1/2
?

Opalised Wood

How to use the mindat.org media viewer

Click/touch this help panel to close it.

Welcome to the mindat.org media viewer. Here is a quick guide to some of the options available to you. Different controls are available depending on the type of media being shown (photo, video, animation, 3d image)

Controls - all media types

Zoom in and out of media using your mousewheel or with a two-finger 'resize' action on a touch device.

Use the mouse or your finger to drag the image or the view area of the image around the screen.

< and > at the left and right hand side of the screen move forwards and backwards for the other images associated with the media you selected. Usually this is used for previous/next photo in a gallery, in an article or in search results. Keyboard shortcuts: use shift + the left and right arrow keys.

< and > in the bottom center are used for switching between the photos of the same specimen. Keyboard shortcuts: use the left and right arrow keys.

>  in the bottom center, raises the information box giving details and further options for the media,  <  at the top of this box then hides it. Keyboard shortcuts: use the up and down arrow keys.

? opens this help window. Keyboard shortcuts: use the H key or the ? key.

Other keyboard shortcuts:

1Fit image to screen
2Fill screen with image
5Display at full resolution
<Make background darker
>Make background lighter
spaceHide/dim titles and buttons

Scalebar

If the field of view (FOV) is specified for the photo, the scalebar appears in the left bottom corner of the viewer. The scalebar is draggable and resizeable. Drag the right edge to resize it. Double click will reset the scalebar to it's default size and position. If the scalebar is in default position, double click will make it circular.

Controls - Video

Video files have a standard set of video controls: - Reset to start, - Skip back, - Play, - Pause, - Skip forwards. Keyboard shortcuts: You can stop/start video play with the P key.

Controls - Animation (Spin Rotation)

Animation (usually 360 degree spin rotations) have their own controls: - enable spin mode. Note that while images are loading this option will not be available but will be automatically activated when the animation has loaded. Once active you can spin the image/change the animation by moving your mouse or finger on the image left/right or by pressing the [ or ] keys.

The button switches to move mode so that you can use your mouse/fingers to move the image around the screen as with other media types.

The button, or the P key will start playing the animation directly, you can interrupt this by using the mouse or finger on the image to regain manual movement control.

Controls - 3D Stereoscopic images

If a stereoscopic 3D image is opened in the viewer, the 3D button appears in the bottom right corner giving access to "3D settings" menu. The 3D images can be viewed in several ways:
- without any special equipment using cross-eyed or parallel-eyed method
- with stereoscope
- with anaglyph glasses.
- on a suitable 3D TV or monitor (passive 3D system)

For details about 3D refer to: Mindat manuals: Mindat Media Viewer: 3D

To enable/disable 3D stereo display of a compatible stereo pair image press the 3 key. If the left/right images are reversed on your display (this often happens in full-screen mode) press the 4 key to reverse them.

Controls - photo comparison mode

If a photo with activated comparison mode is opened in the viewer, the button appears in the bottom right corner giving access to "Comparison mode settings" menu.

Several layouts are supported: slider and side by-side comparison with up to 6 photos shown synchronously on the screen. On each of the compared photos a view selector is placed, e.g.:  Longwave UV ▼. It shows the name of currently selected view and allows to select a view for each placeholder.

Summary of all keyboard shortcuts

1Fit image to screen
2Fill screen with image
3Switch to 3D display of stereo pair
4Switch left/right images in 3D mode
5Display at full resolution
<, >Make background darker/lighter
H or ?Show/hide this help page
PPlay/Pause Video or Animation
[, ]Backwards/forwards one frame (Animation only)
spaceHide/dim titles and buttons
up arrowShow information box
down arrowHide information box
left arrowPrevious child photo
right arrowNext child photo
shift + left arrowPrevious image on the page
shift + right arrowNext image on the page


Copyright © J.Kornaga
 
 
 
 
 
minID: DE2-Q07

Opalised Wood

Copyright © J.Kornaga  - This image is copyrighted. Unauthorized reproduction prohibited.
Field of View: 20 mm

Drilling of xylophages in fossil wood

Collected: 2012

This photo has been shown 252 times
Photo added:12th May 2019
Dimensions:2024x1518px (3.07 megapixels)
Camera:CANON IXUS 185

Data Identifiers

Mindat Photo ID:954739 📋 (quote this with any query about this photo)
Long-form Identifier:mindat:1:4:954739:8 📋
GUID:78bcaac3-5e5f-476a-b5b9-c068c005c1d0 📋
Specimen MinIDDE2-Q07 (note: this is not unique to this photo, it is unique to the specimen)

Other Views - click to switch

Discuss this Photo

PhotosPetrified Wood - Blue Forest, Eden Valley, Sweetwater Co., Wyoming, USA

12th May 2019 21:17 UTCŁukasz Kruszewski Expert

This image is completely out of focus...............

12th May 2019 22:15 UTCAlix Julien

Hello Łukasz


Yes it is rather out of focus, but for once (it is very rarely the case ^ ^), I do not feel that it is too serious compared to the subject of the photo. It illustrates pretty well what it is.

We must see if it's the only picture or if there is better.

On the other hand if I had not read the legend of the photo I would not have understood what it was.

I confess that I will never think to say that because I hate the blurry photos. As if people did not see it (That's to wonder !?) .. And only god know as there are often ... Whether on Mindat or Ebay or other sites.

I imagine it is due to lack of knowledge and insufficient material. But personally i will take never waste anyone's time with fuzzy photos, surely because I am already aware of that.


See you soon


Alix JULIEN

12th May 2019 23:09 UTCKuba Kornaga

... my pictures often have to show / present what on mindat (in individual pages) what has not been here yet … not everyone stops over the pictures admires them (and God knows what else is doing over them), many people using the site simply need to compare their findings with others ... and they are still missing here !!!


... there is a gallery where the best pictures land - not all of them, there are regular galleries and these user


... and if you like do not like it, do not watch ......


Łukasz ... if you already do such actions / air raids ... it's best to remove half of the photos from mindat (because they are not sharp) and you put only yours in their place …


Too bad nerves, the service went to the dogs.

13th May 2019 00:03 UTCAlix Julien

I understand Kura and I even agree with you.

I myself use Mindat for comparison (and educational). And without all his photos there will be nothing.

I do not have the highest level in photography but there are some photos that are really unreadable times. This is a reality (I do not say that this is the case for yours, I say as a rule). And best is to do what Łukasz did, that is to say, talk about it on the forum and present our opinions.

After, if the photo was validated by Admin is that there is a reason (even if the errors happen :)


See you soon


Alix JULIEN

13th May 2019 01:04 UTCFrank K. Mazdab 🌟 Manager

Not necessarily specifically here but indeed across the site, if a photo is out of focus or poorly composed, and the possibility exists that an improved version can be re-taken (i.e. if the specimen is still in the photographer's possession; if one's equipment, technique or aesthetic has improved... whatever), it is always suggested, although not necessarily required, that the effort is made to upgrade to a better image.


As I noted on another thread recently, the photos people upload here are more than just inventories of their collections... they are pieces of potential scientific value to the greater collector and professional community. That scientific value is markedly increased if the photo is of the best possible quality the photographer can do with the resources he or she has available. Sharp, well-composed photos need not require thousands of dollars of equipment or a degree in photography; they can and indeed are taken by even by amateurs with just a cellphone camera.

13th May 2019 01:49 UTCAlix Julien

Exact Frank,

I have already combine my camera with a simple magnifying glass to have beautiful macro: D

It helps out well and it allows, with a little patience, to do better now :)

I do not have too much money (which in my head was a big problem) but I found a lot of tricks that allow me to do what I envisioned while I thought it was impossible .


Alix JULIEN

13th May 2019 02:34 UTCMark Heintzelman 🌟 Expert

06658620016028399737111.jpg
The real interest of material from this locality is in how well the original organic structure has been visually preserved. I don't actually see other images that really focus on or exemplify this characteristic, so I also see no problem with including that image in the gallery.


13th May 2019 05:24 UTCKuba Kornaga

But this is not just about the picture, and whether or not the specimen in the picture is rare or rarity.



The person claiming to be Łukasz Kruszewski, is notoriously obstructing me from using the Mindat website. It blocks my account after almost every photo thrown. Earlier, without informing me. In this case, it was just that I was correcting my old-yet unacceptable photos-until at some point my access to Mindat was over. I can't even read my private messages from the Mindat mailbox. He got caught up with me. On pages Mindat gives different information than in reality ... To the already existing threads, he adds his only things, to be him and not from other people ... even then he gives the wrong data ... not being ever in place in any concrete location, think that he is right too ... it is paranoia after all


and it can not be that one person would make me such a CHAOS

13th May 2019 06:19 UTCKuba Kornaga

07804530016028399736178.jpg
... other pictures are of course also, but I want to show what is most important in the specimen …


13th May 2019 10:28 UTCŁukasz Kruszewski Expert

Ok, great. I agree with you.

13th May 2019 18:15 UTCUwe Kolitsch Manager

Kuba: Łukasz is not a manager and he cannot block your account.

13th May 2019 22:16 UTCŁukasz Kruszewski Expert

Thanks, Uwe. I tried to explain it...

15th May 2019 18:25 UTCGregg Little 🌟

I am not sure why a poor photo attracts so much argument when as stated the photo has to be good (in focus, colour balanced, well lit, adequately described, etc., etc.) to show the important characteristics. Mr. Kornaga's photos clearly are not good (poor focus and reflective glare). Black and white also is a negative as that is even harder to pull-off, but not objectionable if done well. After all colour is one and often the first of the identification characteristics.


As stated above good photos can be made with inexpensive equipment but one has to practice with the subject and the equipment. One of the other critical and less appreciated factors is lighting. I am no professional by any means but, a poor photo is obvious to virtually everyone and useless to a researcher, scientific publication and lay person looking for identification help. This can obviously be seen comparing Mark's image to Kuba's pictures; which one would you put in your publication?


Poor photos cannot be taken as a personal insult. This is a serious mineral site and you have to rise to the occasion. I'll finish my rant with a quote, "Doing the average keeps the average down.".

16th May 2019 05:10 UTCDoug Daniels

Me thinks we need to calm down on this thread.... There was a photo posted, taken by a member (but posted here by another?), that was not a super-quality photo. Some comments after. And other comments by/about another poster. And.... Going back to the first post - brought in by a member of a photo (yes, not great) taken by another member. Did this really have to happen? This is almost like what some of us used to do with posts by the metaphysical folk. The man took a photo (again, not great), and posted it to his site. Why bring it to the messageboard to denigrate it? Heck, I haven't posted any photos, mainly 'cause my digital camera died years ago, and can't afford a new one (even a cheapie), and I don't even have a smart phone to take photos.


Got my flak jacket on.....
 
Mineral and/or Locality  
Mindat Discussions Facebook Logo Instagram Logo Discord Logo
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: April 26, 2024 12:26:32