Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Improving Mindat.orgFaroe Islands

7th Nov 2006 03:45 UTCKarl Volkman Expert

I spent the day (hopefully) cleaning up organizing and fleshing out he Faro Islands. There are still several locations that don't have a specific island that they are attributed to and the entries are old enough that they do not have any changes history preserved. If someone with more specific knowledge could look over the Faroes and make additional corrections and updates that would be great



Thanks

Karl

7th Nov 2006 13:08 UTCPeter Andresen Expert

Should we have Færøene in the locality strings as well, the original name of the islands... (just having an other discussion in this forum in mind: http://www.mindat.org/mesg-7-49281.html )


An other funny thing about language... Almost all the islands have the nordic word for island in their name (øy = island), f.ex. Streymøy island then would be "translated" to Streym island island as it's listed in Mindat... I just can't help smiling each time I see it ;)


Cheers

Peter


PS: great job Karl! I have unfortunatly not so much to add, as my knowledge about collecting on Færøene is limited.

7th Nov 2006 19:36 UTCKarl Volkman Expert

I was wondering about that a little as I was working through then with Wikipedia. My initial thoughts on that would be to have the English "Translation" of the names in the primary locality string and have either the Danish or Norse names in the original language string. This would catch most of the searches and the more common synonyms could be added as alternates into one or the other of the strings.


Regards

Karl


P.S. Thanks, i got a Chabazite/heulandite over the weekend from Malinsfjall and things went from there. :)

9th Nov 2006 17:33 UTCVolker Betz 🌟 Expert

Hello Karl,


thank you for the work with Faroe locations. I have spent may weeks on Faroes for colleting, mostly in the 1974 to 1983 time frame. Also a little recently 2002 and 2003.


I will update the loaction information in some time with picture postings and use the actual writing from the maps.


Greetings


Volker

10th Nov 2006 08:39 UTCHans Kloster

Thanks to Volker Betz for:

Famous mineral localities: zeolites from Iceland and the Faeroes. The Mineralogical Record. January-February 1981.


And good books:

Kristjan Sæmundsson and Einar Gunnlaugssson: Islenska steinabokin. Reykjavik 1999.


Fritz Schalkhausse: Fundstellen von Mineralien und Fossilien in Island. 2.Auflage. München 1984.

14th Nov 2006 16:32 UTCVolker Betz 🌟 Expert

Hello,


I started to add location names to the faroes locations. And I saw Peter Andresen also did (thank you !)


We should discuss which kind of names will be used: the Faroes or Danish ones. Maps over the last decades are different:


Older maps show e.g. Kollafjörður the newer (with faroes names) Kollafjørður.


Also the addition of Danmark after Føroyer is not typical for for the faroes writing. Like Scotland they claim to be a own Nation (and have own (inter-)national soccer team, like Scotland) and in fact


the 1:200000 scale map from 1971 is named: Kort af Danmark with subtitle Føroyer

and the 1978 issue is named: Føroyakort, Danmark is not anymore mentioned.


So my recommendation woud be:


In the english writing (and dansk) the addition Danmark is ok, because we look from outside. If the faroes witing is used then not, because they feel different.


Also to my opinion in earth sciences we should use more geographic units and less political. FØROYER is a very clear geographical unit (of Europe).


Greetings from Europe



Volker

14th Nov 2006 23:23 UTCAlfredo Petrov Manager

I agree with Volker. We already use Greenland without adding Denmark, so we may as well do the same with the Faroes. Let the dismemberment of the danish empire begin! (Nothing against the Danes, whom I greatly admire - I'd do the same with lots of countries.)
 
Mineral and/or Locality  
Mindat Discussions Facebook Logo Instagram Logo Discord Logo
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2024, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: April 26, 2024 03:04:02
Go to top of page