BETA TEST - Fossil data and pages are very much experimental and under development. Please report any problems
Little Bay - DDH2: 1.0 m, New South Wales, Australia
| Lat/Long (Decimal) | -33.9667,151.233 |
|---|---|
| Co-ordinates Derivation | estimated from map |
| Given Location | New south wales, Australia |
| Mindat.org Region (for given coordinates) | New South Wales, Australia |
Collections
| Collection | Reference | Stratigraphic Name | Comments | Lithology | Age |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Little Bay - DDH2: 1.0 m | Pickett J. W., Macphail M. K., et al (1997) | Evidence for the age of the deposit comes from the palynological assemblages. The data are emphatic that the deposit falls within one palynological zone. The maximum and minimum age limits are Early Oligocene and Middle Miocene, based on Acaciapollenites myriosporites, Nothofagidites flemingii, N. goniatus, Tubulifloridites simplis and the absence of taxa which first appear in the Late Miocene, such as Amperea and Monotoca. However, the probable maximum age is Middle Miocene based on the ocurren | claystone | 15.97 - 11.608 Ma Miocene | |
| Little Bay - DDH2: 1.13 m | Pickett J. W., Macphail M. K., et al (1997) | Evidence for the age of the deposit comes from the palynological assemblages. The data are emphatic that the deposit falls within one palynological zone. The maximum and minimum age limits are Early Oligocene and Middle Miocene, based on Acaciapollenites myriosporites, Nothofagidites flemingii, N. goniatus, Tubulifloridites simplis and the absence of taxa which first appear in the Late Miocene, such as Amperea and Monotoca. However, the probable maximum age is Middle Miocene based on the ocurren | claystone | 15.97 - 11.608 Ma Miocene | |
| Little Bay - DDH2: 1.97 m | Pickett J. W., Macphail M. K., et al (1997) | Evidence for the age of the deposit comes from the palynological assemblages. The data are emphatic that the deposit falls within one palynological zone. The maximum and minimum age limits are Early Oligocene and Middle Miocene, based on Acaciapollenites myriosporites, Nothofagidites flemingii, N. goniatus, Tubulifloridites simplis and the absence of taxa which first appear in the Late Miocene, such as Amperea and Monotoca. However, the probable maximum age is Middle Miocene based on the ocurren | claystone | 15.97 - 11.608 Ma Miocene | |
| Little Bay - DDH2:13.8 m | Pickett J. W., Macphail M. K., et al (1997) | Evidence for the age of the deposit comes from the palynological assemblages. The data are emphatic that the deposit falls within one palynological zone. The maximum and minimum age limits are Early Oligocene and Middle Miocene, based on Acaciapollenites myriosporites, Nothofagidites flemingii, N. goniatus, Tubulifloridites simplis and the absence of taxa which first appear in the Late Miocene, such as Amperea and Monotoca. However, the probable maximum age is Middle Miocene based on the ocurren | sandstone | 15.97 - 11.608 Ma Miocene | |
| Little Bay - DDH2:8.25 m | Pickett J. W., Macphail M. K., et al (1997) | Evidence for the age of the deposit comes from the palynological assemblages. The data are emphatic that the deposit falls within one palynological zone. The maximum and minimum age limits are Early Oligocene and Middle Miocene, based on Acaciapollenites myriosporites, Nothofagidites flemingii, N. goniatus, Tubulifloridites simplis and the absence of taxa which first appear in the Late Miocene, such as Amperea and Monotoca. However, the probable maximum age is Middle Miocene based on the ocurren | claystone | 15.97 - 11.608 Ma Miocene |
Recorded Fossils
References
Data courtesy of: PBDB: The Paleobiology Database, Creative Commons CC-BY licenced. , GBIF: the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, various licences, iDigBio, various licences, and EOL: The Encyclopedia of Life (Open Data Public Domain). Because fossils are made of minerals too!
