Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

LocalitiesUpper Auluta River, Malaita Island, Malaita Province, Solomon Islands

I have read Allen & Deans, and I see no justification for the existence of this locality. A&D do not describe a "Upper Auluta River" locality as a separate locality, but they describe the nr. 1 and nr. 2 localities as shown on the map at page 3 of their publication (https://rruff.info/doclib/MinMag/Volume_34/34-268-16.pdf) located at tributaries of the Upper Auluta River.  I propose to delete this locality.

27th Apr 2024 00:20 UTCKeith Compton 🌟 Manager

I disagree the text states:

"In a small tributary of the Upper Auluta River (locality 1) a trail of ilmenite led to the outcrop of the ankaratrite, which appeared to be fairly extensive".

I suppose you could change the No. 2 locality to read something like: Unnamed locality, Unnamed tributary of Kwaifa River, Upper Auluta River, Malaita Island .. etc.

To delete it altogether would be inaccurate.

The No. 1 locality is in the Hohomela River which is a tributary of the upper Auluta River
Yes, locality 1 on the map is located in a tributary of the Upper Auluta River, but NOT in the Upper Auluta River itself.

Nowhere in the text it is suggested that the Upper Auluta River itself is a locality where samples have been taken, and therefore it should be deleted as a locality.

Or, alternatively, the Upper Auluta River could become the parent locality, with the Alnöite and Ankaratrite localities as child localities.

It would anyway be more correct to register these as separate localities.

But to have 3 localities, of which 2 are true localities where samples have been taken, and 1 with only geograpical relevance, seems a bit redundant.

I would personally prefer to drop the Upper Auluta locality altogether. I do not see that any relevant/important data is contained/preserved in having such a locality registered at Mindat.
 
and/or  
Mindat Discussions Facebook Logo Instagram Logo Discord Logo
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: May 7, 2024 20:23:23
Go to top of page