly a combination of Goethite, Quartz, Zircon and Garnet. All four are common enough, but I suppose the combination has warranted it a "SUPER RARE!!!" title. The fact that it was sent to four testers and none of them could ID its contents but a fifth could? sends up a red flag for me. Of course, I could be way off the mark. I found one site that explained what it is, but again, I am just not sure this is legit. Help? s http://www.hilutit.com/informations.html

21st May 2014 19:46 UTCReiner Mielke Expert

Sounds like quartz with some inclusions of zircon,garnet and goethite, nothing mineralogically unusual about that. However, I guess it depends on how you define "rare". Probably 99.9% of quartz does not have such inclusions and therefore you could call it rare, but then you can make the same argument for hundreds if not thousands of combinations of other minerals as well.

21st May 2014 19:54 UTCDavid Von Bargen Manager

Professional mineralogists tend to frown on people naming things like a mineral that are not minerals. It seems to be a mixture of 4 minerals (things like that are generally called rocks). If you try and do an X-ray of the thing, you wind up with all the peaks of the four minerals combined and those type of things are pretty hard to sort out if you are not expecting it.


A bit overpriced hype like usual.

21st May 2014 20:03 UTCKristi Hugs

Thanks so much!! It is nice to have wiser minds prevail when stuff is as confusing as it can be. I am truly grateful for your help!!
 
and/or  
Mindat Discussions Facebook Logo Instagram Logo Discord Logo
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: May 9, 2024 15:30:53
Go to top of page